248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30772930)
21. Hybrid WT-CNN-GRU-based model for the estimation of reservoir water quality variables considering spatio-temporal features.
Zamani MG; Nikoo MR; Al-Rawas G; Nazari R; Rastad D; Gandomi AH
J Environ Manage; 2024 May; 358():120756. PubMed ID: 38599080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. New methods based on back propagation (BP) and radial basis function (RBF) artificial neural networks (ANNs) for predicting the occurrence of haloketones in tap water.
Deng Y; Zhou X; Shen J; Xiao G; Hong H; Lin H; Wu F; Liao BQ
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 772():145534. PubMed ID: 33571763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Modeling and optimizing the removal of cadmium by
Jaskulak M; Grobelak A; Vandenbulcke F
Int J Phytoremediation; 2020; 22(12):1321-1330. PubMed ID: 32466658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A decision support tool for selecting the optimal sewage sludge treatment.
Turunen V; Sorvari J; Mikola A
Chemosphere; 2018 Feb; 193():521-529. PubMed ID: 29169127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Utilization of random vector functional link integrated with manta ray foraging optimization for effluent prediction of wastewater treatment plant.
Elmaadawy K; Elaziz MA; Elsheikh AH; Moawad A; Liu B; Lu S
J Environ Manage; 2021 Nov; 298():113520. PubMed ID: 34391109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prediction of sludge bulking using the knowledge-leverage-based fuzzy neural network.
Han H; Liu Z; Ge L; Qiao J
Water Sci Technol; 2018 Feb; 77(3-4):617-627. PubMed ID: 29431706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Feedforward neural network model estimating pollutant removal process within mesophilic upflow anaerobic sludge blanket bioreactor treating industrial starch processing wastewater.
Antwi P; Li J; Meng J; Deng K; Koblah Quashie F; Li J; Opoku Boadi P
Bioresour Technol; 2018 Jun; 257():102-112. PubMed ID: 29486407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance assessment of artificial neural networks and support vector regression models for stream flow predictions.
Ateeq-Ur-Rauf ; Ghumman AR; Ahmad S; Hashmi HN
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Nov; 190(12):704. PubMed ID: 30406854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Implementation of artificial neural network model for continuous hydrogen production using confectionery wastewater.
Yogeswari MK; Dharmalingam K; Mullai P
J Environ Manage; 2019 Dec; 252():109684. PubMed ID: 31622794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Performance evaluation of artificial intelligence paradigms-artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for flood prediction.
Tabbussum R; Dar AQ
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 May; 28(20):25265-25282. PubMed ID: 33453033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparisons of grey and neural network prediction of industrial park wastewater effluent using influent quality and online monitoring parameters.
Pai TY; Chuang SH; Wan TJ; Lo HM; Tsai YP; Su HC; Yu LF; Hu HC; Sung PJ
Environ Monit Assess; 2008 Nov; 146(1-3):51-66. PubMed ID: 18196467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Artificial intelligence based model for optimization of COD removal efficiency of an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor in the saline wastewater treatment.
Picos-Benítez AR; López-Hincapié JD; Chávez-Ramírez AU; Rodríguez-García A
Water Sci Technol; 2017 Mar; 75(5-6):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 28333051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Modeling of an activated sludge process for effluent prediction-a comparative study using ANFIS and GLM regression.
Araromi DO; Majekodunmi OT; Adeniran JA; Salawudeen TO
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Aug; 190(9):495. PubMed ID: 30069797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predicting river dissolved oxygen time series based on stand-alone models and hybrid wavelet-based models.
Xu C; Chen X; Zhang L
J Environ Manage; 2021 Oct; 295():113085. PubMed ID: 34147993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Machine learning-based prediction of effluent total suspended solids in a wastewater treatment plant using different feature selection approaches: A comparative study.
Gholizadeh M; Saeedi R; Bagheri A; Paeezi M
Environ Res; 2024 Apr; 246():118146. PubMed ID: 38215928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Application of artificial intelligence models for prediction of groundwater level fluctuations: case study (Tehran-Karaj alluvial aquifer).
Vadiati M; Rajabi Yami Z; Eskandari E; Nakhaei M; Kisi O
Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Jul; 194(9):619. PubMed ID: 35904687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A back propagation neural network model for accurately predicting the removal efficiency of ammonia nitrogen in wastewater treatment plants using different biological processes.
Zhang SZ; Chen S; Jiang H
Water Res; 2022 Aug; 222():118908. PubMed ID: 35917670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predictive modeling of the primary settling tanks based on artificial neural networks for estimating TSS and COD as typical effluent parameters.
Veloz C; Pazmiño-Arias E; Gallardo AM; Montenegro J; Sommer-Márquez A; Ricaurte M
Water Sci Technol; 2022 Jun; 85(12):3451-3464. PubMed ID: 35771057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessing pollution and risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sewage sludge from wastewater treatment plants in China's top coal-producing region.
Wu Q; Liu Z; Liang J; Kuo DTF; Chen S; Hu X; Deng M; Zhang H; Lu Y
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jan; 191(2):102. PubMed ID: 30685817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Thiosteranes in samples impacted by fecal materials and their potential use as marker of sewage input.
Biache C; Frómeta AE; Czechowski F; Lu Y; Philp RP
Environ Pollut; 2015 Jan; 196():268-75. PubMed ID: 25463722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
