229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30786898)
21. Correlation of trabeculae and papillary muscles with clinical and cardiac characteristics and impact on CMR measures of LV anatomy and function.
Chuang ML; Gona P; Hautvast GL; Salton CJ; Blease SJ; Yeon SB; Breeuwer M; O'Donnell CJ; Manning WJ
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1115-23. PubMed ID: 23153911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative functional analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging].
Koch K; Oellig F; Kunz P; Bender P; Oberholzer K; Mildenberger P; Hake U; Kreitner KF; Thelen M
Rofo; 2004 Dec; 176(12):1786-93. PubMed ID: 15573290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Performance of new automated transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiographic software for left ventricular volumes and function assessment in routine clinical practice: Comparison with 3 Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance.
Levy F; Dan Schouver E; Iacuzio L; Civaia F; Rusek S; Dommerc C; Marechaux S; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Nov; 110(11):580-589. PubMed ID: 28566200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of fully automated assessment on interstudy reproducibility of biventricular volumes and function in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Backhaus SJ; Schuster A; Lange T; Stehning C; Billing M; Lotz J; Pieske B; Hasenfuß G; Kelle S; Kowallick JT
Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):11648. PubMed ID: 34078942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Quantitative analysis of cardiac left ventricular variables obtained by MRI at 3 T: a pre- and post-contrast comparison.
Matthew S; Gandy SJ; Nicholas RS; Waugh SA; Crowe EA; Lerski RA; Dunn MH; Houston JG
Br J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1015):e343-7. PubMed ID: 22745212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cardiac Involvement in Patients Recovered From COVID-2019 Identified Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Huang L; Zhao P; Tang D; Zhu T; Han R; Zhan C; Liu W; Zeng H; Tao Q; Xia L
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Nov; 13(11):2330-2339. PubMed ID: 32763118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular function with dual-source CT in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial findings.
Busch S; Johnson TR; Wintersperger BJ; Minaifar N; Bhargava A; Rist C; Reiser MF; Becker C; Nikolaou K
Eur Radiol; 2008 Mar; 18(3):570-5. PubMed ID: 17909817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking using a non-rigid, elastic image registration algorithm: assessment of variability in a real-life clinical setting.
Morais P; Marchi A; Bogaert JA; Dresselaers T; Heyde B; D'hooge J; Bogaert J
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Feb; 19(1):24. PubMed ID: 28209163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Feasibility of Single-Breath-Hold Compressed Sensing Real-Time Cine Imaging for Assessment of Ventricular Function and Left Ventricular Strain in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance].
Deng Q; Tang L; Wu X; Wu T; He S; Li L; Cheng W; Diao YK; Diao KY; Yue WJ; Chen YC; Sun JY
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2022 May; 53(3):497-503. PubMed ID: 35642161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Automated quantification of mitral inflow and aortic outflow stroke volumes by three-dimensional real-time volume color-flow Doppler transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with pulsed-wave Doppler and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Thavendiranathan P; Liu S; Datta S; Walls M; Nitinunu A; Van Houten T; Tomson NA; Vidmar L; Georgescu B; Wang Y; Srinivasan S; De Michelis N; Raman SV; Ryan T; Vannan MA
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2012 Jan; 25(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 22105057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effects of extracellular contrast agent (Gadobutrol) on the precision and reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking.
Kuetting DL; Dabir D; Homsi R; Sprinkart AM; Luetkens J; Schild HH; Thomas DK
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 May; 18(1):30. PubMed ID: 27209219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of myocardial involvement in patients with connective tissue disorders: a multi-parametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.
Mayr A; Kitterer D; Latus J; Steubing H; Henes J; Vecchio F; Kaesemann P; Patrascu A; Greiser A; Groeninger S; Braun N; Alscher MD; Sechtem U; Mahrholdt H; Greulich S
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Oct; 18(1):67. PubMed ID: 27733210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Flow measurement at the aortic root - impact of location of through-plane phase contrast velocity mapping.
Bertelsen L; Svendsen JH; Køber L; Haugan K; Højberg S; Thomsen C; Vejlstrup N
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Sep; 18(1):55. PubMed ID: 27599727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional cardiac magnetic resonance feature-tracking myocardial strain analysis in acute myocarditis patients with preserved ejection fraction.
Gatti M; Palmisano A; Faletti R; Benedetti G; Bergamasco L; Bioletto F; Peretto G; Sala S; De Cobelli F; Fonio P; Esposito A
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jun; 35(6):1101-1109. PubMed ID: 30929101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison of Volume-Time Curves Derived from Long- and Short-Axis Cine Steady-State Free Precession Datasets.
Schaafs LA; Wyschkon S; Elgeti M; Nagel SN; Knebel F; Steffen IG; Makowski MR; Hamm B; Elgeti T
Rofo; 2020 Aug; 192(8):764-775. PubMed ID: 32106325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantification of left ventricular indices from SSFP cine imaging: impact of real-world variability in analysis methodology and utility of geometric modeling.
Miller CA; Jordan P; Borg A; Argyle R; Clark D; Pearce K; Schmitt M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 May; 37(5):1213-22. PubMed ID: 23124767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Right ventricular assessment at cardiac MRI: initial clinical experience utilizing an IS-SENSE reconstruction.
Bogachkov A; Ayache JB; Allen BD; Murphy I; Carr ML; Spottiswoode B; Schmidt M; Zenge MO; Nadar MS; Zuehlsdorff S; Freed BH; Carr JC; Collins JD
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 32(7):1081-91. PubMed ID: 27091733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Inter-scanner comparability of Z-scores for native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping.
Razzaq S; Haririsanati L; Eyre K; Garg R; Chetrit M; Friedrich MG
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2024 Summer; 26(1):100004. PubMed ID: 38211657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Single breath hold 3D cardiac cine MRI using kat-ARC: preliminary results at 1.5T.
Jeong D; Schiebler ML; Lai P; Wang K; Vigen KK; François CJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Apr; 31(4):851-7. PubMed ID: 25680356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of left ventricular function assessment using phonocardiogram- and electrocardiogram-triggered 2D SSFP CINE MR imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T.
Becker M; Frauenrath T; Hezel F; Krombach GA; Kremer U; Koppers B; Butenweg C; Goemmel A; Utting JF; Schulz-Menger J; Niendorf T
Eur Radiol; 2010 Jun; 20(6):1344-55. PubMed ID: 20013275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
