319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30776497)
1. Combined Laparoscopic Uterine Artery Occlusion and Myomectomy versus Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Direct-Comparison Meta-Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Women with Symptomatic Leiomyomas.
Tranoulis A; Georgiou D; Alazzam M; Borley J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):826-837. PubMed ID: 30776497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicentre study to evaluate the clinical effects of laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion in combination with myomectomy to treat symptomatic uterine leiomyomas.
Yang W; Cheng Z; Yu J; Yang H; Liu Z; Ren Q; Xu L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Sep; 204():9-15. PubMed ID: 27471836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids.
Bhave Chittawar P; Franik S; Pouwer AW; Farquhar C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):CD004638. PubMed ID: 25331441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical outcomes after uterine artery occlusion at the time of myomectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sanders AP; Chan WV; Tang J; Murji A
Fertil Steril; 2019 Apr; 111(4):816-827.e4. PubMed ID: 30661604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic uterine artery bipolar coagulation plus myomectomy vs traditional laparoscopic myomectomy for "large" uterine fibroids: comparison of clinical efficacy.
Ciavattini A; Clemente N; Delli Carpini G; Saccardi C; Borgato S; Litta P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Dec; 296(6):1167-1173. PubMed ID: 28956149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic Myomectomy with Temporary Bilateral Uterine Artery and Utero-Ovarian Vessels Occlusion Compared with Traditional Surgery for Uterine Fibroids: Blood Loss and Recurrence.
Jin L; Ji L; Shao M; Hu M
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2019; 84(6):548-554. PubMed ID: 30965324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In-bag manual versus uncontained power morcellation for laparoscopic myomectomy.
Zullo F; Venturella R; Raffone A; Saccone G
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 May; 5(5):CD013352. PubMed ID: 32374421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY WITH UTERINE ARTERY CLIPPING VERSUS CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY].
Blagovest B; Magunska N; Kovachev E; Ivanov S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2015; 54(7):8-10. PubMed ID: 27025101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of recurrence of uterine leiomyomas following laparoscopic myomectomy compared with open myomectomy.
Ming X; Ran XT; Li N; Nie D; Li ZY
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Jan; 301(1):235-242. PubMed ID: 31781891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY WITH UTERINE ARTERY CLIPPING VERSUS CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY].
Blagovest B; Magunska N; Kovachev E; Ivanov S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2015; 54(6):52-4. PubMed ID: 26817264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A case-control study to compare the outcome of women treated by two minimally invasive procedures-ultraminilaparotomy myomectomy and laparoscopic myomectomy.
Wen KC; Sung PL; Chang WH; Horng HC; Chen YJ; Lee WL; Wang PH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 57(2):264-269. PubMed ID: 29673671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects and costs of laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy in patients with uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen R; Su Z; Yang L; Xin L; Yuan X; Wang Y
BMC Surg; 2020 Mar; 20(1):55. PubMed ID: 32192462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-port access (SPA) laparoscopic myomectomy with uterine artery ligation via a retroperitoneal approach is feasible in women with large uterine leiomyoma.
Noh JJ; Kim J; Paik ES; Kang JH; Jeong SY; Choi CH; Lee YY; Lee JW; Kim BG; Bae DS; Kim TJ
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jul; 60(4):752-757. PubMed ID: 34247819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic temporary clipping of uterine artery during laparoscopic myomectomy.
Vercellino G; Erdemoglu E; Joe A; Hopfenmueller W; Holthaus B; Köhler C; Schneider A; Hasenbein K; Chiantera V
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1181-6. PubMed ID: 22714065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Laparoscopic Myomectomy with and without Uterine Artery Occlusion in Treatment of Symptomatic Multiple Myomas.
Peng Y; Cheng J; Zang C; Chen X; Wang J
Int J Gen Med; 2021; 14():1719-1725. PubMed ID: 33981159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of combined laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion and myomectomy via minilaparotomy in the treatment of recurrent uterine myomas.
Liu WM; Wang PH; Chou CS; Tang WL; Wang IT; Tzeng CR
Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):356-61. PubMed ID: 17069812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic-Assisted Myomectomy with Bilateral Uterine Artery Occlusion/Ligation.
MacKoul P; Baxi R; Danilyants N; van der Does LQ; Haworth LR; Kazi N
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):856-864. PubMed ID: 30170179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic myomectomy: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
Song T; Kim TJ; Lee SH; Kim TH; Kim WY
Fertil Steril; 2015 Nov; 104(5):1325-31. PubMed ID: 26263079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of preventive uterine artery occlusion during laparoscopic myomectomy: a review of the literature.
Dubuisson J; Ramyead L; Streuli I
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Apr; 291(4):737-43. PubMed ID: 25391639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic myomectomy: clinical outcomes and comparative evidence.
Buckley VA; Nesbitt-Hawes EM; Atkinson P; Won HR; Deans R; Burton A; Lyons SD; Abbott JA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 25117840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
