These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30777460)
1. Development of a three-dimensional body shape model of young children for child restraint design. Jones MLH; Ebert SM; Reed MP; Klinich KD Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Nov; 21(15):784-794. PubMed ID: 30777460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A parametric model of child body shape in seated postures. Park BD; Ebert S; Reed MP Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Jul; 18(5):533-536. PubMed ID: 27936912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parametric body shape model of standing children aged 3-11 years. Park BK; Reed MP Ergonomics; 2015; 58(10):1714-25. PubMed ID: 25933223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A parametric modeling of adult body shape in a supported seated posture including effects of age. Park BD; Jones MLH; Ebert S; Reed MP Ergonomics; 2022 Jun; 65(6):795-803. PubMed ID: 34632947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Child body shape measurement using depth cameras and a statistical body shape model. Park BK; Lumeng JC; Lumeng CN; Ebert SM; Reed MP Ergonomics; 2015; 58(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 25323820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Kinematics of child volunteers and child anthropomorphic test devices during emergency braking events in real car environment. Stockman I; Bohman K; Jakobsson L; Brolin K Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 23259524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Posture normalisation of 3D body scans. Danckaers F; Huysmans T; Hallemans A; De Bruyne G; Truijen S; Sijbers J Ergonomics; 2019 Jun; 62(6):834-848. PubMed ID: 30777506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anthropometric specification of child crash dummy pelves through statistical analysis of skeletal geometry. Reed MP; Sochor MM; Rupp JD; Klinich KD; Manary MA J Biomech; 2009 May; 42(8):1143-5. PubMed ID: 19356764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in the kinematics of booster-seated pediatric occupants using two different car seats. Juste-Lorente O; Maza M; Lorente AI; Lopez-Valdes FJ Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 28594247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a finite element/multi-body model of a newborn infant for restraint analysis and design. Bondy M; Altenhof W; Chen X; Snowdon A; Vrkljan B Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014; 17(2):149-62. PubMed ID: 22512507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Naturalistic driving study of rear seat child occupants: Quantification of head position using a Kinectâ„¢ sensor. Arbogast KB; Kim J; Loeb H; Kuo J; Koppel S; Bohman K; Charlton JL Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():168-74. PubMed ID: 27586119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of child restraint lower attachment method on protection offered by forward facing child restraint systems in oblique loading conditions. Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 29584498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scaling approach in predicting the seatbelt loading and kinematics of vulnerable occupants: How far can we go? Nie B; Forman JL; Joodaki H; Wu T; Kent RW Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():93-100. PubMed ID: 27586109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and testing of a more realistic pelvis for the Hybrid III 6-year-old ATD. Klinich KD; Reed MP; Manary MA; Orton NR Traffic Inj Prev; 2010 Dec; 11(6):606-12. PubMed ID: 21128191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variations in rear seat cushion properties and the effects on submarining. Beck B; Brown J; Bilston LE Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Feb; 12(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 21259174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated recognition of rear seat occupants' head position using Kinectâ„¢ 3D point cloud. Loeb H; Kim J; Arbogast K; Kuo J; Koppel S; Cross S; Charlton J J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():135-143. PubMed ID: 29203011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling spatial trajectories in dynamics testing using basis splines: application to tracking human volunteers in low-speed frontal impacts. Samuels MA; Reed MP; Arbogast KB; Seacrist T Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016; 19(10):1046-52. PubMed ID: 26428257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rear seat restraint system optimization for older children in frontal crashes. Hu J; Wu J; Reed MP; Klinich KD; Cao L Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 23859119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Influence of Enhanced Side Impact Protection on Kinematics and Injury Measures of Far- or Center-Seated Children in Forward-Facing Child Restraints. Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S9-S15. PubMed ID: 26436248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]