These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30786933)

  • 21. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Screening Automation in Systematic Reviews: Analysis of Tools and Their Machine Learning Capabilities.
    Sandner E; Gütl C; Jakovljevic I; Wagner A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2024 Apr; 313():179-185. PubMed ID: 38682527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
    Ruano J; Gómez-García F; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Alcalde-Mellado P; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Viguera-Guerra I; Franco-García F; Cárdenas-Aranzana M; Romero JLH; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Isla-Tejera B; Garcia-Nieto AV
    Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cervical screening programmes: can automation help? Evidence from systematic reviews, an economic analysis and a simulation modelling exercise applied to the UK.
    Willis BH; Barton P; Pearmain P; Bryan S; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(13):1-207, iii. PubMed ID: 15774236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Evidence synthesis 2.0: how artificial intelligence is making systematic reviews more efficient.].
    Petri D
    Recenti Prog Med; 2023 Jun; 114(6):359-361. PubMed ID: 37229683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Choice of data extraction tools for systematic reviews depends on resources and review complexity.
    Elamin MB; Flynn DN; Bassler D; Briel M; Alonso-Coello P; Karanicolas PJ; Guyatt GH; Malaga G; Furukawa TA; Kunz R; Schünemann H; Murad MH; Barbui C; Cipriani A; Montori VM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 May; 62(5):506-10. PubMed ID: 19348977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A review of the reporting of web searching to identify studies for Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Briscoe S
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 29065246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. International collaboration in conducting systematic reviews: the Cochrane Collaborative Review Group on HIV Infection and AIDS.
    Kennedy GE; Peersman G; Rutherford GW
    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2002 Jul; 30 Suppl 1():S56-61. PubMed ID: 12107360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Introducing RAPTOR: RevMan Parsing Tool for Reviewers.
    Schmidt L; Shokraneh F; Steinhausen K; Adams CE
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 8(1):151. PubMed ID: 31242929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Training sample selection: Impact on screening automation in diagnostic test accuracy reviews.
    van Altena AJ; Spijker R; Leeflang MMG; Olabarriaga SD
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Nov; 12(6):831-841. PubMed ID: 34390193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evolution of international collaborative research efforts to develop non-Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Viguera-Guerra I; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Gay-Mimbrera J; Montilla A; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Gómez-Arias PJ; Vélez García-Nieto A; Gómez-Garcia F; Isla-Tejera B
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211919. PubMed ID: 30811451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
    Walters SJ; Stern C; Robertson-Malt S
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):138-97. PubMed ID: 27532315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group.
    van Tulder M; Furlan A; Bombardier C; Bouter L;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(12):1290-9. PubMed ID: 12811274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Systematic review automation technologies.
    Tsafnat G; Glasziou P; Choong MK; Dunn A; Galgani F; Coiera E
    Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; 3():74. PubMed ID: 25005128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Principles for Designing and Developing a Workflow Monitoring Tool to Enable and Enhance Clinical Workflow Automation.
    Wu DTY; Barrick L; Ozkaynak M; Blondon K; Zheng K
    Appl Clin Inform; 2022 Jan; 13(1):132-138. PubMed ID: 35045584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of a rule-based method for epidemiological document classification towards the automation of systematic reviews.
    Karystianis G; Thayer K; Wolfe M; Tsafnat G
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 Jun; 70():27-34. PubMed ID: 28455150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Cochrane Collaboration Stroke Review Group. Meeting the need for systematic reviews in stroke care.
    Counsell C; Warlow C; Sandercock P; Fraser H; van Gijn J
    Stroke; 1995 Mar; 26(3):498-502. PubMed ID: 7886733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evidence synthesis relevant to COVID-19: a protocol for multiple systematic reviews and overviews of systematic reviews.
    Rada G; Verdugo-Paiva F; Ávila C; Morel-Marambio M; Bravo-Jeria R; Pesce F; Madrid E; Izcovich A;
    Medwave; 2020 Apr; 20(3):e7868. PubMed ID: 32255438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
    Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Future of Health Care: Protocol for Measuring the Potential of Task Automation Grounded in the National Health Service Primary Care System.
    Willis M; Duckworth P; Coulter A; Meyer ET; Osborne M
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2019 Apr; 8(4):e11232. PubMed ID: 30964437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.