These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3077082)
1. Invited contribution: an objective approach to the development of short-term tests predictive of carcinogenicity. Rosenkranz HS; Ennever FK; Chankong V; Pet-Edwards J; Haimes YY Cell Biol Toxicol; 1986 Dec; 2(4):425-40. PubMed ID: 3077082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of the carcinogenicity prediction and battery selection method to recent National Toxicology Program short-term test data. Ennever FK; Rosenkranz HS Environ Mol Mutagen; 1989; 13(4):332-8. PubMed ID: 2737184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles. Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Toxicogenomics applied to in vitro carcinogenicity testing with Balb/c 3T3 cells revealed a gene signature predictive of chemical carcinogens. Rohrbeck A; Salinas G; Maaser K; Linge J; Salovaara S; Corvi R; Borlak J Toxicol Sci; 2010 Nov; 118(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 20713471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting carcinogenicity by using batteries of dependent short-term tests. Kim BS; Margolin BH Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Jan; 102 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):127-30. PubMed ID: 8187701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short-term tests for defining mutagenic carcinogens. Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):499-536. PubMed ID: 10353401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CARCINOscreen®: New short-term prediction method for hepatocarcinogenicity of chemicals based on hepatic transcript profiling in rats. Matsumoto H; Saito F; Takeyoshi M J Toxicol Sci; 2014; 39(5):725-34. PubMed ID: 25242402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomedical Research Meets Toxicology: How Stolz A; Becker M; Wistorf E; Ertych N Cancer Res; 2020 Apr; 80(8):1626-1629. PubMed ID: 32094300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The carcinogenicity of diethylstilbestrol: structural evidence for a non-genotoxic mechanism. Cunningham A; Klopman G; Rosenkranz HS Arch Toxicol; 1996; 70(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 8975634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity utilizing a battery of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity tests. Kim BS; Margolin BH Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 34(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 10618179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Alternatives to the carcinogenicity bioassay for toxicity prediction: are we there yet? Benigni R Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2012 Apr; 8(4):407-17. PubMed ID: 22360376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the TOPKAT system for predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals. Prival MJ Environ Mol Mutagen; 2001; 37(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 11170242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Epidemiological and experimental applications to occupational cancer prevention. Vainio H; Hemminki K J UOEH; 1989 Mar; 11 Suppl():323-45. PubMed ID: 2664947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Knowledge-based battery design of short-term tests based on dose information. Buzzi R; Würgler FE Mutat Res; 1990 Oct; 234(5):269-88. PubMed ID: 2215543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Bhas 42 cell transformation assay on 98 chemicals: the characteristics and performance for the prediction of chemical carcinogenicity. Sakai A; Sasaki K; Muramatsu D; Arai S; Endou N; Kuroda S; Hayashi K; Lim YM; Yamazaki S; Umeda M; Tanaka N Mutat Res; 2010 Sep; 702(1):100-22. PubMed ID: 20656056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens? Gaylor DW Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mouse-specific carcinogens: an assessment of hazard and significance for validation of short-term carcinogenicity bioassays in transgenic mice. Battershill JM; Fielder RJ Hum Exp Toxicol; 1998 Apr; 17(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 9617631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Alternative Carcinogenicity Screening Assay Using Colon Cancer Stem Cells: A Quantitative PCR (qPCR)-Based Prediction System for Colon Carcinogenesis. Bak Y; Jang HJ; Shin JW; Kim SJ; Chun HW; Seo JH; No SH; Chae JI; Son DH; Lee SY; Hong J; Yoon DY J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Apr; 28(4):645-651. PubMed ID: 29539880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The carcinogenicity prediction and battery selection (CPBS) method: a Bayesian approach. Chankong V; Haimes YY; Rosenkranz HS; Pet-Edwards J Mutat Res; 1985 May; 153(3):135-66. PubMed ID: 3990699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer assisted short-term test battery design: some answers (reply to John Ashby's commentary in Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis). Ennever FK; Rosenkranz HS Environ Mol Mutagen; 1988; 12(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 3191915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]