150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30777238)
1. Design and Validation of Synchronous QCT Calibration Phantom: Practical Methodology.
Malekzadeh M; Abbasi-Rad S; Shahgholi M; Naghdi P; Hoseini MS; Yazdi NA; Shiran MB; Rad HS
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Mar; 50(1):157-162. PubMed ID: 30777238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Engelke K; Libanati C; Liu Y; Wang H; Austin M; Fuerst T; Stampa B; Timm W; Genant HK
Bone; 2009 Jul; 45(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 19345291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Liquid Calibration Phantoms in Ultra-Low-Dose QCT for the Assessment of Bone Mineral Density.
Malekzadeh M; Abbasi-Rad S; Keyak JH; Nabil M; Asadi M; Mobini N; Naghdi P; Emadi H; Saligheh Rad H; Shiran MB
J Clin Densitom; 2020; 23(1):108-116. PubMed ID: 30902572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative computed tomography: comparative study using different scanners with two calibration phantoms.
Suzuki S; Yamamuro T; Okumura H; Yamamoto I
Br J Radiol; 1991 Nov; 64(767):1001-6. PubMed ID: 1742578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and precision of volumetric bone mineral density assessment using dual-source dual-energy versus quantitative CT: a phantom study.
Koch V; Hokamp NG; Albrecht MH; Gruenewald LD; Yel I; Borggrefe J; Wesarg S; Eichler K; Burck I; Gruber-Rouh T; Lenga L; Vogl TJ; Martin SS; Wichmann JL; Hammerstingl RM; Alizadeh LS; Mader C; Huizinga NA; D'Angelo T; Ascenti G; Mazziotti S; Booz C
Eur Radiol Exp; 2021 Oct; 5(1):43. PubMed ID: 34608576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography.
Wang L; Su Y; Wang Q; Duanmu Y; Yang M; Yi C; Cheng X
Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):6284. PubMed ID: 28740145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standardizing CT lung density measure across scanner manufacturers.
Chen-Mayer HH; Fuld MK; Hoppel B; Judy PF; Sieren JP; Guo J; Lynch DA; Possolo A; Fain SB
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):974-985. PubMed ID: 28060414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the clinical utility of quantitative computed tomography with a routinely used diagnostic computed tomography scanner in a cancer center.
Hui SK; Weir VJ; Brown K; Froelich J
J Clin Densitom; 2011; 14(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 21295741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A calibration phantom system for QCT bone mineral density determination].
Yan Q; Yan L; Yang DZ; San HB; Yan ZF
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2005 May; 29(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 16124621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Scanner influence on the mechanical response of QCT-based finite element analysis of long bones.
Katz Y; Dahan G; Sosna J; Shelef I; Cherniavsky E; Yosibash Z
J Biomech; 2019 Mar; 86():149-159. PubMed ID: 30837081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Novel anthropomorphic hip phantom corrects systemic interscanner differences in proximal femoral vBMD.
Bonaretti S; Carpenter RD; Saeed I; Burghardt AJ; Yu L; Bruesewitz M; Khosla S; Lang T
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Dec; 59(24):7819-34. PubMed ID: 25419618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Semi-automatic proximal humeral trabecular bone density assessment tool: technique application and clinical validation.
Guo DM; Weng YZ; Yu ZH; Li SH; Qu WR; Liu XN; Qi H; Ma C; Tang XF; Li RY; Han Q; Xu H; Lu WW; Qin YG
Osteoporos Int; 2024 Jun; 35(6):1049-1059. PubMed ID: 38459138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Helical multidetector row quantitative computed tomography (QCT) precision.
Bligh M; Bidaut L; White RA; Murphy WA; Stevens DM; Cody DD
Acad Radiol; 2009 Feb; 16(2):150-9. PubMed ID: 19124100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy, Linearity and Precision of Spine QCT vBMD Phantom Measurements for Different Brands of CT Scanner: A Multicentre Study.
Zhao Y; Li K; Duanmu Y; Wang L; Xu X; Zhang Y; Tang J; Zhang Y; Li Z; Hind K; Blake GM; Cheng X
J Clin Densitom; 2022; 25(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 33745832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. European semi-anthropomorphic spine phantom for the calibration of bone densitometers: assessment of precision, stability and accuracy. The European Quantitation of Osteoporosis Study Group.
Pearson J; Dequeker J; Henley M; Bright J; Reeve J; Kalender W; Laval-Jeantet AM; Rüegsegger P; Felsenberg D; Adams J
Osteoporos Int; 1995 May; 5(3):174-84. PubMed ID: 7655178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Asynchronously Calibrated Quantitative Bone Densitometry.
Brown JK; Timm W; Bodeen G; Chason A; Perry M; Vernacchia F; DeJournett R
J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(2):216-225. PubMed ID: 26781430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative PET/CT scanner performance characterization based upon the society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging clinical trials network oncology clinical simulator phantom.
Sunderland JJ; Christian PE
J Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 56(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 25525180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automatic phantom-less QCT system with high precision of BMD measurement for osteoporosis screening: Technique optimisation and clinical validation.
Liu ZJ; Zhang C; Ma C; Qi H; Yang ZH; Wu HY; Yang KD; Lin JY; Wong TM; Li ZY; Li CH; Ding Y
J Orthop Translat; 2022 Mar; 33():24-30. PubMed ID: 35228994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lumbar Bone Mineral Density Phantomless Computed Tomography Measurements and Correlation with Age and Fracture Incidence.
Weaver AA; Beavers KM; Hightower RC; Lynch SK; Miller AN; Stitzel JD
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2(0 2):S153-60. PubMed ID: 26436225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength-Inter-operator reanalysis precision.
Lee DC; Hoffmann PF; Kopperdahl DL; Keaveny TM
Bone; 2017 Oct; 103():325-333. PubMed ID: 28778598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
