These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30784432)

  • 1. Bias of Inaccurate Disease Mentions in Electronic Health Record-based Phenotyping.
    Kagawa R; Shinohara E; Imai T; Kawazoe Y; Ohe K
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Apr; 124():90-96. PubMed ID: 30784432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterizing Physicians Practice Phenotype from Unstructured Electronic Health Records.
    Dey S; Wang Y; Byrd RJ; Ng K; Steinhubl SR; deFilippi C; Stewart WF
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2016; 2016():514-523. PubMed ID: 28269847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electronic health record phenotyping improves detection and screening of type 2 diabetes in the general United States population: A cross-sectional, unselected, retrospective study.
    Anderson AE; Kerr WT; Thames A; Li T; Xiao J; Cohen MS
    J Biomed Inform; 2016 Apr; 60():162-8. PubMed ID: 26707455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ComprehENotes, an Instrument to Assess Patient Reading Comprehension of Electronic Health Record Notes: Development and Validation.
    Lalor JP; Wu H; Chen L; Mazor KM; Yu H
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Apr; 20(4):e139. PubMed ID: 29695372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated problem list generation and physicians perspective from a pilot study.
    Devarakonda MV; Mehta N; Tsou CH; Liang JJ; Nowacki AS; Jelovsek JE
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Sep; 105():121-129. PubMed ID: 28750905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative observational study of inpatient clinical note-entry and reading/retrieval styles adopted by physicians.
    Rizvi RF; Harder KA; Hultman GM; Adam TJ; Kim M; Pakhomov SV; Melton GB
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Jun; 90():1-11. PubMed ID: 27103191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Next-generation phenotyping of electronic health records.
    Hripcsak G; Albers DJ
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2013 Jan; 20(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 22955496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discovering and identifying New York heart association classification from electronic health records.
    Zhang R; Ma S; Shanahan L; Munroe J; Horn S; Speedie S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2018 Jul; 18(Suppl 2):48. PubMed ID: 30066653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Hybrid Approach to Extracting Disorder Mentions from Clinical Notes.
    Wang C; Akella R
    AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc; 2015; 2015():183-7. PubMed ID: 26306265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using voice to create hospital progress notes: Description of a mobile application and supporting system integrated with a commercial electronic health record.
    Payne TH; Alonso WD; Markiel JA; Lybarger K; White AA
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Jan; 77():91-96. PubMed ID: 29233669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Satisfaction and perceived usefulness with newly-implemented Electronic Health Records System among pediatricians at a university hospital.
    Alsohime F; Temsah MH; Al-Eyadhy A; Bashiri FA; Househ M; Jamal A; Hasan G; Alhaboob AA; Alabdulhafid M; Amer YS
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Feb; 169():51-57. PubMed ID: 30638591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early recognition of multiple sclerosis using natural language processing of the electronic health record.
    Chase HS; Mitrani LR; Lu GG; Fulgieri DJ
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Feb; 17(1):24. PubMed ID: 28241760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A two-stage workflow to extract and harmonize drug mentions from clinical notes into observational databases.
    Almeida JR; Silva JF; Matos S; Oliveira JL
    J Biomed Inform; 2021 Aug; 120():103849. PubMed ID: 34214696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.
    Kaipio J; Lääveri T; Hyppönen H; Vainiomäki S; Reponen J; Kushniruk A; Borycki E; Vänskä J
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():266-281. PubMed ID: 27919385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electronic health record usage behaviors in primary care medical practices: A survey of family physicians in Canada.
    Paré G; Raymond L; Guinea AO; Poba-Nzaou P; Trudel MC; Marsan J; Micheneau T
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Oct; 84(10):857-67. PubMed ID: 26238705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using natural language processing to identify problem usage of prescription opioids.
    Carrell DS; Cronkite D; Palmer RE; Saunders K; Gross DE; Masters ET; Hylan TR; Von Korff M
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Dec; 84(12):1057-64. PubMed ID: 26456569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The EHR and building the patient's story: A qualitative investigation of how EHR use obstructs a vital clinical activity.
    Varpio L; Rashotte J; Day K; King J; Kuziemsky C; Parush A
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Dec; 84(12):1019-28. PubMed ID: 26432683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enabling phenotypic big data with PheNorm.
    Yu S; Ma Y; Gronsbell J; Cai T; Ananthakrishnan AN; Gainer VS; Churchill SE; Szolovits P; Murphy SN; Kohane IS; Liao KP; Cai T
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Jan; 25(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 29126253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of the HITECH financial incentives on EHR adoption in small, physician-owned practices.
    Cohen MF
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Oct; 94():143-54. PubMed ID: 27573322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electronic health records and the frequency of diagnostic test orders.
    Hakim I; Hathi S; Nair A; Narula T; Bhattacharya J
    Am J Manag Care; 2017 Jan; 23(1):e16-e23. PubMed ID: 28141935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.