126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30773853)
1. Corneal Biomechanics Using a Scheimpflug-Based Noncontact Device in Normal-Tension Glaucoma and Healthy Controls.
Hong K; Wong IYH; Singh K; Chang RT
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila); 2019; 8(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 30773853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Corneal biomechanical responses detected using corvis st in primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma.
Jung Y; Park HL; Oh S; Park CK
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Feb; 99(7):e19126. PubMed ID: 32049829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Novel Parameter of Corneal Biomechanics That Differentiate Normals From Glaucoma.
Lee R; Chang RT; Wong IY; Lai JS; Lee JW; Singh K
J Glaucoma; 2016 Jun; 25(6):e603-9. PubMed ID: 26035421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corneal Biomechanical Parameters and Asymmetric Visual Field Damage in Patients with Untreated Normal Tension Glaucoma.
Li BB; Cai Y; Pan YZ; Li M; Qiao RH; Fang Y; Tian T
Chin Med J (Engl); 2017 Feb; 130(3):334-339. PubMed ID: 28139518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corneal biomechanical characteristics measured by the CorVis Scheimpflug technology in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and normal eyes.
Tian L; Wang D; Wu Y; Meng X; Chen B; Ge M; Huang Y
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 25639340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The association between corneal biomechanical parameters and visual field progression in patients with normal tension glaucoma].
Li BB; Cai Y; Pan YZ; Li M; Fang Y; Tian T; Yan XM
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 54(3):171-176. PubMed ID: 29518874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of corneal biomechanical properties on rebound tonometer in patients with normal-tension glaucoma.
Shin J; Lee JW; Kim EA; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 159(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 25308786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Corneal biomechanics and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension and controls.
Vinciguerra R; Rehman S; Vallabh NA; Batterbury M; Czanner G; Choudhary A; Cheeseman R; Elsheikh A; Willoughby CE
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 104(1):121-126. PubMed ID: 30923134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma and comparison with open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes.
Grise-Dulac A; Saad A; Abitbol O; Febbraro JL; Azan E; Moulin-Tyrode C; Gatinel D
J Glaucoma; 2012 Sep; 21(7):486-9. PubMed ID: 21734593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties in glaucoma and control patients by dynamic Scheimpflug corneal imaging technology].
Coste V; Schweitzer C; Paya C; Touboul D; Korobelnik JF
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2015 Jun; 38(6):504-13. PubMed ID: 25976131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new biomechanical glaucoma factor to discriminate normal eyes from normal pressure glaucoma eyes.
Pillunat KR; Herber R; Spoerl E; Erb C; Pillunat LE
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 97(7):e962-e967. PubMed ID: 31016882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association Between Ocular Biomechanics Measured With Corvis ST and Glaucoma Severity in Patients With Untreated Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.
Wu N; Chen Y; Sun X
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 Jun; 11(6):10. PubMed ID: 35679036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and Scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes.
Huseynova T; Waring GO; Roberts C; Krueger RR; Tomita M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 157(4):885-93. PubMed ID: 24388837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical changes in the cornea following cataract surgery: A prospective assessment with the Corneal Visualisation Scheimpflug Technology.
Wallace HB; Misra SL; Li SS; McKelvie J
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 47(4):461-468. PubMed ID: 30474314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Influence factors and differences of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam system combined with Corvis ST].
Peng YS; Chen M; Tian L; Li H; Li DW; Zhang FF
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 56(2):110-117. PubMed ID: 32074821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in myopes and emmetropes using the Corvis ST.
Lee R; Chang RT; Wong IY; Lai JS; Lee JW; Singh K
Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Mar; 99(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 26893029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ocular biomechanical metrics by CorVis ST in healthy Brazilian patients.
Valbon BF; Ambrósio R; Fontes BM; Luz A; Roberts CJ; Alves MR
J Refract Surg; 2014 Jul; 30(7):468-73. PubMed ID: 24877553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraocular pressure measurements in diabetes mellitus.
Ramm L; Herber R; Spoerl E; Pillunat LE; Terai N
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 30(6):1432-1439. PubMed ID: 31779470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Relationship Between Corvis ST Tonometry Parameters and Ocular Response Analyzer Corneal Hysteresis.
Fujishiro T; Matsuura M; Fujino Y; Murata H; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
J Glaucoma; 2020 Jun; 29(6):479-484. PubMed ID: 32134829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Corneal Biomechanical Properties in High Myopia Measured by Dynamic Scheimpflug Imaging Technology.
He M; Wang W; Ding H; Zhong X
Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Dec; 94(12):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 29135719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
