These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3077671)

  • 1. Glass ionomer materials in Class II composite resin restorations: to etch or not to etch?
    Garcia-Godoy F
    Quintessence Int; 1988 Mar; 19(3):241-2. PubMed ID: 3077671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations after rebonding.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Malone WF
    Compendium; 1987 Sep; 8(8):606-9. PubMed ID: 3315212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of four composite resins over a glass ionomer cement base in Class V restorations.
    Gordon M; Plasschaert AJ; Soelberg KB; Bogdan MS
    Quintessence Int; 1985 Dec; 16(12):817-20. PubMed ID: 3868783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A dangerous error: etching of glass ionomers in the sandwich technic].
    Goldberg M; Apap M
    Chir Dent Fr; 1987 Nov; 57(401):45-7. PubMed ID: 3329600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal seal of Class V composite/glass ionomer sandwich restorations.
    Shortall AC; Baylis RL; Grundy JR
    Restorative Dent; 1988 Nov; 4(4):80-1, 83-5, 87. PubMed ID: 3078060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Composite resin and glass-ionomer cement: current status for use in cervical restorations.
    Brackett WW; Robinson PB
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Jun; 21(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 2243948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Replacement of defective Class I amalgam restorations with stratified glass ionomer-composite resin materials.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1989 Oct; 20(10):711-6. PubMed ID: 2639386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glass-ionomer-resin restoration of primary molars with adjacent Class II carious lesions.
    Croll TP; Killian CM
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Oct; 24(10):723-7. PubMed ID: 8121987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical performance of Class II restorations in which resin composite is laminated over resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Aboush YE; Torabzadeh H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 11203844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of Class II resin composite restorations.
    Davidson CL; Abdalla AI
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 8329161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical performance of cervical restorations--a meta-analysis.
    Heintze SD; Ruffieux C; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2010 Oct; 26(10):993-1000. PubMed ID: 20638116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Glass ionomer-silver cermet bonded composite resin Class II tunnel restorations.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1988 Aug; 19(8):533-9. PubMed ID: 2978627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lateral-access Class II restoration using resin-modified glass-ionomer or silver-cermet cement.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7568722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of composite restorations with etched and non-etched glass ionomer bases.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Draheim RN; Titus HW; Chiesa D
    Am J Dent; 1988 Aug; 1(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 3073792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure.
    Malament KA; Socransky SS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 11725279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.