142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30779495)
1. Clinical Performance of Nanofilled and Microhybrid Direct Composite Restorations on Endodontically Treated Teeth.
Akalιn TT; Bozkurt FO; Tuncer AK; Bağ HG; Özcan M
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 Feb; 27(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 30779495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.
Sadeghi M; Lynch CD; Shahamat N
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 20202097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-year clinical evaluation of nonvital tooth whitening and resin composite restorations.
Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(6):369-78; discussion 379. PubMed ID: 16417833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage resin composite in endodontically treated premolars: 3-year follow-up.
Gönülol N; Kalyoncuoğlu E; Ertaş E; Misilli T
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2323-2330. PubMed ID: 30293184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal quality of posterior microhybrid resin composite restorations applied using two polymerisation protocols: 5-year randomised split mouth trial.
Barabanti N; Gagliani M; Roulet JF; Testori T; Ozcan M; Cerutti A
J Dent; 2013 May; 41(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 23454329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations.
Yazici AR; Ustunkol I; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
Kiremitci A; Alpaslan T; Gurgan S
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of microhybrid composites in noncarious cervical lesions: 24-month results.
Tuncer D; Çelik C; Yamanel K; Arhun N
Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Feb; 20(2):176-181. PubMed ID: 28091433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reconstruction of nonvital teeth using direct fiber-reinforced composite resin: a pilot clinical study.
Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
J Adhes Dent; 2009 Feb; 11(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 19343930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Evaluation of Silorane and Nano-hybrid Resin Composite Restorations in Class II Cavities up to 3 Years.
Öztürk-Bozkurt F; Toz T; Kara-Tuncer A; Gözükara-Bağ H; Özcan M
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(6):599-606. PubMed ID: 27589274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical Performance and Epidemiologic Aspects of Fractured Anterior Teeth Restored with a Composite Resin: A Two-Year Clinical Study.
Vural UK; Kiremitçi A; Gökalp S
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e204-e209. PubMed ID: 28960769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical performance of ormocer, nanofilled, and nanoceramic resin composites in Class I and Class II restorations: a three-year evaluation.
Mahmoud SH; El-Embaby AE; AbdAllah AM
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 23614660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth.
Can Say E; Kayahan B; Ozel E; Gokce K; Soyman M; Bayirli G
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 May; 7(2):17-25. PubMed ID: 16685291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Five-year Clinical Evaluation of a Nanofilled and a Nanohybrid Composite in Class IV Cavities.
Demirci M; Tuncer S; Sancakli HS; Tekçe N; Baydemir C
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(3):261-271. PubMed ID: 29533716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.
Loguercio AD; Reis A; Barbosa AN; Roulet JF
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical Performance of Posterior Microhybrid Resin Composite Restorations Applied Using Regular and High-Power Mode Polymerization Protocols According to USPHS and SQUACE Criteria: 10-Year Randomized Controlled Split-Mouth Trial.
Cerutti A; Barabanti N; Özcan M
J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(4):343-351. PubMed ID: 32666060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation.
Mena-Serrano A; Kose C; De Paula EA; Tay LY; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Perdigão J
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Feb; 25(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 23374411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resin composite class I restorations: a 54-month randomized clinical trial.
de Andrade AK; Duarte RM; Medeiros e Silva FD; Batista AU; Lima KC; Monteiro GQ; Montes MA
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(6):588-94. PubMed ID: 25084108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results.
Dresch W; Volpato S; Gomes JC; Ribeiro NR; Reis A; Loguercio AD
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 16924980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
