571 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30786997)
1. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial.
Keulen JK; Bruinsma A; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; Bossuyt PM; Oudijk MA; Duijnhoven RG; van Kaam AH; Vandenbussche FP; van der Post JA; Mol BW; de Miranda E
BMJ; 2019 Feb; 364():l344. PubMed ID: 30786997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial.
Wennerholm UB; Saltvedt S; Wessberg A; Alkmark M; Bergh C; Wendel SB; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Sengpiel V; Wesström J; Wennergren G; Wikström AK; Elden H; Stephansson O; Hagberg H
BMJ; 2019 Nov; 367():l6131. PubMed ID: 31748223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation.
Middleton P; Shepherd E; Morris J; Crowther CA; Gomersall JC
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jul; 7(7):CD004945. PubMed ID: 32666584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks: A systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Alkmark M; Keulen JKJ; Kortekaas JC; Bergh C; van Dillen J; Duijnhoven RG; Hagberg H; Mol BW; Molin M; van der Post JAM; Saltvedt S; Wikström AK; Wennerholm UB; de Miranda E
PLoS Med; 2020 Dec; 17(12):e1003436. PubMed ID: 33290410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials.
Bernardes TP; Broekhuijsen K; Koopmans CM; Boers KE; van Wyk L; Tajik P; van Pampus MG; Scherjon SA; Mol BW; Franssen MT; van den Berg PP; Groen H
BJOG; 2016 Aug; 123(9):1501-8. PubMed ID: 27173131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Grobman WA; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30817905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of induction of labour versus expectant management in women with impending post-term pregnancies: the 41 week - 42 week dilemma.
Kortekaas JC; Bruinsma A; Keulen JK; van Dillen J; Oudijk MA; Zwart JJ; Bakker JJ; de Bont D; Nieuwenhuijze M; Offerhaus PM; van Kaam AH; Vandenbussche F; Mol BW; de Miranda E
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Oct; 14():350. PubMed ID: 25338555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Timing induction of labour at 41 or 42 weeks? A closer look at time frames of comparison: A review.
Keulen JKJ; Bruinsma A; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; van der Post JAM; de Miranda E
Midwifery; 2018 Nov; 66():111-118. PubMed ID: 30170263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study.
Stock SJ; Ferguson E; Duffy A; Ford I; Chalmers J; Norman JE
BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e2838. PubMed ID: 22577197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Elective induction of labour and expectant management in late-term pregnancy: A prospective cohort study alongside the INDEX randomised controlled trial.
Bruinsma A; Keulen JK; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; Duijnhoven RG; Bossuyt PM; van Kaam AH; van der Post JA; Mol BW; de Miranda E
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X; 2022 Dec; 16():100165. PubMed ID: 36262791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Planned early delivery or expectant management for late preterm pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX): a randomised controlled trial.
Chappell LC; Brocklehurst P; Green ME; Hunter R; Hardy P; Juszczak E; Linsell L; Chiocchia V; Greenland M; Placzek A; Townend J; Marlow N; Sandall J; Shennan A;
Lancet; 2019 Sep; 394(10204):1181-1190. PubMed ID: 31472930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.
Gülmezoglu AM; Crowther CA; Middleton P; Heatley E
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Jun; 6(6):CD004945. PubMed ID: 22696345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of induction of labor prior to post-term in low-risk pregnancies: a systematic review.
Rydahl E; Eriksen L; Juhl M
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Feb; 17(2):170-208. PubMed ID: 30299344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT).
Boers KE; Vijgen SM; Bijlenga D; van der Post JA; Bekedam DJ; Kwee A; van der Salm PC; van Pampus MG; Spaanderman ME; de Boer K; Duvekot JJ; Bremer HA; Hasaart TH; Delemarre FM; Bloemenkamp KW; van Meir CA; Willekes C; Wijnen EJ; Rijken M; le Cessie S; Roumen FJ; Thornton JG; van Lith JM; Mol BW; Scherjon SA;
BMJ; 2010 Dec; 341():c7087. PubMed ID: 21177352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial.
Boulvain M; Senat MV; Perrotin F; Winer N; Beucher G; Subtil D; Bretelle F; Azria E; Hejaiej D; Vendittelli F; Capelle M; Langer B; Matis R; Connan L; Gillard P; Kirkpatrick C; Ceysens G; Faron G; Irion O; Rozenberg P;
Lancet; 2015 Jun; 385(9987):2600-5. PubMed ID: 25863654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks.
Elden H; Hagberg H; Wessberg A; Sengpiel V; Herbst A; Bullarbo M; Bergh C; Bolin K; Malbasic S; Saltvedt S; Stephansson O; Wikström AK; Ladfors L; Wennerholm UB
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Mar; 16():49. PubMed ID: 26951777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [In case of fetal macrosomia, the best strategy is the induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation].
Rozenberg P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Nov; 45(9):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 27771202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immediate delivery or expectant management in gestational diabetes at term: the GINEXMAL randomised controlled trial.
Alberico S; Erenbourg A; Hod M; Yogev Y; Hadar E; Neri F; Ronfani L; Maso G;
BJOG; 2017 Mar; 124(4):669-677. PubMed ID: 27813240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immediate delivery compared with expectant management after preterm pre-labour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMT trial): a randomised controlled trial.
Morris JM; Roberts CL; Bowen JR; Patterson JA; Bond DM; Algert CS; Thornton JG; Crowther CA;
Lancet; 2016 Jan; 387(10017):444-52. PubMed ID: 26564381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
