398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30782461)
21. Influence of the abutment height and connection timing in early peri-implant marginal bone changes: A prospective randomized clinical trial.
Borges T; Leitão B; Pereira M; Carvalho Á; Galindo-Moreno P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):907-914. PubMed ID: 30259582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bone and soft tissue outcomes, risk factors, and complications of implant-supported prostheses: 5-Years RCT with different abutment types and loading protocols.
Göthberg C; Gröndahl K; Omar O; Thomsen P; Slotte C
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):313-321. PubMed ID: 29380510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Marginal Bone Loss Around Short Dental Implants Restored at Implant Level and with Transmucosal Abutment: A Retrospective Study.
Hernández-Marcos G; Hernández-Herrera M; Anitua E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1362-1367. PubMed ID: 30427968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Platform-Switching to Preserve Peri-Implant Bone: A Meta-Analysis.
Aslam A; Ahmed B
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 Apr; 26(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 27097705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap.
Norton MR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):777-84. PubMed ID: 17066640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Abutment height influences the effect of platform switching on peri-implant marginal bone loss.
Galindo-Moreno P; León-Cano A; Monje A; Ortega-Oller I; O'Valle F; Catena A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Feb; 27(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 25678247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study.
Hürzeler M; Fickl S; Zuhr O; Wachtel HC
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 65(7 Suppl 1):33-9. PubMed ID: 17586347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of abutment connections and plaque control on the initial healing of prematurely exposed implants: an experimental study in dogs.
Jeong SM; Choi BH; Li J; Kim HS; Ko CY; Lee SH
J Periodontol; 2008 Jun; 79(6):1070-4. PubMed ID: 18533785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Should the restoration of adjacent implants be splinted or nonsplinted? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Lemos CAA; Cruz RS; Oliveira HFF; Gomes JML; Pellizzer EP
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 29961632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The prosthetic abutment height can affect marginal bone loss around dental implants.
Lee BA; Kim BH; Kweon HHI; Kim YT
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 20(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 30048041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of implant neck design and implant-abutment connection type on peri-implant health. Radiological study.
Peñarrocha-Diago MA; Flichy-Fernández AJ; Alonso-González R; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Balaguer-Martínez J; Peñarrocha-Diago M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1192-200. PubMed ID: 22925048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of healing abutment reconnection and disconnection on soft and hard peri-implant tissues: a short-term randomized controlled clinical trial.
Koutouzis T; Koutouzis G; Gadalla H; Neiva R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(3):807-14. PubMed ID: 23748313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effect of implant-abutment junction position on crestal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Saleh MHA; Ravidà A; Suárez-López Del Amo F; Lin GH; Asa'ad F; Wang HL
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):617-633. PubMed ID: 29575584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical evaluation of marginal bone loss and stability in two types of submerged dental implants.
Gultekin BA; Gultekin P; Leblebicioglu B; Basegmez C; Yalcin S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(3):815-23. PubMed ID: 23748314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants with Implant-Abutment Connections at Epicrestal Level or Above: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
van Eekeren PJ; Tahmaseb A; Wismeijer D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 26800168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Retrospective evaluation of crestal bone changes around implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions: the effect of bone grafting at implant placement.
Koutouzis T; Fetner M; Fetner A; Lundgren T
J Periodontol; 2011 Feb; 82(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 20731584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Time dependent failure rate and marginal bone loss of implant supported prostheses: a 15-year follow-up study.
Snauwaert K; Duyck J; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M; Naert I
Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Mar; 4(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 11218510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Effect of Interimplant Distance on Peri-implant Bone and Soft Tissue Dimensional Changes: A Nonrandomized, Prospective, 2-Year Follow-up Study.
Koutouzis T; Neiva R; Lipton D; Lundgren T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(4):900-8. PubMed ID: 26252042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A randomized controlled clinical trial to assess crestal bone remodeling of four different implant designs.
Glibert M; Vervaeke S; Jacquet W; Vermeersch K; Östman PO; De Bruyn H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):455-462. PubMed ID: 29575488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
