These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30775055)
41. Reconstruction of Cranial Defects in Armed Forces Personnel - Our Experience. Bandyopadhyay TK; Thapliyal GK; Dubey AK Med J Armed Forces India; 2005 Jan; 61(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 27407702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Verifying three-dimensional skull model reconstruction using cranial index of symmetry. Kung WM; Chen ST; Lin CH; Lu YM; Chen TH; Lin MS PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e74267. PubMed ID: 24204566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Clinical Applications of Poly-Methyl-Methacrylate in Neurosurgery: The In Vivo Cranial Bone Reconstruction. Velnar T; Bosnjak R; Gradisnik L J Funct Biomater; 2022 Sep; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 36135591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Traumatic fracture of a polymethyl methacrylate patient-specific cranioplasty implant. Ko AL; Nerva JD; Chang JJ; Chesnut RM World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(3-4):536.e11-3. PubMed ID: 24056094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Patient-specific cranioplasty, by direct and indirect additive manufacturing of biopolymers and implantable materials. Flora B; Scerrati A; Trovalusci F; Vesco S Int J Med Robot; 2023 Dec; 19(6):e2568. PubMed ID: 37672203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Cranioplasty With a Customized Polymethylmethacrylate Implant Using a 3D Printer. Gorripati JP; Godbole Dubey SA Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50830. PubMed ID: 38249233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Revolutionizing Neurosurgery: The Cutting-Edge Era of Digitally Fabricated Cranial Stents. Beri A; Pisulkar SG; Iratwar S; Bansod A; Jain R; Shrivastava A Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e53482. PubMed ID: 38440041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. PMMA Cranioplasty Making by Using Оpen-Source CAD Software, PLA Printers, and Silicone Rubber Molds: Technical Note with Two Illustrative Cases. Malikov A; Secen AE; Ocal O; Divanlioglu D Asian J Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 17(2):317-323. PubMed ID: 36120609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Multidimensional evaluation of prosthetically rehabilitated\cranial defects using key behavior change inventory. Nagarajan T; Prakash P; Bhandari SK J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2021; 21(3):311-315. PubMed ID: 34380821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Translucent Customized Cranial Implants Made of Clear Polymethylmethacrylate: An Early Outcome Analysis of 55 Consecutive Cranioplasty Cases. Shay T; Mitchell KA; Belzberg M; Zelko I; Mahapatra S; Qian J; Mendoza L; Huang J; Brem H; Gordon C Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Dec; 85(6):e27-e36. PubMed ID: 33170582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Breaking Barriers in Cranioplasty: 3D Printing in Low and Middle-Income Settings-Insights from Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Bečulić H; Spahić D; Begagić E; Pugonja R; Skomorac R; Jusić A; Selimović E; Mašović A; Pojskić M Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Sep; 59(10):. PubMed ID: 37893450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Complications and Failures of Autologous Heterotopic Cranial Bone versus Alloplastic Cranioplasties. Oberoi MK; Mirzaie S; Huang KX; Caprini RM; Hu VJ; Dejam D; Ge S; Cronin BJ; Pfaff MJ; Lee JC Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37749784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]