247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30783896)
1. Assessing the practical differences between model selection methods in inferences about choice response time tasks.
Evans NJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1070-1098. PubMed ID: 30783896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: different models for response time with different conclusions about psychological mechanisms?
Heathcote A; Hayes B
Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Jun; 66(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 22686161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).
Vrieze SI
Psychol Methods; 2012 Jun; 17(2):228-43. PubMed ID: 22309957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayes factors for the linear ballistic accumulator model of decision-making.
Evans NJ; Brown SD
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):589-603. PubMed ID: 28455795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic models of choice.
Heathcote A; Lin YS; Reynolds A; Strickland L; Gretton M; Matzke D
Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):961-985. PubMed ID: 29959755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of Akaike Information Criterion and Bayesian Information Criterion in Selecting Partition Models and Mixture Models.
Liu Q; Charleston MA; Richards SA; Holland BR
Syst Biol; 2023 May; 72(1):92-105. PubMed ID: 36575813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian statistical approaches to evaluating cognitive models.
Annis J; Palmeri TJ
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2018 Mar; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 29193776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. AIC model selection using Akaike weights.
Wagenmakers EJ; Farrell S
Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Feb; 11(1):192-6. PubMed ID: 15117008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Think fast! The implications of emphasizing urgency in decision-making.
Evans NJ
Cognition; 2021 Sep; 214():104704. PubMed ID: 33975126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian outcome-based strategy classification.
Lee MD
Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 25697091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation.
Brown SD; Heathcote A
Cogn Psychol; 2008 Nov; 57(3):153-78. PubMed ID: 18243170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian model selection techniques as decision support for shaping a statistical analysis plan of a clinical trial: an example from a vertigo phase III study with longitudinal count data as primary endpoint.
Adrion C; Mansmann U
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Sep; 12():137. PubMed ID: 22962944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing DIC and WAIC for multilevel models with missing data.
Du H; Keller B; Alacam E; Enders C
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):2731-2750. PubMed ID: 37864117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parameter recovery, bias and standard errors in the linear ballistic accumulator model.
Visser I; Poessé R
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):280-296. PubMed ID: 28474771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intertemporal choice as discounted value accumulation.
Rodriguez CA; Turner BM; McClure SM
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e90138. PubMed ID: 24587243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis?
Ripplinger J; Sullivan J
Syst Biol; 2008 Feb; 57(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 18275003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modeling adaptive response profiles in a vaccine clinical trial.
Hasdemir D; van den Berg RA; van Kampen A; Smilde AK
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):191. PubMed ID: 32677968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayesian model selection for spatial capture-recapture models.
Dey S; Delampady M; Gopalaswamy AM
Ecol Evol; 2019 Oct; 9(20):11569-11583. PubMed ID: 31695869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Getting more from accuracy and response time data: methods for fitting the linear ballistic accumulator.
Donkin C; Averell L; Brown S; Heathcote A
Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1095-110. PubMed ID: 19897817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Model selection in occupancy models: Inference versus prediction.
Stewart PS; Stephens PA; Hill RA; Whittingham MJ; Dawson W
Ecology; 2023 Mar; 104(3):e3942. PubMed ID: 36477749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
