These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30781791)

  • 21. Reverse osmosis followed by activated carbon filtration for efficient removal of organic micropollutants from river bank filtrate.
    Kegel FS; Rietman BM; Verliefde AR
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(10):2603-10. PubMed ID: 20453334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development of antifouling reverse osmosis membranes for water treatment: A review.
    Kang GD; Cao YM
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(3):584-600. PubMed ID: 22154112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Removal of polar organic micropollutants by pilot-scale reverse osmosis drinking water treatment.
    Albergamo V; Blankert B; Cornelissen ER; Hofs B; Knibbe WJ; van der Meer W; de Voogt P
    Water Res; 2019 Jan; 148():535-545. PubMed ID: 30414537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Experiments and Modeling of Boric Acid Permeation through Double-Skinned Forward Osmosis Membranes.
    Luo L; Zhou Z; Chung TS; Weber M; Staudt C; Maletzko C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 50(14):7696-705. PubMed ID: 27280490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rejection of trace organic compounds by high-pressure membranes.
    Kim TU; Amy G; Drewes JE
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):335-44. PubMed ID: 16003994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Enhanced partitioning and transport of phenolic micropollutants within polyamide composite membranes.
    Drazevic E; Bason S; Kosutic K; Freger V
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(6):3377-83. PubMed ID: 22260225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Isotope and ion selectivity in reverse osmosis desalination: geochemical tracers for man-made freshwater.
    Kloppmann W; Vengosh A; Guerrot C; Millot R; Pankratov I
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jul; 42(13):4723-31. PubMed ID: 18677997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ozone and biofiltration as an alternative to reverse osmosis for removing PPCPs and micropollutants from treated wastewater.
    Lee CO; Howe KJ; Thomson BM
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(4):1005-14. PubMed ID: 22202904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Efficiently Combining Water Reuse and Desalination through Forward Osmosis-Reverse Osmosis (FO-RO) Hybrids: A Critical Review.
    Blandin G; Verliefde AR; Comas J; Rodriguez-Roda I; Le-Clech P
    Membranes (Basel); 2016 Jul; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 27376337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Integrating tunable anion exchange with reverse osmosis for enhanced recovery during inland brackish water desalination.
    Smith RC; SenGupta AK
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 May; 49(9):5637-44. PubMed ID: 25839209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A surrogate-based approach for trace organic chemical removal by a high-rejection reverse osmosis membrane.
    Fujioka T; Takeuchi H; Tanaka H; Kodamatani H
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Dec; 696():134002. PubMed ID: 31470318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. High rejection reverse osmosis membrane for removal of N-nitrosamines and their precursors.
    Fujioka T; Ishida KP; Shintani T; Kodamatani H
    Water Res; 2018 Mar; 131():45-51. PubMed ID: 29268083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inorganic fouling mitigation by salinity cycling in batch reverse osmosis.
    Warsinger DM; Tow EW; Maswadeh LA; Connors GB; Swaminathan J; Lienhard V JH
    Water Res; 2018 Jun; 137():384-394. PubMed ID: 29573825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Osmotic versus conventional membrane bioreactors integrated with reverse osmosis for water reuse: Biological stability, membrane fouling, and contaminant removal.
    Luo W; Phan HV; Xie M; Hai FI; Price WE; Elimelech M; Nghiem LD
    Water Res; 2017 Feb; 109():122-134. PubMed ID: 27883917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Numerical Simulations of Calcium Sulphate Scaling in Full-Scale Brackish Water Reverse Osmosis Pressure Vessels Using Computational Fluid Dynamics.
    Mao W; Zou X; Guo Z; Sun S; Ma S; Lyv S; Xiao Y; Ji X; Wang Y
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 34357171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Partitioning of Alkali Metal Salts and Boric Acid from Aqueous Phase into the Polyamide Active Layers of Reverse Osmosis Membranes.
    Wang J; Kingsbury RS; Perry LA; Coronell O
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 51(4):2295-2303. PubMed ID: 28084076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
    Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reverse osmosis membrane fabrication and modification technologies and future trends: A review.
    Hailemariam RH; Woo YC; Damtie MM; Kim BC; Park KD; Choi JS
    Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2020 Feb; 276():102100. PubMed ID: 31935555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Electroactive Membranes for Water Treatment: Enhanced Treatment Functionalities, Energy Considerations, and Future Challenges.
    Zhu X; Jassby D
    Acc Chem Res; 2019 May; 52(5):1177-1186. PubMed ID: 31032611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Path to Ultraselectivity: Support Layer Properties To Maximize Performance of Biomimetic Desalination Membranes.
    Werber JR; Porter CJ; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Sep; 52(18):10737-10747. PubMed ID: 30106285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.