These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30781791)

  • 1. In Situ Modification of Reverse Osmosis Membrane Elements for Enhanced Removal of Multiple Micropollutants.
    Baransi-Karkaby K; Bass M; Freger V
    Membranes (Basel); 2019 Feb; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 30781791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward improved boron removal in RO by membrane modification: feasibility and challenges.
    Bernstein R; Belfer S; Freger V
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Apr; 45(8):3613-20. PubMed ID: 21417224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facile Modification of Reverse Osmosis Membranes by Surfactant-Assisted Acrylate Grafting for Enhanced Selectivity.
    Baransi-Karkaby K; Bass M; Levchenko S; Eitan S; Freger V
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 51(4):2347-2354. PubMed ID: 28124897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications.
    Xu P; Drewes JE; Bellona C; Amy G; Kim TU; Adam M; Heberer T
    Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15765934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An investigation of desalination by nanofiltration, reverse osmosis and integrated (hybrid NF/RO) membranes employed in brackish water treatment.
    Talaeipour M; Nouri J; Hassani AH; Mahvi AH
    J Environ Health Sci Eng; 2017; 15():18. PubMed ID: 28736617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Permeability of uncharged organic molecules in reverse osmosis desalination membranes.
    Dražević E; Košutić K; Svalina M; Catalano J
    Water Res; 2017 Jun; 116():13-22. PubMed ID: 28292676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Removal of emerging organic micropollutants via modified-reverse osmosis/nanofiltration membranes: A review.
    Khoo YS; Goh PS; Lau WJ; Ismail AF; Abdullah MS; Mohd Ghazali NH; Yahaya NKEM; Hashim N; Othman AR; Mohammed A; Kerisnan NDA; Mohamed Yusoff MA; Fazlin Hashim NH; Karim J; Abdullah NS
    Chemosphere; 2022 Oct; 305():135151. PubMed ID: 35654232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination and occurrence of organic micropollutants in reverse osmosis treatment for advanced water reuse.
    Gomez V; Majamaa K; Pocurull E; Borrull F
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 22678201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface modification of commercial reverse osmosis membranes using both hydrophilic polymer and graphene oxide to improve desalination efficiency.
    Majid H; Heidarzadeh N; Vatanpour V; Dehqan A
    Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 302():134931. PubMed ID: 35568212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
    Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling micropollutant removal by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: considerations and challenges.
    Castaño Osorio S; Biesheuvel PM; Spruijt E; Dykstra JE; van der Wal A
    Water Res; 2022 Oct; 225():119130. PubMed ID: 36240724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rejection of organic compounds by ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis membrane.
    Ozaki H; Li H
    Water Res; 2002 Jan; 36(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 11766787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review on the fate of organic micropollutants in wastewater treatment and water reuse with membranes.
    Siegrist H; Joss A
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 22828319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane.
    Valladares Linares R; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Li Z; Amy G
    Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(20):6737-44. PubMed ID: 22055122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Full-scale simulation of seawater reverse osmosis desalination processes for boron removal: Effect of membrane fouling.
    Park PK; Lee S; Cho JS; Kim JH
    Water Res; 2012 Aug; 46(12):3796-804. PubMed ID: 22578430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Removal of organic micro-pollutants (phenol, aniline and nitrobenzene) via forward osmosis (FO) process: Evaluation of FO as an alternative method to reverse osmosis (RO).
    Cui Y; Liu XY; Chung TS; Weber M; Staudt C; Maletzko C
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():104-14. PubMed ID: 26773492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis.
    Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2683-92. PubMed ID: 22402269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High performance RO membranes for desalination and wastewater reclamation and their operation results.
    Henmi M; Fusaoka Y; Tomioka H; Kurihara M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):2134-40. PubMed ID: 21045342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Boron Can Be Used to Predict Trace Organic Rejection through Reverse Osmosis Membranes for Potable Reuse.
    Breitner LN; Howe KJ; Minakata D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Dec; 52(23):13871-13878. PubMed ID: 30444356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Practical Considerations of Wastewater-Seawater Integrated Reverse Osmosis: Design Constraint by Boron Removal.
    Lee C; Kang Y; Kim DH; Kim IS
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 33800604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.