These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30779753)

  • 1. Training set optimization of genomic prediction by means of EthAcc.
    Mangin B; Rincent R; Rabier CE; Moreau L; Goudemand-Dugue E
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0205629. PubMed ID: 30779753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimization of genomic selection training populations with a genetic algorithm.
    Akdemir D; Sanchez JI; Jannink JL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 May; 47(1):38. PubMed ID: 25943105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Training set determination for genomic selection.
    Ou JH; Liao CT
    Theor Appl Genet; 2019 Oct; 132(10):2781-2792. PubMed ID: 31267147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forecasting the accuracy of genomic prediction with different selection targets in the training and prediction set as well as truncation selection.
    Schopp P; Riedelsheimer C; Utz HF; Schön CC; Melchinger AE
    Theor Appl Genet; 2015 Nov; 128(11):2189-201. PubMed ID: 26231985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Training set optimization under population structure in genomic selection.
    Isidro J; Jannink JL; Akdemir D; Poland J; Heslot N; Sorrells ME
    Theor Appl Genet; 2015 Jan; 128(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 25367380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic-enabled prediction with classification algorithms.
    Ornella L; Pérez P; Tapia E; González-Camacho JM; Burgueño J; Zhang X; Singh S; Vicente FS; Bonnett D; Dreisigacker S; Singh R; Long N; Crossa J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2014 Jun; 112(6):616-26. PubMed ID: 24424163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal Designs for Genomic Selection in Hybrid Crops.
    Guo T; Yu X; Li X; Zhang H; Zhu C; Flint-Garcia S; McMullen MD; Holland JB; Szalma SJ; Wisser RJ; Yu J
    Mol Plant; 2019 Mar; 12(3):390-401. PubMed ID: 30625380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic prediction and training set optimization in a structured Mediterranean oat population.
    Rio S; Gallego-Sánchez L; Montilla-Bascón G; Canales FJ; Isidro Y Sánchez J; Prats E
    Theor Appl Genet; 2021 Nov; 134(11):3595-3609. PubMed ID: 34341832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Economical optimization of a breeding scheme by selective phenotyping of the calibration set in a multi-trait context: application to bread making quality.
    Ben-Sadoun S; Rincent R; Auzanneau J; Oury FX; Rolland B; Heumez E; Ravel C; Charmet G; Bouchet S
    Theor Appl Genet; 2020 Jul; 133(7):2197-2212. PubMed ID: 32303775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic selection in sugar beet breeding populations.
    Würschum T; Reif JC; Kraft T; Janssen G; Zhao Y
    BMC Genet; 2013 Sep; 14():85. PubMed ID: 24047500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An alternative covariance estimator to investigate genetic heterogeneity in populations.
    Heslot N; Jannink JL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():93. PubMed ID: 26612537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample size determination for training set optimization in genomic prediction.
    Wu PY; Ou JH; Liao CT
    Theor Appl Genet; 2023 Mar; 136(3):57. PubMed ID: 36912999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of Genomic Prediction in Synthetic Populations Depending on the Number of Parents, Relatedness, and Ancestral Linkage Disequilibrium.
    Schopp P; Müller D; Technow F; Melchinger AE
    Genetics; 2017 Jan; 205(1):441-454. PubMed ID: 28049710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A fast genomic selection approach for large genomic data.
    Liu H; Chen GB
    Theor Appl Genet; 2017 Jun; 130(6):1277-1284. PubMed ID: 28389770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimization of training sets for genomic prediction of early-stage single crosses in maize.
    Kadam DC; Rodriguez OR; Lorenz AJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 2021 Feb; 134(2):687-699. PubMed ID: 33398385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Bayesian Genomic Multi-output Regressor Stacking Model for Predicting Multi-trait Multi-environment Plant Breeding Data.
    Montesinos-López OA; Montesinos-López A; Crossa J; Cuevas J; Montesinos-López JC; Gutiérrez ZS; Lillemo M; Philomin J; Singh R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Oct; 9(10):3381-3393. PubMed ID: 31427455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genomic selection efficiency and a priori estimation of accuracy in a structured dent maize panel.
    Rio S; Mary-Huard T; Moreau L; Charcosset A
    Theor Appl Genet; 2019 Jan; 132(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 30288553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting Hybrid Performances for Quality Traits through Genomic-Assisted Approaches in Central European Wheat.
    Liu G; Zhao Y; Gowda M; Longin CF; Reif JC; Mette MF
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158635. PubMed ID: 27383841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.