166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30777205)
41. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo MRI of the spine using parallel imaging.
Ruel L; Brugières P; Luciani A; Breil S; Mathieu D; Rahmouni A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):749-55. PubMed ID: 14975981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. High signal intensity of intervertebral calcified disks on T1-weighted MR images resulting from fat content.
Malghem J; Lecouvet FE; François R; Vande Berg BC; Duprez T; Cosnard G; Maldague BE
Skeletal Radiol; 2005 Feb; 34(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 15480646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Composition of MRI phantom equivalent to human tissues.
Kato H; Kuroda M; Yoshimura K; Yoshida A; Hanamoto K; Kawasaki S; Shibuya K; Kanazawa S
Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3199-208. PubMed ID: 16279073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Accuracy of flat panel detector CT with integrated navigational software with and without MR fusion for single-pass needle placement.
Mabray MC; Datta S; Lillaney PV; Moore T; Gehrisch S; Talbott JF; Levitt MR; Ghodke BV; Larson PS; Cooke DL
J Neurointerv Surg; 2016 Jul; 8(7):731-5. PubMed ID: 26047903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Accuracy of deformable image registration on magnetic resonance images in digital and physical phantoms.
Ger RB; Yang J; Ding Y; Jacobsen MC; Fuller CD; Howell RM; Li H; Jason Stafford R; Zhou S; Court LE
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5153-5161. PubMed ID: 28622410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Feasibility and potential value of flat-panel detector-based computed tomography in myelography after spinal surgery.
Kau T; Rabitsch E; Celedin S; Jeschofnig B; Illiasch H; Eicher W; Uhl E; Honl M; Hausegger KA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Jan; 10(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19119936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Bone material analogues for PET/MRI phantoms.
Chandramohan D; Cao P; Han M; An H; Sunderland JJ; Kinahan PE; Laforest R; Hope TA; Larson PEZ
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2161-2170. PubMed ID: 32034945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Flat-panel CT versus 128-slice CT in temporal bone imaging: Assessment of image quality and radiation dose.
Piergallini L; Scola E; Tuscano B; Brambilla R; Campoleoni M; Raimondi G; Lombardi L; Di Berardino F; Zanetti D; Sina C; Triulzi F; Conte G
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():106-113. PubMed ID: 30150031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Patient-specific pixel-based weighting factor dual-energy x-ray imaging system using a priori CT data.
Darvish-Molla S; Reno MC; Sattarivand M
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):528-543. PubMed ID: 30582871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Automated detection of spinal centrelines, vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs in CT and MR images of lumbar spine.
Stern D; Likar B; Pernus F; Vrtovec T
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 55(1):247-64. PubMed ID: 20009200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Optimization of the composition of phantom materials for computed tomography.
Homolka P; Gahleitner A; Prokop M; Nowotny R
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 47(16):2907-16. PubMed ID: 12222854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. CT-MR image data fusion for computer assisted navigated neurosurgery of temporal bone tumors.
Nemec SF; Donat MA; Mehrain S; Friedrich K; Krestan C; Matula C; Imhof H; Czerny C
Eur J Radiol; 2007 May; 62(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 17229539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Visibility and artifacts of gold fiducial markers used for image guided radiation therapy of pancreatic cancer on MRI.
Gurney-Champion OJ; Lens E; van der Horst A; Houweling AC; Klaassen R; van Hooft JE; Stoker J; van Tienhoven G; Nederveen AJ; Bel A
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2638-47. PubMed ID: 25979055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Robot arm based flat panel CT-guided electromagnetic tracked spine interventions: phantom and animal model experiments.
Penzkofer T; Isfort P; Bruners P; Wiemann C; Kyriakou Y; Kalender WA; Günther RW; Schmitz-Rode T; Mahnken AH
Eur Radiol; 2010 Nov; 20(11):2656-62. PubMed ID: 20567831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Towards improved hardware component attenuation correction in PET/MR hybrid imaging.
Paulus DH; Tellmann L; Quick HH
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 58(22):8021-40. PubMed ID: 24168832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A realistic phantom for validating MRI-based synthetic CT images of the human skull.
Soliman AS; Burns L; Owrangi A; Lee Y; Song WY; Stanisz G; Chugh BP
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4687-4694. PubMed ID: 28644905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Performance of whole-body integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR in comparison to PET/CT for evaluation of malignant bone lesions.
Eiber M; Takei T; Souvatzoglou M; Mayerhoefer ME; Fürst S; Gaertner FC; Loeffelbein DJ; Rummeny EJ; Ziegler SI; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ
J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 24309383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Continuous table acquisition MRI for radiotherapy treatment planning: distortion assessment with a new extended 3D volumetric phantom.
Walker A; Liney G; Holloway L; Dowling J; Rivest-Henault D; Metcalfe P
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1982-91. PubMed ID: 25832089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Assessment of whole spine vertebral bone marrow fat using chemical shift-encoding based water-fat MRI.
Baum T; Yap SP; Dieckmeyer M; Ruschke S; Eggers H; Kooijman H; Rummeny EJ; Bauer JS; Karampinos DC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(4):1018-23. PubMed ID: 25639780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
