201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30779423)
1. Comparison of the bone marrow trephine sample quality between OnControl drill system and the Jamshidi needle.
Forwood KM; Lee E; Crispin PJ
Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Jun; 41(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 30779423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone marrow biopsies performed by both the powered OnControl drill device and the Jamshidi needle produce adequate specimens.
Jain S; Enzerra M; Mehta RS; Smith R; Djokic M
J Clin Pathol; 2017 Jun; 70(6):541-543. PubMed ID: 28062659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Audit of bone marrow trephines.
Bishop PW; McNally K; Harris M
J Clin Pathol; 1992 Dec; 45(12):1105-8. PubMed ID: 1479037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adequacy of powered vs manual bone marrow biopsy specimens: a retrospective review of sequential marrow aspirates and biopsies in 68 patients.
Lynch DW; Stauffer SL; Rosenthal NS
Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Apr; 143(4):535-9. PubMed ID: 25780005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histologic examination of the bone marrow: aspiration or trephine?
Mark T; Levin A
South Med J; 1981 Dec; 74(12):1447-50. PubMed ID: 7313733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective randomised study of a rotary powered device (OnControl) for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy.
Swords RT; Anguita J; Higgins RA; Yunes AC; Naski M; Padmanabhan S; Kelly KR; Mahalingam D; Philbeck T; Miller L; Puga TA; Giles FJ; Kinney MC; Brenner AJ
J Clin Pathol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):809-13. PubMed ID: 21606230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone marrow solid core biopsy needle: a critical assessment of the utility, benefits and limitations of the instruments employed in current day haematology and oncology.
Islam A
J Clin Pathol; 2018 Jun; 71(6):475-482. PubMed ID: 29217729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The diagnostic utility of bone marrow trephine biopsies.
Sitalakshmi S; Srikrishna A; Devi S; Damodar P; Alexander B
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2005 Apr; 48(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 16758657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ICSH guidelines for the standardization of bone marrow specimens and reports.
Lee SH; Erber WN; Porwit A; Tomonaga M; Peterson LC;
Int J Lab Hematol; 2008 Oct; 30(5):349-64. PubMed ID: 18822060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone marrow trephine biopsy involvement by lymphoma: review of histopathological features in 511 specimens and correlation with diagnostic biopsy, aspirate and peripheral blood findings.
Sovani V; Harvey C; Haynes AP; McMillan AK; Clark DM; O'Connor SR
J Clin Pathol; 2014 May; 67(5):389-95. PubMed ID: 24327662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone marrow examination in small cell carcinoma of the lung. Comparison of trephine biopsy with aspiration.
Lawrence JB; Eleff M; Behm FG; Johnston CL
Cancer; 1984 May; 53(10):2188-90. PubMed ID: 6322959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rotary powered device for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy yields excellent specimens quickly and efficiently.
Swords RT; Kelly KR; Cohen SC; Miller LJ; Philbeck TE; Hacker SO; Spadaccini CJ; Giles FJ; Brenner AJ
J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 63(6):562-5. PubMed ID: 20404008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and safety of bone marrow aspiration and biopsy using fluoroscopic guidance and a drill-powered needle: clinical experience from 775 cases.
Long JR; Stensby JD; Wiesner EL; Bryson WN; Hillen TJ; Jennings JW
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5964-5970. PubMed ID: 32518988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of bone marrow invasion by neuroblastoma is improved by sampling at two sites with both aspirates and trephine biopsies.
Franklin IM; Pritchard J
J Clin Pathol; 1983 Nov; 36(11):1215-8. PubMed ID: 6630571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of a powered bone marrow biopsy device with a manual system: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial.
Bucher CM; Lehmann T; Tichelli A; Tzankov A; Dirnhofer S; Passweg J; Rovó A
J Clin Pathol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 23105124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of bone marrow trephine sample quality between a drill-powered system and a manual needle system.
Mihailescu SD; Jaselme P; Fontoura ML; Feddag-Hannachi L; Veresezan EL; Drieux F; Camus V; Bouclet F; Tilly H; Cardinaël N; Jardin F
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2022 Aug; 59():151952. PubMed ID: 35468352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flow Cytometric Analysis of Mechanically Disaggregated Bone Marrow Trephine Biopsies.
Wheeler M; White G; Brockie S; Dickson M; Weinkove R
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2018 Nov; 94(6):935-940. PubMed ID: 30350400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The comparative values of bone marrow aspirate and trephine for obtaining bone scan-targeted metastases from hormone-refractory prostate cancer.
Brown RS; Dogan A; Ell PJ; Payne HA; Masters JR; Harland SJ
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 12497005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of bone marrow aspirate particle smears, imprints and biopsy sections.
Sabharwal BD; Malhotra V; Aruna S; Grewal R
J Postgrad Med; 1990 Oct; 36(4):194-8. PubMed ID: 2132243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of relative value of bone marrow aspirates and bone marrow trephine biopsies in the diagnosis of solid tumor metastasis and Hodgkin lymphoma: institutional experience and literature review.
Moid F; DePalma L
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Apr; 129(4):497-501. PubMed ID: 15794673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
