369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30779042)
1. Evaluation of Whole Genome Sequencing Data.
Hübschmann D; Schlesner M
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1956():321-336. PubMed ID: 30779042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Whole-genome sequencing is more powerful than whole-exome sequencing for detecting exome variants.
Belkadi A; Bolze A; Itan Y; Cobat A; Vincent QB; Antipenko A; Shang L; Boisson B; Casanova JL; Abel L
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Apr; 112(17):5473-8. PubMed ID: 25827230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mendelian Inconsistent Signatures from 1314 Ancestrally Diverse Family Trios Distinguish Biological Variation from Sequencing Error.
Kothiyal P; Wong WSW; Bodian DL; Niederhuber JE
J Comput Biol; 2019 May; 26(5):405-419. PubMed ID: 30942611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Empirical evaluation of variant calling accuracy using ultra-deep whole-genome sequencing data.
Kishikawa T; Momozawa Y; Ozeki T; Mushiroda T; Inohara H; Kamatani Y; Kubo M; Okada Y
Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1784. PubMed ID: 30741997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of sequencing coverage and genotyping strategies to assess neutral and adaptive diversity.
Benjelloun B; Boyer F; Streeter I; Zamani W; Engelen S; Alberti A; Alberto FJ; BenBati M; Ibnelbachyr M; Chentouf M; Bechchari A; Rezaei HR; Naderi S; Stella A; Chikhi A; Clarke L; Kijas J; Flicek P; Taberlet P; Pompanon F
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Nov; 19(6):1497-1515. PubMed ID: 31359622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using genotype array data to compare multi- and single-sample variant calls and improve variant call sets from deep coverage whole-genome sequencing data.
Shringarpure SS; Mathias RA; Hernandez RD; O'Connor TD; Szpiech ZA; Torres R; De La Vega FM; Bustamante CD; Barnes KC; Taub MA;
Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(8):1147-1153. PubMed ID: 28035032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Whole genome sequencing analysis for cancer genomics and precision medicine.
Nakagawa H; Fujita M
Cancer Sci; 2018 Mar; 109(3):513-522. PubMed ID: 29345757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analytical and Clinical Validation of a Target-Enhanced Whole Genome Sequencing-Based Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Test.
Ferguson S; Sriram S; Wallace JK; Lee J; Kim JA; Lee Y; Oh BB; Lee WC; Lee S; Connolly-Strong E
Cancer Invest; 2024 May; 42(5):390-399. PubMed ID: 38773925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of Genomic Alterations Through Multilevel DNA Structural Analysis.
Shultzaberger RK; Dresios J
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1896():191-201. PubMed ID: 30474849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Archived neonatal dried blood spot samples can be used for accurate whole genome and exome-targeted next-generation sequencing.
Hollegaard MV; Grauholm J; Nielsen R; Grove J; Mandrup S; Hougaard DM
Mol Genet Metab; 2013; 110(1-2):65-72. PubMed ID: 23830478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preprocessing and Quality Control for Whole-Genome Sequences from the Illumina HiSeq X Platform.
Wright MN; Gola D; Ziegler A
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():629-647. PubMed ID: 28980267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genome Sequencing and Analysis Methods in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.
Quesada V; Araujo-Voces M; Pérez-Silva JG; Velasco G; López-Otín C
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1881():319-325. PubMed ID: 30350214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Whole Genome Sequence Analysis and Population Genomics of Group A Streptococci.
Lacey JA; James TB; Tong SYC; Davies MR
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2136():81-111. PubMed ID: 32430815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis of whole-genome sequencing pipelines to minimize false negative findings.
Hwang KB; Lee IH; Li H; Won DG; Hernandez-Ferrer C; Negron JA; Kong SW
Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):3219. PubMed ID: 30824715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A simple and accurate method to determine genomewide significance for association tests in sequencing studies.
Lin DY
Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 43(4):365-372. PubMed ID: 30623491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and efficiency of germline variant calling pipelines for human genome data.
Zhao S; Agafonov O; Azab A; Stokowy T; Hovig E
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):20222. PubMed ID: 33214604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Joint variant and de novo mutation identification on pedigrees from high-throughput sequencing data.
Cleary JG; Braithwaite R; Gaastra K; Hilbush BS; Inglis S; Irvine SA; Jackson A; Littin R; Nohzadeh-Malakshah S; Rathod M; Ware D; Trigg L; De La Vega FM
J Comput Biol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):405-19. PubMed ID: 24874280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Opportunities and challenges of whole-genome and -exome sequencing.
Petersen BS; Fredrich B; Hoeppner MP; Ellinghaus D; Franke A
BMC Genet; 2017 Feb; 18(1):14. PubMed ID: 28193154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Whole-exome sequencing reveals recurrent somatic mutation networks in cancer.
Liu X; Wang J; Chen L
Cancer Lett; 2013 Nov; 340(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 23153794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative investigation of single nucleotide variant calling for a personal non-Caucasian sequencing sample.
Park H; Gim J
Genes Genomics; 2023 Dec; 45(12):1527-1536. PubMed ID: 37651066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
