248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30783896)
21. Individual influence on model selection.
Sterba SK; Pek J
Psychol Methods; 2012 Dec; 17(4):582-99. PubMed ID: 22845875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. On the importance of avoiding shortcuts in applying cognitive models to hierarchical data.
Boehm U; Marsman M; Matzke D; Wagenmakers EJ
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1614-1631. PubMed ID: 29949071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of model selection for regression.
Cherkassky V; Ma Y
Neural Comput; 2003 Jul; 15(7):1691-714. PubMed ID: 12816572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Asymptotics of AIC, BIC, and RMSEA for Model Selection in Structural Equation Modeling.
Huang PH
Psychometrika; 2017 Jun; 82(2):407-426. PubMed ID: 28447310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. PyBEAM: A Bayesian approach to parameter inference for a wide class of binary evidence accumulation models.
Murrow M; Holmes WR
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2636-2656. PubMed ID: 37550470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Survival analysis for white non-Hispanic female breast cancer patients.
Khan HM; Saxena A; Gabbidon K; Stewart TS; Bhatt C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(9):4049-54. PubMed ID: 24935595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An empirical comparison of information-theoretic selection criteria for multivariate behavior genetic models.
Markon KE; Krueger RF
Behav Genet; 2004 Nov; 34(6):593-610. PubMed ID: 15520516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Double responding: A new constraint for models of speeded decision making.
Evans NJ; Dutilh G; Wagenmakers EJ; van der Maas HLJ
Cogn Psychol; 2020 Sep; 121():101292. PubMed ID: 32217348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Decision processes and the slowing of simple choices in schizophrenia.
Heathcote A; Suraev A; Curley S; Gong Q; Love J; Michie PT
J Abnorm Psychol; 2015 Nov; 124(4):961-974. PubMed ID: 26595475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Joint modeling of reaction times and choice improves parameter identifiability in reinforcement learning models.
Ballard IC; McClure SM
J Neurosci Methods; 2019 Apr; 317():37-44. PubMed ID: 30664916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Quality of Response Time Data Inference: A Blinded, Collaborative Assessment of the Validity of Cognitive Models.
Dutilh G; Annis J; Brown SD; Cassey P; Evans NJ; Grasman RPPP; Hawkins GE; Heathcote A; Holmes WR; Krypotos AM; Kupitz CN; Leite FP; Lerche V; Lin YS; Logan GD; Palmeri TJ; Starns JJ; Trueblood JS; van Maanen L; van Ravenzwaaij D; Vandekerckhove J; Visser I; Voss A; White CN; Wiecki TV; Rieskamp J; Donkin C
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1051-1069. PubMed ID: 29450793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. CHull as an alternative to AIC and BIC in the context of mixtures of factor analyzers.
Bulteel K; Wilderjans TF; Tuerlinckx F; Ceulemans E
Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):782-91. PubMed ID: 23307573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bayesian inference with Stan: A tutorial on adding custom distributions.
Annis J; Miller BJ; Palmeri TJ
Behav Res Methods; 2017 Jun; 49(3):863-886. PubMed ID: 27287444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bayesian models of cognition revisited: Setting optimality aside and letting data drive psychological theory.
Tauber S; Navarro DJ; Perfors A; Steyvers M
Psychol Rev; 2017 Jul; 124(4):410-441. PubMed ID: 28358549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A new framework for modeling decisions about changing information: The Piecewise Linear Ballistic Accumulator model.
Holmes WR; Trueblood JS; Heathcote A
Cogn Psychol; 2016 Mar; 85():1-29. PubMed ID: 26760448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessing Local Model Adequacy in Bayesian Hierarchical Models Using the Partitioned Deviance Information Criterion.
Wheeler DC; Hickson DA; Waller LA
Comput Stat Data Anal; 2010 Jun; 54(6):1657-1671. PubMed ID: 21243121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. On the Use of Information Criteria for Model Selection in Phylogenetics.
Susko E; Roger AJ
Mol Biol Evol; 2020 Feb; 37(2):549-562. PubMed ID: 31688943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance of growth mixture models in the presence of time-varying covariates.
Diallo TMO; Morin AJS; Lu H
Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1951-1965. PubMed ID: 27800579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Does the choice of nucleotide substitution models matter topologically?
Hoff M; Orf S; Riehm B; Darriba D; Stamatakis A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 17():143. PubMed ID: 27009141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bayesian latent variable models for the analysis of experimental psychology data.
Merkle EC; Wang T
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Feb; 25(1):256-270. PubMed ID: 26993323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
