210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30771489)
1. The Trend, Feasibility, and Safety of Salpingectomy as a form of Permanent Sterilization.
Kim AJ; Barberio A; Berens P; Chen HY; Gants S; Swilinski L; Acholonu U; Chang-Jackson SC
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(7):1363-1368. PubMed ID: 30771489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postpartum Permanent Sterilization: Could Bilateral Salpingectomy Replace Bilateral Tubal Ligation?
Danis RB; Della Badia CR; Richard SD
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):928-32. PubMed ID: 27234430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.
Venkatesh KK; Clark LH; Stamilio DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):106.e1-106.e10. PubMed ID: 30170036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extending the safety evidence for opportunistic salpingectomy in prevention of ovarian cancer: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.
Hanley GE; Kwon JS; Finlayson SJ; Huntsman DG; Miller D; McAlpine JN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):172.e1-172.e8. PubMed ID: 29852159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The performance and safety of bilateral salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in the United States.
Hanley GE; McAlpine JN; Pearce CL; Miller D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 216(3):270.e1-270.e9. PubMed ID: 27810554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Role of Opportunistic Bilateral Salpingectomy vs Tubal Occlusion or Ligation for Ovarian Cancer Prophylaxis.
Ely LK; Truong M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):371-378. PubMed ID: 28087480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of Complete Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Postpartum Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Subramaniam A; Blanchard CT; Erickson BK; Szychowski J; Leath CA; Biggio JR; Huh WK
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 132(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 29889762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization.
Antoun L; Smith P; Gupta JK; Clark TJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):570.e1-570.e6. PubMed ID: 28757140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Permanent Sterilization after Failed Attempt at Bilateral Tubal Ligation at the Time of Previous Cesarean Section.
Hui M; Schwartzenburg C; Bhalwal A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 29(10):1138-1139. PubMed ID: 35863610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Salpingectomy for Sterilization: Change in Practice in a Large Integrated Health Care System, 2011-2016.
Powell CB; Alabaster A; Simmons S; Garcia C; Martin M; McBride-Allen S; Littell RD
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):961-967. PubMed ID: 29016486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Examining indicators of early menopause following opportunistic salpingectomy: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.
Hanley GE; Kwon JS; McAlpine JN; Huntsman DG; Finlayson SJ; Miller D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):221.e1-221.e11. PubMed ID: 32067967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk-Reducing Salpingectomy Versus Standard Tubal Sterilization: Lessons From Offering Women Options for Interval Sterilization.
Zerden ML; Castellano T; Doll KM; Stuart GS; Munoz MC; Boggess KA
South Med J; 2018 Mar; 111(3):173-177. PubMed ID: 29505655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Vaginal tubal sterilization: About a series of 158 patients from 2005 to 2021].
Picard M; Duforestel T
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2022 Jun; 50(6):470-474. PubMed ID: 35121173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Opportunistic salpingectomy during postpartum contraception procedures at elective and unscheduled cesarean delivery.
Ferrari F; Forte S; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Odicino F
Contraception; 2019 Jun; 99(6):373-376. PubMed ID: 30898658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention.
Dilley SE; Havrilesky LJ; Bakkum-Gamez J; Cohn DE; Michael Straughn J; Caughey AB; Rodriguez MI
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Aug; 146(2):373-379. PubMed ID: 28577884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception: A Cross Sectional Study in Portugal].
São Pedro V; Pires R; Santos F; Tovim Rodrigues C; Santos Silva I; Almeida MC; Águas F
Acta Med Port; 2021 Mar; 34(4):258-265. PubMed ID: 34214417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interval Female Sterilization.
Stuart GS; Ramesh SS
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 29215509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety outcomes of female sterilization by salpingectomy and tubal occlusion.
Westberg J; Scott F; Creinin MD
Contraception; 2017 May; 95(5):505-508. PubMed ID: 28232128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A retrospective cohort study of tubal occlusion or salpingectomy for permanent contraception in Australia.
Baltus T; Brown J; Kapurubandara S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 62(2):312-318. PubMed ID: 34705269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total bilateral salpingectomy versus partial bilateral salpingectomy for permanent sterilization during cesarean delivery.
Shinar S; Blecher Y; Alpern S; Many A; Ashwal E; Amikam U; Cohen A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 May; 295(5):1185-1189. PubMed ID: 28285425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
