301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30785616)
1. Evaluation of Access to Hospitals Most Ready to Achieve National Accreditation for Rectal Cancer Treatment.
Antunez AG; Kanters AE; Regenbogen SE
JAMA Surg; 2019 Jun; 154(6):516-523. PubMed ID: 30785616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the Current Status of Rectal Cancer Care in the US: Where We Stand at the Start of the Commission on Cancer's National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer.
Brady JT; Xu Z; Scarberry KB; Saad A; Fleming FJ; Remzi FH; Wexner SD; Winchester DP; Monson JRT; Lee L; Dietz DW;
J Am Coll Surg; 2018 May; 226(5):881-890. PubMed ID: 29580675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Could meeting the standards of the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer in the National Cancer Database improve patient outcomes?
Brady JT; Bingmer K; Bliggenstorfer J; Xu Z; Fleming FJ; Remzi FH; Monson JRT; Wexner SD; Dietz DW;
Colorectal Dis; 2023 May; 25(5):916-922. PubMed ID: 36727838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer guidelines on surgical margin status.
Arndt KR; Dombek GE; Allar BG; Storino A; Fleishman A; Quinn J; Fabrizio A; Cataldo TE; Messaris E
Surg Oncol; 2023 Dec; 51():101921. PubMed ID: 36898906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A NSQIP analysis of trends in surgical outcomes for rectal cancer: What can we improve upon?
Sharp SP; Malizia R; Skancke M; Arsoniadis EG; Ata A; Stain SC; Valerian BT; Lee EC; Wexner SD
Am J Surg; 2020 Aug; 220(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31964524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of the cancer center when using lymph node count as a quality measure for gastric cancer surgery.
Morgan JW; Ji L; Friedman G; Senthil M; Dyke C; Lum SS
JAMA Surg; 2015 Jan; 150(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 25426671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Update on The National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer (NAPRC): the radiologist's role.
Korngold EK; Gollub MJ; Kim DH; Moreno CC; de Prisco G; Harisinghani M; Khatri G
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Sep; 48(9):2814-2824. PubMed ID: 37160474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of Discretionary Hospital Volume Standards for High-risk Cancer Surgery With Patient Outcomes and Access, 2005-2016.
Sheetz KH; Chhabra KR; Smith ME; Dimick JB; Nathan H
JAMA Surg; 2019 Nov; 154(11):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 31411663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Rationale for and Reality of the New National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer.
Wexner SD; Berho ME
Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Jun; 60(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 28481853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experience of a single academic institution with the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer and the resulting improvement in care.
Johns AJ; Yoon PS; Sabo AJ; Huynh TT; Farmer DL; Navarro SM; Farkas LM
Colorectal Dis; 2023 Nov; 25(11):2155-2159. PubMed ID: 37789561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cancer Center Volume and Type Impact Stage-Specific Utilization of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer.
Midura EF; Jung AD; Daly MC; Hanseman DJ; Davis BR; Shah SA; Paquette IM
Dig Dis Sci; 2017 Aug; 62(8):1906-1912. PubMed ID: 28501970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High volume improves outcomes: The argument for centralization of rectal cancer surgery.
Aquina CT; Probst CP; Becerra AZ; Iannuzzi JC; Kelly KN; Hensley BJ; Rickles AS; Noyes K; Fleming FJ; Monson JR
Surgery; 2016 Mar; 159(3):736-48. PubMed ID: 26576696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fragmented Care in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer and Time to Definitive Therapy.
Abelson JS; Bauer PS; Barron J; Bommireddy A; Chapman WC; Schad C; Ohman K; Hunt S; Mutch M; Silviera M
J Am Coll Surg; 2021 Jan; 232(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 33190785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].
Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data.
Amato L; Fusco D; Acampora A; Bontempi K; Rosa AC; Colais P; Cruciani F; D'Ovidio M; Mataloni F; Minozzi S; Mitrova Z; Pinnarelli L; Saulle R; Soldati S; Sorge C; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Davoli M
Epidemiol Prev; 2017; 41(5-6 (Suppl 2)):1-128. PubMed ID: 29205995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of Patterns of Compliance with Accreditation Standards of National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer.
Raman S; Tsoraides SS; Sylla P; Sarin A; Farkas L; DeKoster E; Hull T; Wexner S
J Am Coll Surg; 2022 Mar; 234(3):368-376. PubMed ID: 35213501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel risk-adjusted nomogram for rectal cancer surgery outcomes.
Russell MC; You YN; Hu CY; Cormier JN; Feig BW; Skibber JM; Rodriguez-Bigas MA; Nelson H; Chang GJ
JAMA Surg; 2013 Aug; 148(8):769-77. PubMed ID: 23803722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program and the Accreditation of Cancer Program: A Cross-sectional Study.
Spaulding A; Paul R; Colibaseanu D
Inquiry; 2018; 55():46958018770294. PubMed ID: 29806532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Guideline-Recommended Chemoradiation for Patients With Rectal Cancer at Large Hospitals: A Trend in the Right Direction.
Del Vecchio NJ; Schlichting JA; Chioreso C; Kahl AR; Hrabe JE; Lynch CF; West MM; Charlton ME
Dis Colon Rectum; 2019 Oct; 62(10):1186-1194. PubMed ID: 31490827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using a Lymph Node Count Metric to Identify Underperforming Hospitals After Rectal Cancer Surgery.
Raoof M; Zafar SN; Ituarte PHG; Krouse RS; Melstrom K
J Surg Res; 2019 Apr; 236():216-223. PubMed ID: 30694758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
