These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30782511)

  • 41. Automated three-dimensional quantification of noncalcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography: comparison with intravascular US.
    Dey D; Schepis T; Marwan M; Slomka PJ; Berman DS; Achenbach S
    Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):516-22. PubMed ID: 20829536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Towards reference values of pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation: impact of coronary artery and tube voltage in coronary computed tomography angiography.
    Ma R; Ties D; van Assen M; Pelgrim GJ; Sidorenkov G; van Ooijen PMA; van der Harst P; van Dijk R; Vliegenthart R
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Dec; 30(12):6838-6846. PubMed ID: 32700017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT angiography and coronary risk stratification.
    Yang X; Gai LY; Li P; Chen YD; Li T; Yang L
    Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2010 Oct; 6():935-41. PubMed ID: 21057578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Head-to-head comparison of coronary plaque evaluation between multislice computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis.
    Pundziute G; Schuijf JD; Jukema JW; Decramer I; Sarno G; Vanhoenacker PK; Reiber JH; Schalij MJ; Wijns W; Bax JJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Apr; 1(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 19463297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Optimal boundary detection method and window settings for coronary atherosclerotic plaque volume analysis in coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Heo R; Park HB; Lee BK; Shin S; Arsanjani R; Min JK; Chang HJ
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3190-8. PubMed ID: 26630996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Influence of contrast material density and kV setting on detectability of calcified plaques on coronary CT angiography.
    Tischendorf P; Arendt CT; Scholtz JE; Leithner D; Vogl TJ; Bauer RW; Frellesen C
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 132():109276. PubMed ID: 32998080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Coronary Artery Calcium Progression Is Associated With Coronary Plaque Volume Progression: Results From a Quantitative Semiautomated Coronary Artery Plaque Analysis.
    Ceponiene I; Nakanishi R; Osawa K; Kanisawa M; Nezarat N; Rahmani S; Kissel K; Kim M; Jayawardena E; Broersen A; Kitslaar P; Budoff MJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 11(12):1785-1794. PubMed ID: 29055625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Characterization of atherosclerotic plaques in human coronary arteries with 16-slice multidetector row computed tomography by analysis of attenuation profiles.
    Galonska M; Ducke F; Kertesz-Zborilova T; Meyer R; Guski H; Knollmann FD
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):222-30. PubMed ID: 18206621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Characterisation of non-calcified coronary plaque by 16-slice multidetector computed tomography: comparison with histopathological specimens obtained by directional coronary atherectomy.
    Kimura S; Yonetsu T; Suzuki K; Isobe M; Iesaka Y; Kakuta T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Oct; 28(7):1749-62. PubMed ID: 22147106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Serum marker and CT characteristics of coronary calcified nodule assessed by intravascular ultrasound.
    Li J; Li J; Jian Z; Wu J; Yang J; Guo N; Huang X
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 Nov; 22(1):475. PubMed ID: 36348294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography vs intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of vessel area.
    Kruk M; Wardziak Ł; Mintz GS; Achenbach S; Pręgowski J; Rużyłło W; Dzielińska Z; Demkow M; Witkowski A; Kępka C
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 24661827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. In vivo evaluation of fibrous cap thickness by optical coherence tomography for positive remodeling and low-attenuation plaques assessed by computed tomography angiography.
    Sato A; Hoshi T; Kakefuda Y; Hiraya D; Watabe H; Kawabe M; Akiyama D; Koike A; Aonuma K
    Int J Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 182():419-25. PubMed ID: 25596470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The effect of heart rate on coronary plaque measurements in 320-row coronary CT angiography.
    Kidoh M; Utsunomiya D; Funama Y; Sakabe D; Oda S; Nakaura T; Yuki H; Nagayama Y; Hirata K; Iyama Y; Namimoto T; Yamashita Y
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 34(12):1977-1985. PubMed ID: 30030671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The role of computed tomography angiography in assessing the correlation between properties of coronary atherosclerotic plaque and blood lipids.
    Wang Z; Xu L; Sun L; Jiang X; Wang J
    Technol Health Care; 2024; 32(4):2265-2275. PubMed ID: 38393936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Endothelial shear stress computed from coronary computed tomography angiography: A direct comparison to intravascular ultrasound.
    Hakim D; Coskun AU; Maynard C; Pu Z; Rupert D; Cefalo N; Cormier M; Ahmed M; Earls J; Jennings R; Croce K; Mushtaq S; Andreini D; Conte E; Molony D; Samady H; Min JK; Stone PH
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2023; 17(3):201-210. PubMed ID: 37076326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque visualization on CT: effects of contrast-enhancement and lipid-content fractions.
    Kristanto W; van Ooijen PM; Greuter MJ; Groen JM; Vliegenthart R; Oudkerk M
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jun; 29(5):1137-48. PubMed ID: 23324971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Characterization of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by multi-detector row CT: comparison to IVUS.
    Pohle K; Achenbach S; Macneill B; Ropers D; Ferencik M; Moselewski F; Hoffmann U; Brady TJ; Jang IK; Daniel WG
    Atherosclerosis; 2007 Jan; 190(1):174-80. PubMed ID: 16494883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Predictive performance of dual modality of computed tomography angiography and intravascular ultrasound for no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary stenting in stable coronary artery disease.
    Okutsu M; Horio T; Tanaka H; Akiyama M; Okimoto N; Tsubouchi T; Kawajiri K; Ohashi Y; Sumitsuji S; Ikari Y
    Heart Vessels; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1121-1128. PubMed ID: 29644449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Enhanced characterization of calcified areas in intravascular ultrasound virtual histology images by quantification of the acoustic shadow: validation against computed tomography coronary angiography.
    Broersen A; de Graaf MA; Eggermont J; Wolterbeek R; Kitslaar PH; Dijkstra J; Bax JJ; Reiber JH; Scholte AJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Apr; 32(4):543-52. PubMed ID: 26667446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Coronary plaque volume and predictors for fast plaque progression assessed by serial coronary CT angiography-A single-center observational study.
    Weber C; Deseive S; Brim G; Stocker TJ; Broersen A; Kitslaar P; Martinoff S; Massberg S; Hadamitzky M; Hausleiter J
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Feb; 123():108805. PubMed ID: 31896023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.