147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30786764)
1. Comparing membrane and spacer biofouling by Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Gram-positive Anoxybacillus sp. in forward osmosis.
Bogler A; Rice D; Perreault F; Bar-Zeev E
Biofouling; 2019 Jan; 35(1):104-116. PubMed ID: 30786764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biofouling Mitigation by Chloramination during Forward Osmosis Filtration of Wastewater.
Fujioka T; Nguyen KH; Hoang AT; Ueyama T; Yasui H; Terashima M; Nghiem LD
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Sep; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 30261685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impaired Performance of Pressure-Retarded Osmosis due to Irreversible Biofouling.
Bar-Zeev E; Perreault F; Straub AP; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Nov; 49(21):13050-8. PubMed ID: 26426100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems.
Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():227-42. PubMed ID: 25282091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of higher alginate expression on deposition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in radial stagnation point flow and reverse osmosis systems.
Herzberg M; Rezene TZ; Ziemba C; Gillor O; Mathee K
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Oct; 43(19):7376-83. PubMed ID: 19848149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of Reverse Divalent Cation Diffusion in Forward Osmosis Biofouling.
Xie M; Bar-Zeev E; Hashmi SM; Nghiem LD; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Nov; 49(22):13222-9. PubMed ID: 26503882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of organic micropollutants on biofouling in a forward osmosis process integrating seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation.
Kim Y; Kim LH; Vrouwenvelder JS; Ghaffour N
J Hazard Mater; 2021 Jan; 401():123386. PubMed ID: 32653793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of spacer thickness on biofouling in forward osmosis.
Valladares Linares R; Bucs SS; Li Z; AbuGhdeeb M; Amy G; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2014 Jun; 57():223-33. PubMed ID: 24726992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biofouling Mitigation in Forward Osmosis Using Graphene Oxide Functionalized Thin-Film Composite Membranes.
Perreault F; Jaramillo H; Xie M; Ude M; Nghiem LD; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jun; 50(11):5840-8. PubMed ID: 27160324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biofouling control of a forward osmosis membrane during single-pass pre-concentration of wastewater.
Fujioka T; Tra Ngo MT; Mochochoko T; Boivin S; Ohkuma N; Yasui H; Terashima M
Chemosphere; 2020 Oct; 257():127263. PubMed ID: 32512337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Physiology and genetic traits of reverse osmosis membrane biofilms: a case study with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Herzberg M; Elimelech M
ISME J; 2008 Feb; 2(2):180-94. PubMed ID: 18049459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of supercritical CO₂ treatment for controlling biofouling in the reverse osmosis process.
Mun S; Baek Y; Kim C; Lee YW; Yoon J
Biofouling; 2012; 28(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 22726211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes.
Herzberg M; Kang S; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(12):4393-8. PubMed ID: 19603652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristics of organic fouling, reversibility by physical cleaning and concentrates in forward osmosis membrane processes for wastewater reclamation.
Jung J; Ryu J; Yu Y; Kweon J
Chemosphere; 2020 Apr; 245():125787. PubMed ID: 31959357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Membrane Distillation Biofouling: Impact of Feedwater Temperature on Biofilm Characteristics and Membrane Performance.
Bogler A; Bar-Zeev E
Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Sep; 52(17):10019-10029. PubMed ID: 30080406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined effects of Pseudomonas quinolone signal-based quorum quenching and graphene oxide on the mitigation of biofouling and improvement of the application potential for the thin-film composite membrane.
Li Y; Yang Y; Feng Y; Pu J; Hou LA
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Mar; 760():143348. PubMed ID: 33162137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multispecies biofilms on reverse osmosis membrane dictate the function and characteristics of the bacterial communities rather than their structure.
Ran N; Sorek G; Stein N; Sharon-Gojman R; Herzberg M; Gillor O
Environ Res; 2023 Aug; 231(Pt 1):115999. PubMed ID: 37105294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of the performance behavior of a forward osmosis membrane system using various feed spacer materials fabricated by 3D printing technique.
Yanar N; Son M; Yang E; Kim Y; Park H; Nam SE; Choi H
Chemosphere; 2018 Jul; 202():708-715. PubMed ID: 29602103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bacterial adhesion onto nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: effect of permeate flux.
Semião AJ; Habimana O; Casey E
Water Res; 2014 Oct; 63():296-305. PubMed ID: 25016321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of anti-biofouling feed spacers to improve performance of reverse osmosis modules.
Rice D; Barrios AC; Xiao Z; Bogler A; Bar-Zeev E; Perreault F
Water Res; 2018 Nov; 145():599-607. PubMed ID: 30199804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
