These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30786248)

  • 1. Reconstruction of effective connectivity in the case of asymmetric phase distributions.
    Yeldesbay A; Fink GR; Daun S
    J Neurosci Methods; 2019 Apr; 317():94-107. PubMed ID: 30786248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Large-scale neural models and dynamic causal modelling.
    Lee L; Friston K; Horwitz B
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 30(4):1243-54. PubMed ID: 16387513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A dynamical systems approach for estimating phase interactions between rhythms of different frequencies from experimental data.
    Onojima T; Goto T; Mizuhara H; Aoyagi T
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Jan; 14(1):e1005928. PubMed ID: 29337999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data-driven modeling of phase interactions between spontaneous MEG oscillations.
    Hindriks R; Bijma F; van Dijk BW; Stam CJ; van der Werf YY; van Someren EJ; de Munck JC; van der Vaart AW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2011 Jul; 32(7):1161-78. PubMed ID: 21225630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic causal modelling of EEG and fMRI to characterize network architectures in a simple motor task.
    Bönstrup M; Schulz R; Feldheim J; Hummel FC; Gerloff C
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):498-508. PubMed ID: 26334836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the stability of the n:m phase synchronization index.
    Wacker M; Witte H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Feb; 58(2):332-8. PubMed ID: 20682469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The emergence of abnormal hypersynchronization in the anatomical structural network of human brain.
    Yan B; Li P
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():34-51. PubMed ID: 23000784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applying EEG phase synchronization measures to non-linearly coupled neural mass models.
    Vindiola MM; Vettel JM; Gordon SM; Franaszczuk PJ; McDowell K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Apr; 226():1-14. PubMed ID: 24485868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic Causal Models for phase coupling.
    Penny WD; Litvak V; Fuentemilla L; Duzel E; Friston K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Sep; 183(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 19576931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An extension of Phase Linearity Measurement for revealing cross frequency coupling among brain areas.
    Sorrentino P; Ambrosanio M; Rucco R; Baselice F
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Nov; 16(1):135. PubMed ID: 31699104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Kuramoto model simulation of neural hubs and dynamic synchrony in the human cerebral connectome.
    Schmidt R; LaFleur KJ; de Reus MA; van den Berg LH; van den Heuvel MP
    BMC Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 16():54. PubMed ID: 26329640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An EEG study of brain connectivity dynamics at the resting state.
    Dimitriadis SI; Laskaris NA; Tsirka V; Vourkas M; Micheloyannis S
    Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci; 2012 Jan; 16(1):5-22. PubMed ID: 22196109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physiologically informed dynamic causal modeling of fMRI data.
    Havlicek M; Roebroeck A; Friston K; Gardumi A; Ivanov D; Uludag K
    Neuroimage; 2015 Nov; 122():355-72. PubMed ID: 26254113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Communication between Brain Areas Based on Nested Oscillations.
    Bonnefond M; Kastner S; Jensen O
    eNeuro; 2017; 4(2):. PubMed ID: 28374013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phase-lags in large scale brain synchronization: Methodological considerations and in-silico analysis.
    Petkoski S; Palva JM; Jirsa VK
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Jul; 14(7):e1006160. PubMed ID: 29990339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the importance of modeling fMRI transients when estimating effective connectivity: A dynamic causal modeling study using ASL data.
    Havlicek M; Roebroeck A; Friston KJ; Gardumi A; Ivanov D; Uludag K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jul; 155():217-233. PubMed ID: 28323165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inferring functional neural connectivity with phase synchronization analysis: a review of methodology.
    Sun J; Li Z; Tong S
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():239210. PubMed ID: 22577470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mass synchronization: occurrence and its control with possible applications to brain dynamics.
    Chandrasekar VK; Sheeba JH; Lakshmanan M
    Chaos; 2010 Dec; 20(4):045106. PubMed ID: 21198118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Study of effective connectivity based on dynamic causal modeling in subtraction calculation task].
    Zhang Y; Chen C; Lu G; Zhang Z; Yu H; Huang W; Chen Z; Zhong Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Oct; 26(5):931-5, 940. PubMed ID: 19947462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binding events through the mutual synchronization of spintronic nano-neurons.
    Romera M; Talatchian P; Tsunegi S; Yakushiji K; Fukushima A; Kubota H; Yuasa S; Cros V; Bortolotti P; Ernoult M; Querlioz D; Grollier J
    Nat Commun; 2022 Feb; 13(1):883. PubMed ID: 35169115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.