266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30778935)
1. Oxygen transfer improvement in MBBR process.
Collivignarelli MC; Abbà A; Bertanza G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Apr; 26(11):10727-10737. PubMed ID: 30778935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Energy, cost and design aspects of coarse- and fine-bubble aeration systems in the MBBR IFAS process.
Sander S; Behnisch J; Wagner M
Water Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 75(3-4):890-897. PubMed ID: 28234289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of the external mass transfer coefficient and influence of mixing intensity in moving bed biofilm reactors for wastewater treatment.
Nogueira BL; Pérez J; van Loosdrecht MC; Secchi AR; Dezotti M; Biscaia EC
Water Res; 2015 Sep; 80():90-8. PubMed ID: 25996756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Linking biofilm growth to fouling and aeration performance of fine-pore diffuser in activated sludge.
Garrido-Baserba M; Asvapathanagul P; McCarthy GW; Gocke TE; Olson BH; Park HD; Al-Omari A; Murthy S; Bott CB; Wett B; Smeraldi JD; Shaw AR; Rosso D
Water Res; 2016 Mar; 90():317-328. PubMed ID: 26760484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oxygen Transfer in Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor and Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge Processes.
Daigger GT; Boltz JP
Water Environ Res; 2018 Jul; 90(7):615-622. PubMed ID: 29149918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oxygen transfer comparison of jets and coarse bubble aeration in concentrated sludge.
Steele P; Warner R; Rosso D
Water Environ Res; 2023 May; 95(5):e10869. PubMed ID: 37085332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Municipal wastewater treatment by moving-bed-biofilm reactor with diatomaceous earth as carriers.
Zhao Y; Cao D; Liu L; Jin W
Water Environ Res; 2006 Apr; 78(4):392-6. PubMed ID: 16749307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aeration of large-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants: state of the art.
Rosso D; Stenstrom MK; Larson LE
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(7):973-8. PubMed ID: 18441421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimizing aeration rates for minimizing membrane fouling and its effect on sludge characteristics in a moving bed membrane bioreactor.
Rahimi Y; Torabian A; Mehrdadi N; Habibi-Rezaie M; Pezeshk H; Nabi-Bidhendi GR
J Hazard Mater; 2011 Feb; 186(2-3):1097-102. PubMed ID: 21168965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Start-up of membrane bioreactor and hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor: kinetic study.
Leyva-Díaz JC; Poyatos JM
Water Sci Technol; 2015; 72(11):1948-53. PubMed ID: 26606088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of a fixed-bed biofilm reactor with microbubble aeration in aerobic wastewater treatment.
Zhang L; Liu J; Liu C; Zhang J; Yang J
Water Sci Technol; 2016; 74(1):138-46. PubMed ID: 27386991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in moving bed bioreactor and other biological systems.
Bhattacharya R; Mazumder D
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2021 Apr; 44(4):635-652. PubMed ID: 33387005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of oxygen transfer rates in full scale membrane bioreactors.
Cornel P; Wagner M; Krause S
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):313-9. PubMed ID: 12906305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-strength wastewater treatment using microbial biofilm reactor: a critical review.
Abdelfattah A; Hossain MI; Cheng L
World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2020 May; 36(5):75. PubMed ID: 32390104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of process design and operating parameters on aerobic methane oxidation in municipal WWTPs.
Daelman MRJ; Van Eynde T; van Loosdrecht MCM; Volcke EIP
Water Res; 2014 Dec; 66():308-319. PubMed ID: 25225767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biodegradation of benzotriazoles and hydroxy-benzothiazole in wastewater by activated sludge and moving bed biofilm reactor systems.
Mazioti AA; Stasinakis AS; Pantazi Y; Andersen HR
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Sep; 192():627-35. PubMed ID: 26093257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Towards improved accuracy in modeling aeration efficiency through understanding bubble size distribution dynamics.
Amaral A; Bellandi G; Rehman U; Neves R; Amerlinck Y; Nopens I
Water Res; 2018 Mar; 131():346-355. PubMed ID: 29305229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oxygen transfer and uptake, nutrient removal, and energy footprint of parallel full-scale IFAS and activated sludge processes.
Rosso D; Lothman SE; Jeung MK; Pitt P; Gellner WJ; Stone AL; Howard D
Water Res; 2011 Nov; 45(18):5987-96. PubMed ID: 21940032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of hybrid fixed and moving bed biofilm applications for wastewater treatment capacity increase - In situ tests in El-Gouna WWTP, Egypt.
Riechelmann C; Habashy MM; Rene ER; Moussa MS; Hosney H
Chemosphere; 2024 May; 355():139783. PubMed ID: 37574084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
