These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30770958)

  • 1. Bimodal-divided attention attenuates visually induced inhibition of return with audiovisual targets.
    Tang X; Gao Y; Yang W; Ren Y; Wu J; Zhang M; Wu Q
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):1093-1107. PubMed ID: 30770958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visually Induced Inhibition of Return Affects the Integration of Auditory and Visual Information.
    Van der Stoep N; Van der Stigchel S; Nijboer TCW; Spence C
    Perception; 2017 Jan; 46(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 27484341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Non-spatial inhibition of return attenuates audiovisual integration owing to modality disparities.
    Wang X; Tang X; Wang A; Zhang M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Oct; 86(7):2315-2328. PubMed ID: 38127253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multisensory integration attenuates visually induced oculomotor inhibition of return.
    Tang X; Yuan M; Shi Z; Gao M; Ren R; Wei M; Gao Y
    J Vis; 2022 Mar; 22(4):7. PubMed ID: 35297999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return.
    Tang X; Wang X; Peng X; Li Q; Zhang C; Wang A; Zhang M
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8056. PubMed ID: 33850180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audiovisual Integration Decreases Inhibition of Return in Children With ADHD.
    Zhang H; Chen Y; Sun J; Cai S; Tang X; Wang A
    J Atten Disord; 2024 Nov; 28(13):1684-1696. PubMed ID: 39340119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.
    Blurton SP; Greenlee MW; Gondan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2356-76. PubMed ID: 26001381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the relative contributions of multisensory integration and crossmodal exogenous spatial attention to multisensory response enhancement.
    Van der Stoep N; Spence C; Nijboer TC; Van der Stigchel S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():20-8. PubMed ID: 26436587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues.
    Barrett DJ; Krumbholz K
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):11-20. PubMed ID: 22975896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exogenous spatial attention decreases audiovisual integration.
    Van der Stoep N; Van der Stigchel S; Nijboer TC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):464-82. PubMed ID: 25341648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vertical asymmetries and inhibition of return: effects of spatial and non-spatial cueing on behavior and visual ERPs.
    Gutiérrez-Domínguez FJ; Pazo-Álvarez P; Doallo S; Fuentes LJ; Lorenzo-López L; Amenedo E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Feb; 91(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 24342058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disentangling perceptual and motor components in inhibition of return.
    Zhou B
    Cogn Process; 2008 Aug; 9(3):175-87. PubMed ID: 18327623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial Inhibition of Return promotes changes in response-related mu and beta oscillatory patterns.
    Amenedo E; Gutiérrez-Domínguez FJ; Darriba Á; Pazo-Álvarez P
    Neuroscience; 2015 Dec; 310():616-28. PubMed ID: 26456119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17408855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using the locus-of-slack logic to determine whether inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm is delaying early or late stages of processing.
    Kavyani M; Farsi A; Abdoli B; Klein RM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 71(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 27936837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inhibitory interaction: the effects of multiple non-predictive visual cues.
    Visser TA; Barnes D
    Psychol Res; 2010 Nov; 74(6):532-44. PubMed ID: 20182742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.
    Schmitt M; Postma A; De Haan E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(4):737-54. PubMed ID: 17333012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Focal spatial attention can eliminate inhibition of return.
    Wang Z; Klein RM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):462-9. PubMed ID: 22351588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inhibition of return is supramodal: a demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition.
    Spence C; Lloyd D; McGlone F; Nicholls ME; Driver J
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Sep; 134(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 11026724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.