These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30779423)
1. Comparison of the bone marrow trephine sample quality between OnControl drill system and the Jamshidi needle. Forwood KM; Lee E; Crispin PJ Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Jun; 41(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 30779423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone marrow biopsies performed by both the powered OnControl drill device and the Jamshidi needle produce adequate specimens. Jain S; Enzerra M; Mehta RS; Smith R; Djokic M J Clin Pathol; 2017 Jun; 70(6):541-543. PubMed ID: 28062659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Audit of bone marrow trephines. Bishop PW; McNally K; Harris M J Clin Pathol; 1992 Dec; 45(12):1105-8. PubMed ID: 1479037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adequacy of powered vs manual bone marrow biopsy specimens: a retrospective review of sequential marrow aspirates and biopsies in 68 patients. Lynch DW; Stauffer SL; Rosenthal NS Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Apr; 143(4):535-9. PubMed ID: 25780005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histologic examination of the bone marrow: aspiration or trephine? Mark T; Levin A South Med J; 1981 Dec; 74(12):1447-50. PubMed ID: 7313733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective randomised study of a rotary powered device (OnControl) for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy. Swords RT; Anguita J; Higgins RA; Yunes AC; Naski M; Padmanabhan S; Kelly KR; Mahalingam D; Philbeck T; Miller L; Puga TA; Giles FJ; Kinney MC; Brenner AJ J Clin Pathol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):809-13. PubMed ID: 21606230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone marrow solid core biopsy needle: a critical assessment of the utility, benefits and limitations of the instruments employed in current day haematology and oncology. Islam A J Clin Pathol; 2018 Jun; 71(6):475-482. PubMed ID: 29217729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The diagnostic utility of bone marrow trephine biopsies. Sitalakshmi S; Srikrishna A; Devi S; Damodar P; Alexander B Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2005 Apr; 48(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 16758657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ICSH guidelines for the standardization of bone marrow specimens and reports. Lee SH; Erber WN; Porwit A; Tomonaga M; Peterson LC; Int J Lab Hematol; 2008 Oct; 30(5):349-64. PubMed ID: 18822060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone marrow trephine biopsy involvement by lymphoma: review of histopathological features in 511 specimens and correlation with diagnostic biopsy, aspirate and peripheral blood findings. Sovani V; Harvey C; Haynes AP; McMillan AK; Clark DM; O'Connor SR J Clin Pathol; 2014 May; 67(5):389-95. PubMed ID: 24327662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone marrow examination in small cell carcinoma of the lung. Comparison of trephine biopsy with aspiration. Lawrence JB; Eleff M; Behm FG; Johnston CL Cancer; 1984 May; 53(10):2188-90. PubMed ID: 6322959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rotary powered device for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy yields excellent specimens quickly and efficiently. Swords RT; Kelly KR; Cohen SC; Miller LJ; Philbeck TE; Hacker SO; Spadaccini CJ; Giles FJ; Brenner AJ J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 63(6):562-5. PubMed ID: 20404008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and safety of bone marrow aspiration and biopsy using fluoroscopic guidance and a drill-powered needle: clinical experience from 775 cases. Long JR; Stensby JD; Wiesner EL; Bryson WN; Hillen TJ; Jennings JW Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5964-5970. PubMed ID: 32518988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of bone marrow invasion by neuroblastoma is improved by sampling at two sites with both aspirates and trephine biopsies. Franklin IM; Pritchard J J Clin Pathol; 1983 Nov; 36(11):1215-8. PubMed ID: 6630571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of a powered bone marrow biopsy device with a manual system: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. Bucher CM; Lehmann T; Tichelli A; Tzankov A; Dirnhofer S; Passweg J; Rovó A J Clin Pathol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 23105124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of bone marrow trephine sample quality between a drill-powered system and a manual needle system. Mihailescu SD; Jaselme P; Fontoura ML; Feddag-Hannachi L; Veresezan EL; Drieux F; Camus V; Bouclet F; Tilly H; Cardinaël N; Jardin F Ann Diagn Pathol; 2022 Aug; 59():151952. PubMed ID: 35468352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flow Cytometric Analysis of Mechanically Disaggregated Bone Marrow Trephine Biopsies. Wheeler M; White G; Brockie S; Dickson M; Weinkove R Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2018 Nov; 94(6):935-940. PubMed ID: 30350400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The comparative values of bone marrow aspirate and trephine for obtaining bone scan-targeted metastases from hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Brown RS; Dogan A; Ell PJ; Payne HA; Masters JR; Harland SJ Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 12497005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of bone marrow aspirate particle smears, imprints and biopsy sections. Sabharwal BD; Malhotra V; Aruna S; Grewal R J Postgrad Med; 1990 Oct; 36(4):194-8. PubMed ID: 2132243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of relative value of bone marrow aspirates and bone marrow trephine biopsies in the diagnosis of solid tumor metastasis and Hodgkin lymphoma: institutional experience and literature review. Moid F; DePalma L Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Apr; 129(4):497-501. PubMed ID: 15794673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]