These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30774180)

  • 1. Field Performance of a Novel Passive Bioaerosol Sampler using Polarized Ferroelectric Polymer Films.
    Therkorn J; Thomas N; Scheinbeim J; Mainelis G
    Aerosol Sci Technol; 2017; 51(7):787-800. PubMed ID: 30774180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Passive Bioaerosol Samplers: A Complementary Tool for Bioaerosol Research. A Review.
    Manibusan S; Mainelis G
    J Aerosol Sci; 2022 Jun; 163():. PubMed ID: 36386279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and initial testing of an active low-power, ferroelectric film-based bioaerosol sampler.
    Grogan SNCM; Han TT; Mainelis G
    Aerosol Sci Technol; 2022; 56(12):1132-1145. PubMed ID: 37168518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.
    Mbareche H; Veillette M; Bilodeau GJ; Duchaine C
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 84(23):. PubMed ID: 30217848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applicability of a modified MCE filter method with Button Inhalable Sampler for monitoring personal bioaerosol inhalation exposure.
    Xu Z; Xu H; Yao M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2013 May; 20(5):2963-72. PubMed ID: 23054771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
    An HR; Mainelis G; Yao M
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monitoring of bioaerosol inhalation risks in different environments using a six-stage Andersen sampler and the PCR-DGGE method.
    Xu Z; Yao M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2013 May; 185(5):3993-4003. PubMed ID: 22955887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Field evaluation of personal sampling methods for multiple bioaerosols.
    Wang CH; Chen BT; Han BC; Liu AC; Hung PC; Chen CY; Chao HJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120308. PubMed ID: 25799419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimization of a Portable Adenosine Triphosphate Bioluminescence Assay Coupled with a Receiver Operating Characteristic Model to Assess Bioaerosol Concentrations on Site.
    Tseng CC; Lu YC; Chang KC; Hung CC
    Microorganisms; 2020 Jun; 8(7):. PubMed ID: 32610699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sampling efficiency and nucleic acid stability during long-term sampling with different bioaerosol samplers.
    Bøifot KO; Skogan G; Dybwad M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2024 May; 196(6):577. PubMed ID: 38795190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comprehensive performance evaluation of six bioaerosol samplers based on an aerosol wind tunnel.
    Guo J; Lv M; Liu Z; Qin T; Qiu H; Zhang L; Lu J; Hu L; Yang W; Zhou D
    Environ Int; 2024 Jan; 183():108402. PubMed ID: 38150804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A high-flow portable biological aerosol trap (HighBioTrap) for rapid microbial detection.
    Chen H; Yao M
    J Aerosol Sci; 2018 Mar; 117():212-223. PubMed ID: 32372770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of flow cytometry for the assessment of preservation and recovery efficiency of bioaerosol samplers spiked with Pantoea agglomerans.
    Rule AM; Kesavan J; Schwab KJ; Buckley TJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Apr; 41(7):2467-72. PubMed ID: 17438801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of bioaerosol samplers for the detection and quantification of influenza virus from artificial aerosols and influenza virus-infected ferrets.
    Bekking C; Yip L; Groulx N; Doggett N; Finn M; Mubareka S
    Influenza Other Respir Viruses; 2019 Nov; 13(6):564-573. PubMed ID: 31541519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of airborne microbial communities using 16S ribosomal RNA: Potential bias due to air sampling stress.
    Zhen H; Krumins V; Fennell DE; Mainelis G
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Apr; 621():939-947. PubMed ID: 29079080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Field testing of a personal size-selective bioaerosol sampler.
    Kenny LC; Bowry A; Crook B; Stancliffe JD
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):393-404. PubMed ID: 10518465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molecular comparison of the sampling efficiency of four types of airborne bacterial samplers.
    Li K
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Nov; 409(24):5493-8. PubMed ID: 21968260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The adaptation of existing personal inhalable aerosol samplers for bioaerosol sampling.
    Kenny LC; Stancliffe JD; Crook B; Stagg S; Griffiths WD; Stewart IW; Futter SJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec; 59(12):831-41. PubMed ID: 9866164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of Air-O-Cell, Burkard, and Button Samplers for total enumeration of airborne spores.
    Aizenberg V; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA; Willeke K
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 11192220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.