141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30776091)
21. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Microcystic, elongated, and fragmented pattern invasion is mainly associated with isolated tumor cell pattern metastases in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade I endometrioid endometrial cancer.
Pelletier MP; Trinh VQ; Stephenson P; Mes-Masson AM; Samouelian V; Provencher DM; Rahimi K
Hum Pathol; 2017 Apr; 62():33-39. PubMed ID: 27864117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Analysis of patients with stage IIIC endometrial cancer.
Turan T; Ureyen I; Duzguner I; Ozkaya E; Tasci T; Karalok A; Boran N; Kose MF; Tulunay G
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Jul; 24(6):1033-41. PubMed ID: 24905617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Clinical implications of positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer].
Ren YL; Wang HY; Shan BE; Ping B; Shi DR
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 46(8):595-9. PubMed ID: 22169518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Systematic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in early stage epithelial ovarian cancer: a prospective study.
Ditto A; Martinelli F; Reato C; Kusamura S; Solima E; Fontanelli R; Haeusler E; Raspagliesi F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 19(12):3849-55. PubMed ID: 22707110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Stage II endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: clinical implications of cervical stromal invasion.
Orezzoli JP; Sioletic S; Olawaiye A; Oliva E; del Carmen MG
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 19345400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [What are the most appropriate operation procedures for endometrial cancer?].
Aoki D; Udagawa Y; Nozawa S
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1995 Aug; 22(9):1163-8. PubMed ID: 7661567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [The comparison of clinical and surgical-pathological staging for endometrial carcinoma].
Peng Z; Liu X; Zhang J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Oct; 32(10):597-600. PubMed ID: 9642375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of the laparoscopic versus conventional open method for surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.
Chu LH; Chang WC; Sheu BC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 55(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 27125400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prognostic significance and interobserver variability of histologic grading systems for endometrial carcinoma.
Scholten AN; Smit VT; Beerman H; van Putten WL; Creutzberg CL
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 14770433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Frozen section analyses as predictors of lymphatic spread in patients with early-stage uterine cancer.
Frumovitz M; Slomovitz BM; Singh DK; Broaddus RR; Abrams J; Sun CC; Bevers M; Bodurka DC
J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Sep; 199(3):388-93. PubMed ID: 15325608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Surgical staging for patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial carcinoma.
Ben-Shachar I; Pavelka J; Cohn DE; Copeland LJ; Ramirez N; Manolitsas T; Fowler JM
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):487-93. PubMed ID: 15738013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reproducibility of grading systems for endometrial endometrioid carcinoma and their relation with pathologic prognostic parameters.
Kapucuoglu N; Bulbul D; Tulunay G; Temel MA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2008; 18(4):790-6. PubMed ID: 17892460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinicopathological risk factors for pelvic lymph node metastasis in clinical early-stage endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Zhang C; Wang C; Feng W
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Oct; 22(8):1373-7. PubMed ID: 22932266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Chromosome aberrations [dup(1q)] in endometrial cancer: Gene analysis of 54 surgical specimens in Turkey.
Sever E; Döğer E; Kumbasar S; Şık BA; Temur M; Yılmaz HT; Yılmaz Ö; Özbay PO; Yücesoy İ
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 55(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 27343315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Lymph Node Involvement Pattern and Survival Differences of FIGO IIIC and FIGO IIIA1 Ovarian Cancer Patients After Primary Complete Tumor Debulking Surgery: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis of the Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer Network.
Gasimli K; Braicu EI; Nassir M; Richter R; Babayeva A; Chekerov R; Darb-Esfahani S; Sehouli J; Muallem MZ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 23(4):1279-86. PubMed ID: 26832880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The value of exploratory laparotomy in patients with endometrial carcinoma according to the new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging.
Vardi JR; Tadros GH; Anselmo MT; Rafla SD
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 1635733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Risk factors for paraaortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.
Sari ME; Yalcin İ; Sahin H; Meydanli MM; Gungor T
Int J Clin Oncol; 2017 Oct; 22(5):937-944. PubMed ID: 28523533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Impact of 2009 FIGO staging system on the diagnostic value of preoperative MRI staging of endometrial carcinoma].
Yu XD; Ouyang H; Lin M; Zhou CW; Zhang R
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 33(9):692-6. PubMed ID: 22340052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: implications for surgical staging.
Powless CA; Aletti GD; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Cliby WA
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):536-40. PubMed ID: 21636114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
