These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30784132)

  • 1. Propensity score methods and regression adjustment for analysis of nonrandomized studies with health-related quality of life outcomes.
    Cottone F; Anota A; Bonnetain F; Collins GS; Efficace F
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 May; 28(5):690-699. PubMed ID: 30784132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of inverse probability weighting using the propensity score for baseline covariate adjustment in smaller population randomised controlled trials with a continuous outcome.
    Raad H; Cornelius V; Chan S; Williamson E; Cro S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):70. PubMed ID: 32293286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios in case of small sample size.
    Pirracchio R; Resche-Rigon M; Chevret S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 May; 12():70. PubMed ID: 22646911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the use of propensity scores in case of rare exposure.
    Hajage D; Tubach F; Steg PG; Bhatt DL; De Rycke Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():38. PubMed ID: 27036963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2837-49. PubMed ID: 23239115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating differences in proportions (risk differences or absolute risk reductions) in observational studies.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2137-48. PubMed ID: 20108233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Propensity score trimming mitigates bias due to covariate measurement error in inverse probability of treatment weighted analyses: A plasmode simulation.
    Conover MM; Rothman KJ; Stürmer T; Ellis AR; Poole C; Jonsson Funk M
    Stat Med; 2021 Apr; 40(9):2101-2112. PubMed ID: 33622016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variable selection for propensity score models when estimating treatment effects on multiple outcomes: a simulation study.
    Wyss R; Girman CJ; LoCasale RJ; Brookhart AM; Stürmer T
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2013 Jan; 22(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 23070806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Propensity score balance measures in pharmacoepidemiology: a simulation study.
    Ali MS; Groenwold RH; Pestman WR; Belitser SV; Roes KC; Hoes AW; de Boer A; Klungel OH
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2014 Aug; 23(8):802-11. PubMed ID: 24478163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bootstrap vs asymptotic variance estimation when using propensity score weighting with continuous and binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2022 Sep; 41(22):4426-4443. PubMed ID: 35841200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On variance estimation of the inverse probability-of-treatment weighting estimator: A tutorial for different types of propensity score weights.
    Kostouraki A; Hajage D; Rachet B; Williamson EJ; Chauvet G; Belot A; Leyrat C
    Stat Med; 2024 Jun; 43(13):2672-2694. PubMed ID: 38622063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methods for estimating subgroup effects in cost-effectiveness analyses that use observational data.
    Kreif N; Grieve R; Radice R; Sadique Z; Ramsahai R; Sekhon JS
    Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(6):750-63. PubMed ID: 22691446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Propensity score-integrated Bayesian prior approaches for augmented control designs: a simulation study.
    Wang X; Suttner L; Jemielita T; Li X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2022 Jan; 32(1):170-190. PubMed ID: 34939894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Propensity scores used for analysis of cluster randomized trials with selection bias: a simulation study.
    Leyrat C; Caille A; Donner A; Giraudeau B
    Stat Med; 2013 Aug; 32(19):3357-72. PubMed ID: 23553813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Evaluation of Weighting Methods Based on Propensity Scores to Reduce Selection Bias in Multilevel Observational Studies.
    Leite WL; Jimenez F; Kaya Y; Stapleton LM; MacInnes JW; Sandbach R
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(3):265-84. PubMed ID: 26610029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance evaluation of regression splines for propensity score adjustment in post-market safety analysis with multiple treatments.
    Tian Y; Baro E; Zhang R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(5):810-821. PubMed ID: 31502924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in target estimands between different propensity score-based weights.
    Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2023 Oct; 32(10):1103-1112. PubMed ID: 37208837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.