These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30786898)

  • 1. Quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: agreement of software from three different vendors on assessment of left ventricular function, 2D flow and parametric mapping.
    Zange L; Muehlberg F; Blaszczyk E; Schwenke S; Traber J; Funk S; Schulz-Menger J
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Feb; 21(1):12. PubMed ID: 30786898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Compressed sensing real-time cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance: accurate assessment of left ventricular function in a single-breath-hold.
    Kido T; Kido T; Nakamura M; Watanabe K; Schmidt M; Forman C; Mochizuki T
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Aug; 18(1):50. PubMed ID: 27553656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fully automated quantification of biventricular volumes and function in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: applicability to clinical routine settings.
    Backhaus SJ; Staab W; Steinmetz M; Ritter CO; Lotz J; Hasenfuß G; Schuster A; Kowallick JT
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Apr; 21(1):24. PubMed ID: 31023305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance image analysis with fully convolutional networks.
    Bai W; Sinclair M; Tarroni G; Oktay O; Rajchl M; Vaillant G; Lee AM; Aung N; Lukaschuk E; Sanghvi MM; Zemrak F; Fung K; Paiva JM; Carapella V; Kim YJ; Suzuki H; Kainz B; Matthews PM; Petersen SE; Piechnik SK; Neubauer S; Glocker B; Rueckert D
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Sep; 20(1):65. PubMed ID: 30217194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A deep learning pipeline for automatic analysis of multi-scan cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Fadil H; Totman JJ; Hausenloy DJ; Ho HH; Joseph P; Low AF; Richards AM; Chan MY; Marchesseau S
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Apr; 23(1):47. PubMed ID: 33896419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fully-automated left ventricular mass and volume MRI analysis in the UK Biobank population cohort: evaluation of initial results.
    Suinesiaputra A; Sanghvi MM; Aung N; Paiva JM; Zemrak F; Fung K; Lukaschuk E; Lee AM; Carapella V; Kim YJ; Francis J; Piechnik SK; Neubauer S; Greiser A; Jolly MP; Hayes C; Young AA; Petersen SE
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Feb; 34(2):281-291. PubMed ID: 28836039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compressed sensing cine imaging with high spatial or high temporal resolution for analysis of left ventricular function.
    Goebel J; Nensa F; Schemuth HP; Maderwald S; Gratz M; Quick HH; Schlosser T; Nassenstein K
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Aug; 44(2):366-74. PubMed ID: 26789014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of global left ventricular function with dual-source computed tomography in patients with valvular heart disease.
    Bak SH; Ko SM; Jeon HJ; Yang HS; Hwang HK; Song MG
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 22319133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of cine CMR imaging at 0.55 T and 1.5 T.
    Bandettini WP; Shanbhag SM; Mancini C; McGuirt DR; Kellman P; Xue H; Henry JL; Lowery M; Thein SL; Chen MY; Campbell-Washburn AE
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 May; 22(1):37. PubMed ID: 32423456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved workflow for quantification of left ventricular volumes and mass using free-breathing motion corrected cine imaging.
    Cross R; Olivieri L; O'Brien K; Kellman P; Xue H; Hansen M
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Feb; 18():10. PubMed ID: 26915830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breath-hold and free-breathing quantitative assessment of biventricular volume and function using compressed SENSE: a clinical validation in children and young adults.
    Kocaoglu M; Pednekar AS; Wang H; Alsaied T; Taylor MD; Rattan MS
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Jul; 22(1):54. PubMed ID: 32713347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of right and left ventricular functional assessment by short-axis vs axial cine steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance imaging: intrapatient correlation with main pulmonary artery and ascending aorta phase-contrast flow measurements.
    James SH; Wald R; Wintersperger BJ; Jimenez-Juan L; Deva D; Crean AM; Nguyen E; Paul NS; Ley S
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2013 Aug; 64(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 22579337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of different cardiovascular magnetic resonance sequences for native myocardial T1 mapping at 3T.
    Teixeira T; Hafyane T; Stikov N; Akdeniz C; Greiser A; Friedrich MG
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Oct; 18(1):65. PubMed ID: 27716344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of left ventricular and left atrial volumetric function from native MR multislice 4D flow magnitude data.
    Reiter C; Reiter G; Kräuter C; Scherr D; Schmidt A; Fuchsjäger M; Reiter U
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):981-993. PubMed ID: 37580598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. T1 mapping and T2 mapping at 3T for quantifying the area-at-risk in reperfused STEMI patients.
    Bulluck H; White SK; Rosmini S; Bhuva A; Treibel TA; Fontana M; Abdel-Gadir A; Herrey A; Manisty C; Wan SM; Groves A; Menezes L; Moon JC; Hausenloy DJ
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Aug; 17(1):73. PubMed ID: 26264813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and Time-Efficiency of an Automated Software Tool to Assess Left Ventricular Parameters in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Bartolomé P; Caballeros M; Quílez-Larragan A; Núñez-Córdoba JM; Fernández González Ó; Ezponda A; Bastarrika G
    J Thorac Imaging; 2020 Jan; 35(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 31651691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variability in cardiac MR measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction, volumes and mass in healthy adults: defining a significant change at 1 year.
    Moody WE; Edwards NC; Chue CD; Taylor RJ; Ferro CJ; Townend JN; Steeds RP
    Br J Radiol; 2015 May; 88(1049):20140831. PubMed ID: 25710361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of both DENSE and feature tracking techniques with tagging for the cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of myocardial strain.
    Cao JJ; Ngai N; Duncanson L; Cheng J; Gliganic K; Chen Q
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Apr; 20(1):26. PubMed ID: 29669563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Knowledge-based reconstruction of right ventricular volumes using real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic as well as cardiac magnetic resonance images: comparison with a cardiac magnetic resonance standard.
    Laser KT; Horst JP; Barth P; Kelter-Klöpping A; Haas NA; Burchert W; Kececioglu D; Körperich H
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Oct; 27(10):1087-97. PubMed ID: 24969839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New generation 3-dimensional echocardiography for left ventricular volumetric and functional measurements: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Nikitin NP; Constantin C; Loh PH; Ghosh J; Lukaschuk EI; Bennett A; Hurren S; Alamgir F; Clark AL; Cleland JG
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2006 Oct; 7(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 16916621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.