411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30776740)
1. Caring for women making unconventional birth choices: A meta-ethnography exploring the views, attitudes, and experiences of midwives.
Feeley C; Thomson G; Downe S
Midwifery; 2019 May; 72():50-59. PubMed ID: 30776740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A meta-ethnographic synthesis of midwives' and nurses' experiences of adverse labour and birth events.
Elmir R; Pangas J; Dahlen H; Schmied V
J Clin Nurs; 2017 Dec; 26(23-24):4184-4200. PubMed ID: 28722761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The experiences of midwives and nurses collaborating to provide birthing care: a systematic review.
Macdonald D; Snelgrove-Clarke E; Campbell-Yeo M; Aston M; Helwig M; Baker KA
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Nov; 13(11):74-127. PubMed ID: 26657466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Midwives' experience of personal/professional risk when providing continuity of care to women who decline recommendations: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.
Ford P; Crowther S; Waller N
Women Birth; 2023 Mar; 36(2):e283-e294. PubMed ID: 35869010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Socially disadvantaged women's views of barriers to feeling safe to engage in decision-making in maternity care.
Ebert L; Bellchambers H; Ferguson A; Browne J
Women Birth; 2014 Jun; 27(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 24355713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Midwives' perceptions of women's mobile phone use and impact on care in birth suite.
Lewis L; Barnes C; Allan J; Roberts L; Lube D; Hauck YL
Midwifery; 2019 Sep; 76():142-147. PubMed ID: 31207448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Midwives' and women's experiences with respectful maternity care around the globe: A meta-synthesis.
Shiindi-Mbidi TSN; Downing C; Temane A
Women Birth; 2023 Sep; 36(5):e461-e470. PubMed ID: 37149496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding how midwives employed by the National Health Service facilitate women's alternative birthing choices: Findings from a feminist pragmatist study.
Feeley C; Thomson G; Downe S
PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242508. PubMed ID: 33216777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Midwives' experiences of facilitating informed decision-making - a narrative literature review.
Kloester J; Willey S; Hall H; Brand G
Midwifery; 2022 Jun; 109():103322. PubMed ID: 35358936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bearing witness: midwives experiences of witnessing traumatic birth.
Rice H; Warland J
Midwifery; 2013 Sep; 29(9):1056-63. PubMed ID: 23415352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study.
Daemers DOA; van Limbeek EBM; Wijnen HAA; Nieuwenhuijze MJ; de Vries RG
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Oct; 17(1):345. PubMed ID: 28985725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The views and experiences of nurses and midwives in the provision and management of provider-initiated HIV testing and counseling: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.
Evans C; Nalubega S; McLuskey J; Darlington N; Croston M; Bath-Hextall F
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Jan; 13(12):130-286. PubMed ID: 26767819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a 'best fit' framework approach.
Coxon K; Chisholm A; Malouf R; Rowe R; Hollowell J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Mar; 17(1):103. PubMed ID: 28359258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Women's motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis.
Hollander M; de Miranda E; van Dillen J; de Graaf I; Vandenbussche F; Holten L
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Dec; 17(1):423. PubMed ID: 29246129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A qualitative study of factors that influence midwives' practice in relation to low-risk women's oral intake in labour in Australia.
Tadaumi M; Sweet L; Graham K
Women Birth; 2020 Sep; 33(5):e455-e463. PubMed ID: 31796342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cue acquisition: A feature of Malawian midwives decision making process to support normality during the first stage of labour.
Chodzaza E; Haycock-Stuart E; Holloway A; Mander R
Midwifery; 2018 Mar; 58():56-63. PubMed ID: 29306097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Able to choose? Women's thoughts and experiences regarding informed choices during birth.
Bringedal H; Aune I
Midwifery; 2019 Oct; 77():123-129. PubMed ID: 31323487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A qualitative study of volunteer doulas working alongside midwives at births in England: Mothers' and doulas' experiences.
McLeish J; Redshaw M
Midwifery; 2018 Jan; 56():53-60. PubMed ID: 29078074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A routine tool with far-reaching influence: Australian midwives' views on the use of ultrasound during pregnancy.
Edvardsson K; Mogren I; Lalos A; Persson M; Small R
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Aug; 15():195. PubMed ID: 26311437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Midwives' experiences of caring for pregnant women admitted to Ebola centres in Sierra Leone.
Erland E; Dahl B
Midwifery; 2017 Dec; 55():23-28. PubMed ID: 28915377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]