These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3077414)

  • 1. Finite element analysis of partially edentulous mandible rehabilitated with an osteointegrated cylindrical implant.
    Meroueh KA; Watanabe F; Mentag PJ
    J Oral Implantol; 1987; 13(2):215-38. PubMed ID: 3077414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of straight and staggered implant placement configurations.
    Itoh H; Caputo AA; Kuroe T; Nakahara H
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Feb; 24(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 14984145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Analysis of bone-implant stress distribution. Finite element modeling].
    Valentin I; Taieb A; Benhaim L; Franquin JC; Houri A
    Cah Prothese; 1990 Dec; (72):142-53. PubMed ID: 2268785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A three-dimensional finite element study on two versus four implants in an edentulous mandible.
    Meijer HJ; Starmans FJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 7916894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The custom made one-piece ramus bar implant for the partially edentulous mandible.
    Vassos DM
    J Oral Implantol; 1978; 7(4):544-56. PubMed ID: 296300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the influence of location of osseointegrated implants associated with mandibular removable partial dentures.
    Cunha LD; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Pereira JA
    Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):278-87. PubMed ID: 18784528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The remus implant.
    Kay HM
    J Oral Implantol; 1979; 8(4):586-90. PubMed ID: 297802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A finite element analysis of tilted versus nontilted implant configurations in the edentulous maxilla.
    Bellini CM; Romeo D; Galbusera F; Agliardi E; Pietrabissa R; Zampelis A; Francetti L
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 19418861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining osseointegrated implants and natural teeth to rehabilitate partially edentulous patients.
    Garg AK; Chacon G
    Implant Soc; 1994; 5(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 9571844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-dimensional finite element analysis of the influence of bridge design on stress distribution in bone tissues surrounding fixtures of osseointegrated implants in the lower molar region.
    Arataki T; Adachi Y; Kishi M
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1998 Aug; 39(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 9927906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Syncrystallization: a technique for temporization of immediately loaded implants with metal-reinforced acrylic resin restorations.
    Degidi M; Gehrke P; Spanel A; Piattelli A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):123-34. PubMed ID: 16919020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Immediate occlusal loading of implants in the partially edentate mandible: a prospective 1-year radiographic and 4-year clinical study.
    Ostman PO; Hellman M; Sennerby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):315-22. PubMed ID: 18548929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angled implants with finite-element analysis.
    Canay S; Hersek N; Akpinar I; Aşik Z
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Sep; 27(9):591-8. PubMed ID: 9180415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of anisotropy on peri-implant stress and strain in complete mandible model from CT.
    Liao SH; Tong RF; Dong JX
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jan; 32(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17951028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prosthodontic prescriptions for mandibular implant overdentures--Part II.
    English CE
    Dent Implantol Update; 1996 May; 7(5):38-40. PubMed ID: 9525182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Step-wise analysis of the dental implant insertion process using the finite element technique.
    van Staden RC; Guan H; Johnson NW; Loo YC; Meredith N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):303-13. PubMed ID: 18081871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prosthetically determined implant placement for the partially edentulous ridge: a reality today.
    Mason WE; Rugani FC
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 1999; 81(9):28, 30, 32, 34-7. PubMed ID: 10686930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.