These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30783793)
1. The use of smartphones in radiographic diagnosis: accuracy on the detection of marginal gaps. Giacomini GO; Antonioli C; Tibúrcio-Machado CS; Fontana MP; Liedke GS Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1993-1996. PubMed ID: 30783793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Smartphone use as an aid in evaluating conventional radiographs. Giacomini GO; Antonioli C; Tibúrcio-Machado CS; Fontana MP; Liedke GS Gen Dent; 2021; 69(5):43-45. PubMed ID: 34424211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital radiography for detecting misfit between the tooth and restoration in metal-restored teeth. Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; Vizzotto MB; Da Silveira PF; Silveira HE; Wenzel A J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25311793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of file compression on radiographic diagnosis of periodontal bone loss on smartphones. Savegnago GD; Jacques YJ; Ortigara GB; Vizzotto MB; Liedke GS Am J Dent; 2024 Oct; 37(5):244-246. PubMed ID: 39321104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intra- and inter-examiner agreement when assessing radiographic implant bone levels: Differences related to brightness, accuracy, participant demographics and implant characteristics. Walton TR; Layton DM Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jul; 29(7):756-771. PubMed ID: 30240063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques. Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of smartphone captured radiologic images communicated via WhatsApp®. Ntja U; Janse van Rensburg J; Joubert G Afr J Emerg Med; 2022 Mar; 12(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 35070657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Smartphone Use for Tomographic Evaluation: Application in Endodontic Diagnosis. Schallenberger V; Maracci LM; Malta CP; Serpa GF; Liedke GS J Endod; 2022 May; 48(5):614-619. PubMed ID: 35121003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography sections with various thicknesses for detecting misfit between the tooth and restoration in metal-restored teeth. Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; Vizzotto MB; da Silveira PF; Wenzel A; da Silveira HE Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Aug; 120(2):e131-7. PubMed ID: 26166035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is it feasible to use smartphone images to perform telediagnosis of different stages of occlusal caries lesions? Kohara EK; Abdala CG; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Haddad AE; Mendes FM PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0202116. PubMed ID: 30188900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Micro-CT Evaluation of Ceramic Inlays: Comparison of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Five and Three Axis CAM Systems with a Heat Press Technique. Alajaji NK; Bardwell D; Finkelman M; Ali A J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Feb; 29(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 27680508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods. Attrill DC; Ashley PF Br Dent J; 2001 Apr; 190(8):440-3. PubMed ID: 11352392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment. Sturdevant JR; Bayne SC; Heymann HO J Esthet Dent; 1999; 11(4):206-14. PubMed ID: 10825877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal adaptation of a sintered ceramic inlay system before and after cementation. Gemalmaz D; Ozcan M; Yoruç AB; Alkumru HN J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Sep; 24(9):646-51. PubMed ID: 9357744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and reproducibility of conventional radiographic assessment and subtraction radiography in detecting demineralization in occlusal surfaces. Ricketts DN; Ekstrand KR; Martignon S; Ellwood R; Alatsaris M; Nugent Z Caries Res; 2007; 41(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 17284913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies. Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):530-536. PubMed ID: 30318049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of marginal fit of class II ceromer inlays. Gemalmaz D; Kükrer D J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jun; 33(6):436-42. PubMed ID: 16671990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography. Borg E Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of pulmonary edema in pigs: storage phosphor versus amorphous selenium-based flat-panel-detector radiography. Kim TS; Im JG; Goo JM; Lee KH; Lee YJ; Kim SH; Kim S Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 12034937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal and internal fit of four different types of ceramic inlays after luting. An in vitro study. Sjögren G Acta Odontol Scand; 1995 Feb; 53(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 7740927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]