These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30777594)

  • 1. [The effect of primary colonoscopy versus follow-up colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer].
    Krøijer R; Baatrup G
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2019 Feb; 181(7):. PubMed ID: 30777594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk stratification and detection of new colorectal neoplasms after colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood test: experiences from a Danish screening cohort.
    Bjerrum A; Milter MC; Andersen O; Fischer A; Lynge E
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Dec; 27(12):1433-7. PubMed ID: 26352132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).
    Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M;
    Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Participation and yield of a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme in China.
    Chen H; Li N; Ren J; Feng X; Lyu Z; Wei L; Li X; Guo L; Zheng Z; Zou S; Zhang Y; Li J; Zhang K; Chen W; Dai M; He J;
    Gut; 2019 Aug; 68(8):1450-1457. PubMed ID: 30377193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of personalised risk information compared to a positive/negative result on informed choice and intention to undergo colonoscopy following colorectal Cancer screening in Scotland (PERICCS) - a randomised controlled trial: study protocol.
    Steele RJC; Digby J; Chambers JA; O'Carroll RE
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):411. PubMed ID: 30991987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic yield of a one sample immunochemical test at different cut-off values in an organised screening programme for colorectal cancer.
    Hamza S; Dancourt V; Lejeune C; Bidan JM; Lepage C; Faivre J
    Eur J Cancer; 2013 Aug; 49(12):2727-33. PubMed ID: 23601670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Colorectal cancer screening in the Netherlands: which faecal occult blood test?].
    Jansen JB; Blankenstein RM; Mulder CJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2013; 157(16):A5744. PubMed ID: 23594870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interval faecal occult blood testing in a colonoscopy based screening programme detects additional pathology.
    Bampton PA; Sandford JJ; Cole SR; Smith A; Morcom J; Cadd B; Young GP
    Gut; 2005 Jun; 54(6):803-6. PubMed ID: 15888788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Faecal occult blood test-based screening programme with high compliance for colonoscopy has a strong clinical impact on colorectal cancer (Br J Surg 2009; 96: 533-540).
    Nash GF
    Br J Surg; 2009 Aug; 96(8):956-7; author reply 957. PubMed ID: 19591144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Faecal immunochemical tests versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests: what clinicians and colorectal cancer screening programme organisers need to know.
    Tinmouth J; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Allison JE
    Gut; 2015 Aug; 64(8):1327-37. PubMed ID: 26041750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alternatives to colonoscopy for population-wide colorectal cancer screening.
    Leung WC; Foo DC; Chan TT; Chiang MF; Lam AH; Chan HH; Cheung CC
    Hong Kong Med J; 2016 Feb; 22(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 26744124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes.
    Schreuders EH; Ruco A; Rabeneck L; Schoen RE; Sung JJ; Young GP; Kuipers EJ
    Gut; 2015 Oct; 64(10):1637-49. PubMed ID: 26041752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why do some participants in colorectal cancer screening choose not to undergo colonoscopy following a positive test result? A qualitative study.
    Bie AKL; Brodersen J
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2018 Sep; 36(3):262-271. PubMed ID: 30238859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An analysis of the duplicate testing strategy of an Irish immunochemical faecal occult blood test colorectal cancer screening programme.
    Kelley L; Swan N; Hughes DJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2013 Sep; 15(9):e512-21. PubMed ID: 23746062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Colorectal cancers detected through screening are associated with lower stages and improved survival.
    Lindebjerg J; Osler M; Bisgaard C
    Dan Med J; 2014 Jan; 61(1):A4758. PubMed ID: 24393588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy in a Danish gFOBT screening cohort.
    Bjerrum A; Andersen O; Fischer A; Lindebjerg J; Lynge E
    Int J Cancer; 2017 Aug; 141(3):503-511. PubMed ID: 28463410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementation of immunochemical faecal occult blood test in general practice: a study protocol using a cluster-randomised stepped-wedge design.
    Juul JS; Bro F; Hornung N; Andersen BS; Laurberg S; Olesen F; Vedsted P
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():445. PubMed ID: 27400657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Superior diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin in a head-to-head comparison with guaiac based faecal occult blood test among 2235 participants of screening colonoscopy.
    Brenner H; Tao S
    Eur J Cancer; 2013 Sep; 49(14):3049-54. PubMed ID: 23706981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Population-based screening for colorectal cancer using an immunochemical faecal occult blood test: a comparison of two invitation strategies.
    Van Roosbroeck S; Hoeck S; Van Hal G
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 22560885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contribution of patient, physician, and environmental factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up for abnormal colorectal cancer screening test results.
    Partin MR; Gravely AA; Burgess JF; Haggstrom DA; Lillie SE; Nelson DB; Nugent SM; Shaukat A; Sultan S; Walter LC; Burgess DJ
    Cancer; 2017 Sep; 123(18):3502-3512. PubMed ID: 28493543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.