These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30781791)

  • 41. Influence of residual organic macromolecules produced in biological wastewater treatment processes on removal of pharmaceuticals by NF/RO membranes.
    Kimura K; Iwase T; Kita S; Watanabe Y
    Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(15):3751-8. PubMed ID: 19564034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. UTEP-EPW university-utility partnership: Concentrate enhanced-recovery reverse osmosis process for high water recovery from silica-saturated desalination concentrates.
    Tarquin A; Walker WS; Delgado G; Bustamante A
    Water Environ Res; 2020 Mar; 92(3):369-377. PubMed ID: 31276246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Current Status and Future Trend of Dominant Commercial Reverse Osmosis Membranes.
    Kurihara M
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 Nov; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 34832135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges.
    Greenlee LF; Lawler DF; Freeman BD; Marrot B; Moulin P
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(9):2317-48. PubMed ID: 19371922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
    D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Super-fine powdered activated carbon (SPAC) for efficient removal of micropollutants from wastewater treatment plant effluent.
    Bonvin F; Jost L; Randin L; Bonvin E; Kohn T
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 90():90-99. PubMed ID: 26724443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Controlled TiO
    Zhou X; Zhao YY; Kim SR; Elimelech M; Hu S; Kim JH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Dec; 52(24):14311-14320. PubMed ID: 30516046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reverse osmosis membrane rejection for ersatz space mission wastewaters.
    Yoon Y; Lueptow RM
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3298-308. PubMed ID: 16005043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Removal of ciprofloxacin from seawater by reverse osmosis.
    Alonso JJS; El Kori N; Melián-Martel N; Del Río-Gamero B
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jul; 217():337-345. PubMed ID: 29621700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Water reuse: >90% water yield in MBR/RO through concentrate recycling and CO2 addition as scaling control.
    Joss A; Baenninger C; Foa P; Koepke S; Krauss M; McArdell CS; Rottermann K; Wei Y; Zapata A; Siegrist H
    Water Res; 2011 Nov; 45(18):6141-51. PubMed ID: 21959090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Energy efficiency of batch and semi-batch (CCRO) reverse osmosis desalination.
    Warsinger DM; Tow EW; Nayar KG; Maswadeh LA; Lienhard V JH
    Water Res; 2016 Dec; 106():272-282. PubMed ID: 27728821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Recycling of end-of-life reverse osmosis membranes for membrane biofilms reactors (MBfRs). Effect of chlorination on the membrane surface and gas permeability.
    Morón-López J; Nieto-Reyes L; Aguado S; El-Shehawy R; Molina S
    Chemosphere; 2019 Sep; 231():103-112. PubMed ID: 31128344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Strong improvement of nanofiltration performance on micropollutant removal and reduction of membrane fouling by hydrolyzed-aluminum nanoparticles.
    Wang P; Wang F; Jiang H; Zhang Y; Zhao M; Xiong R; Ma J
    Water Res; 2020 May; 175():115649. PubMed ID: 32200335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Minimal and zero liquid discharge with reverse osmosis using low-salt-rejection membranes.
    Wang Z; Deshmukh A; Du Y; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2020 Mar; 170():115317. PubMed ID: 31786394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Recent progress in the applications of layer-by-layer assembly to the preparation of nanostructured ion-rejecting water purification membranes.
    Sanyal O; Lee I
    J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2014 Mar; 14(3):2178-89. PubMed ID: 24745210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Hyperbranched poly(amidoamine)/TMC reverse osmosis membrane for oily saline water treatment.
    Pei B; Chen J; Liu P; He T; Li X; Zhang L
    Environ Technol; 2019 Sep; 40(21):2779-2788. PubMed ID: 29536785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Selective removal of arsenic and monovalent ions from brackish water reverse osmosis concentrate.
    Xu P; Capito M; Cath TY
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Sep; 260():885-91. PubMed ID: 23892312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Brackish water desalination using reverse osmosis and capacitive deionization at the water-energy nexus.
    Pan SY; Haddad AZ; Kumar A; Wang SW
    Water Res; 2020 Sep; 183():116064. PubMed ID: 32745671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effective salt removal from domestic reverse osmosis reject water in a microbial desalination cell.
    Dongre A; Poddar NK; Sharma RK; Sogani M
    3 Biotech; 2022 Aug; 12(8):172. PubMed ID: 35845113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Rotating reverse osmosis: a dynamic model for flux and rejection.
    Lee S; Lueptow RM
    J Memb Sci; 2001 Oct; 192(2):129-43. PubMed ID: 11757575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.