149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30786933)
1. Still moving toward automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the third meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Gilbert SB; Thayer KA; Shemilt I; Thomas J; Glasziou P; Wolfe MS
Syst Rev; 2019 Feb; 8(1):57. PubMed ID: 30786933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Gilbert SB; Thayer KA; Wolfe MS
Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 7(1):3. PubMed ID: 29316980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A focus on cross-purpose tools, automated recognition of study design in multiple disciplines, and evaluation of automation tools: a summary of significant discussions at the fourth meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
O'Connor AM; Glasziou P; Taylor M; Thomas J; Spijker R; Wolfe MS
Syst Rev; 2020 May; 9(1):100. PubMed ID: 32366302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
Beller E; Clark J; Tsafnat G; Adams C; Diehl H; Lund H; Ouzzani M; Thayer K; Thomas J; Turner T; Xia J; Robinson K; Glasziou P;
Syst Rev; 2018 May; 7(1):77. PubMed ID: 29778096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usage of automation tools in systematic reviews.
van Altena AJ; Spijker R; Olabarriaga SD
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 30561081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A narrative review of recent tools and innovations toward automating living systematic reviews and evidence syntheses.
Schmidt L; Sinyor M; Webb RT; Marshall C; Knipe D; Eyles EC; John A; Gunnell D; Higgins JPT
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2023 Sep; 181():65-75. PubMed ID: 37596160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies?
O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Thomas J; Glasziou P; Gilbert SB; Hutton B
Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 8(1):143. PubMed ID: 31215463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey.
Scott AM; Forbes C; Clark J; Carter M; Glasziou P; Munn Z
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():80-94. PubMed ID: 34242757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis.
Marshall IJ; Wallace BC
Syst Rev; 2019 Jul; 8(1):163. PubMed ID: 31296265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: A living review protocol.
Schmidt L; Olorisade BK; McGuinness LA; Thomas J; Higgins JPT
F1000Res; 2020; 9():210. PubMed ID: 32724560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Editorial: Systematic review automation thematic series.
Lau J
Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 8(1):70. PubMed ID: 30857554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of a traditional systematic review approach with review-of-reviews and semi-automation as strategies to update the evidence.
Reddy SM; Patel S; Weyrich M; Fenton J; Viswanathan M
Syst Rev; 2020 Oct; 9(1):243. PubMed ID: 33076975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review.
Khalil H; Ameen D; Zarnegar A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 144():22-42. PubMed ID: 34896236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The views of health guideline developers on the use of automation in health evidence synthesis.
Arno A; Elliott J; Wallace B; Turner T; Thomas J
Syst Rev; 2021 Jan; 10(1):16. PubMed ID: 33419479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Systematic online living evidence summaries: emerging tools to accelerate evidence synthesis.
Hair K; Wilson E; Wong C; Tsang A; Macleod M; Bannach-Brown A
Clin Sci (Lond); 2023 May; 137(10):773-784. PubMed ID: 37219941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usability and acceptability of four systematic review automation software packages: a mixed method design.
Cleo G; Scott AM; Islam F; Julien B; Beller E
Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 8(1):145. PubMed ID: 31221212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identifying Opportunities for Workflow Automation in Health Care: Lessons Learned from Other Industries.
Zayas-Cabán T; Haque SN; Kemper N
Appl Clin Inform; 2021 May; 12(3):686-697. PubMed ID: 34320683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved compliance by BPM-driven workflow automation.
Holzmüller-Laue S; Göde B; Fleischer H; Thurow K
J Lab Autom; 2014 Dec; 19(6):528-45. PubMed ID: 25246440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic reviewers used various approaches to data extraction and expressed several research needs: a survey.
Büchter RB; Rombey T; Mathes T; Khalil H; Lunny C; Pollock D; Puljak L; Tricco AC; Pieper D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jul; 159():214-224. PubMed ID: 37286149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The semi-automation of title and abstract screening: a retrospective exploration of ways to leverage Abstrackr's relevance predictions in systematic and rapid reviews.
Gates A; Gates M; Sebastianski M; Guitard S; Elliott SA; Hartling L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):139. PubMed ID: 32493228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
