395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30770958)
1. Bimodal-divided attention attenuates visually induced inhibition of return with audiovisual targets.
Tang X; Gao Y; Yang W; Ren Y; Wu J; Zhang M; Wu Q
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):1093-1107. PubMed ID: 30770958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visually Induced Inhibition of Return Affects the Integration of Auditory and Visual Information.
Van der Stoep N; Van der Stigchel S; Nijboer TCW; Spence C
Perception; 2017 Jan; 46(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 27484341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multisensory integration attenuates visually induced oculomotor inhibition of return.
Tang X; Yuan M; Shi Z; Gao M; Ren R; Wei M; Gao Y
J Vis; 2022 Mar; 22(4):7. PubMed ID: 35297999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return.
Tang X; Wang X; Peng X; Li Q; Zhang C; Wang A; Zhang M
Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8056. PubMed ID: 33850180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-spatial inhibition of return attenuates audiovisual integration owing to modality disparities.
Wang X; Tang X; Wang A; Zhang M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38127253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.
Blurton SP; Greenlee MW; Gondan M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2356-76. PubMed ID: 26001381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the relative contributions of multisensory integration and crossmodal exogenous spatial attention to multisensory response enhancement.
Van der Stoep N; Spence C; Nijboer TC; Van der Stigchel S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():20-8. PubMed ID: 26436587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues.
Barrett DJ; Krumbholz K
Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):11-20. PubMed ID: 22975896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exogenous spatial attention decreases audiovisual integration.
Van der Stoep N; Van der Stigchel S; Nijboer TC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):464-82. PubMed ID: 25341648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vertical asymmetries and inhibition of return: effects of spatial and non-spatial cueing on behavior and visual ERPs.
Gutiérrez-Domínguez FJ; Pazo-Álvarez P; Doallo S; Fuentes LJ; Lorenzo-López L; Amenedo E
Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Feb; 91(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 24342058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Disentangling perceptual and motor components in inhibition of return.
Zhou B
Cogn Process; 2008 Aug; 9(3):175-87. PubMed ID: 18327623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatial Inhibition of Return promotes changes in response-related mu and beta oscillatory patterns.
Amenedo E; Gutiérrez-Domínguez FJ; Darriba Á; Pazo-Álvarez P
Neuroscience; 2015 Dec; 310():616-28. PubMed ID: 26456119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
Koppen C; Spence C
Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17408855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using the locus-of-slack logic to determine whether inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm is delaying early or late stages of processing.
Kavyani M; Farsi A; Abdoli B; Klein RM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 71(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 27936837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inhibitory interaction: the effects of multiple non-predictive visual cues.
Visser TA; Barnes D
Psychol Res; 2010 Nov; 74(6):532-44. PubMed ID: 20182742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.
Schmitt M; Postma A; De Haan E
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.
Koppen C; Spence C
Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(4):737-54. PubMed ID: 17333012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Focal spatial attention can eliminate inhibition of return.
Wang Z; Klein RM
Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):462-9. PubMed ID: 22351588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inhibition of return is supramodal: a demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition.
Spence C; Lloyd D; McGlone F; Nicholls ME; Driver J
Exp Brain Res; 2000 Sep; 134(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 11026724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automatic selective attention as a function of sensory modality in aging.
Guerreiro MJ; Adam JJ; Van Gerven PW
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 Mar; 67(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 21798856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
