These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

574 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30786997)

  • 1. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Keulen JK; Bruinsma A; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; Bossuyt PM; Oudijk MA; Duijnhoven RG; van Kaam AH; Vandenbussche FP; van der Post JA; Mol BW; de Miranda E
    BMJ; 2019 Feb; 364():l344. PubMed ID: 30786997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial.
    Wennerholm UB; Saltvedt S; Wessberg A; Alkmark M; Bergh C; Wendel SB; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Sengpiel V; Wesström J; Wennergren G; Wikström AK; Elden H; Stephansson O; Hagberg H
    BMJ; 2019 Nov; 367():l6131. PubMed ID: 31748223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation.
    Middleton P; Shepherd E; Morris J; Crowther CA; Gomersall JC
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jul; 7(7):CD004945. PubMed ID: 32666584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks: A systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials.
    Alkmark M; Keulen JKJ; Kortekaas JC; Bergh C; van Dillen J; Duijnhoven RG; Hagberg H; Mol BW; Molin M; van der Post JAM; Saltvedt S; Wikström AK; Wennerholm UB; de Miranda E
    PLoS Med; 2020 Dec; 17(12):e1003436. PubMed ID: 33290410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials.
    Bernardes TP; Broekhuijsen K; Koopmans CM; Boers KE; van Wyk L; Tajik P; van Pampus MG; Scherjon SA; Mol BW; Franssen MT; van den Berg PP; Groen H
    BJOG; 2016 Aug; 123(9):1501-8. PubMed ID: 27173131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
    Grobman WA; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30817905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of induction of labour versus expectant management in women with impending post-term pregnancies: the 41 week - 42 week dilemma.
    Kortekaas JC; Bruinsma A; Keulen JK; van Dillen J; Oudijk MA; Zwart JJ; Bakker JJ; de Bont D; Nieuwenhuijze M; Offerhaus PM; van Kaam AH; Vandenbussche F; Mol BW; de Miranda E
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Oct; 14():350. PubMed ID: 25338555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Timing induction of labour at 41 or 42 weeks? A closer look at time frames of comparison: A review.
    Keulen JKJ; Bruinsma A; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; van der Post JAM; de Miranda E
    Midwifery; 2018 Nov; 66():111-118. PubMed ID: 30170263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study.
    Stock SJ; Ferguson E; Duffy A; Ford I; Chalmers J; Norman JE
    BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e2838. PubMed ID: 22577197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Planned early delivery or expectant management for late preterm pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX): a randomised controlled trial.
    Chappell LC; Brocklehurst P; Green ME; Hunter R; Hardy P; Juszczak E; Linsell L; Chiocchia V; Greenland M; Placzek A; Townend J; Marlow N; Sandall J; Shennan A;
    Lancet; 2019 Sep; 394(10204):1181-1190. PubMed ID: 31472930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elective induction of labour and expectant management in late-term pregnancy: A prospective cohort study alongside the INDEX randomised controlled trial.
    Bruinsma A; Keulen JK; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; Duijnhoven RG; Bossuyt PM; van Kaam AH; van der Post JA; Mol BW; de Miranda E
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X; 2022 Dec; 16():100165. PubMed ID: 36262791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.
    Gülmezoglu AM; Crowther CA; Middleton P; Heatley E
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Jun; 6(6):CD004945. PubMed ID: 22696345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT).
    Boers KE; Vijgen SM; Bijlenga D; van der Post JA; Bekedam DJ; Kwee A; van der Salm PC; van Pampus MG; Spaanderman ME; de Boer K; Duvekot JJ; Bremer HA; Hasaart TH; Delemarre FM; Bloemenkamp KW; van Meir CA; Willekes C; Wijnen EJ; Rijken M; le Cessie S; Roumen FJ; Thornton JG; van Lith JM; Mol BW; Scherjon SA;
    BMJ; 2010 Dec; 341():c7087. PubMed ID: 21177352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of induction of labor prior to post-term in low-risk pregnancies: a systematic review.
    Rydahl E; Eriksen L; Juhl M
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Feb; 17(2):170-208. PubMed ID: 30299344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial.
    Boulvain M; Senat MV; Perrotin F; Winer N; Beucher G; Subtil D; Bretelle F; Azria E; Hejaiej D; Vendittelli F; Capelle M; Langer B; Matis R; Connan L; Gillard P; Kirkpatrick C; Ceysens G; Faron G; Irion O; Rozenberg P;
    Lancet; 2015 Jun; 385(9987):2600-5. PubMed ID: 25863654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks.
    Elden H; Hagberg H; Wessberg A; Sengpiel V; Herbst A; Bullarbo M; Bergh C; Bolin K; Malbasic S; Saltvedt S; Stephansson O; Wikström AK; Ladfors L; Wennerholm UB
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Mar; 16():49. PubMed ID: 26951777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [In case of fetal macrosomia, the best strategy is the induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation].
    Rozenberg P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Nov; 45(9):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 27771202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate delivery or expectant management in gestational diabetes at term: the GINEXMAL randomised controlled trial.
    Alberico S; Erenbourg A; Hod M; Yogev Y; Hadar E; Neri F; Ronfani L; Maso G;
    BJOG; 2017 Mar; 124(4):669-677. PubMed ID: 27813240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immediate delivery compared with expectant management after preterm pre-labour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMT trial): a randomised controlled trial.
    Morris JM; Roberts CL; Bowen JR; Patterson JA; Bond DM; Algert CS; Thornton JG; Crowther CA;
    Lancet; 2016 Jan; 387(10017):444-52. PubMed ID: 26564381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
    Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.