These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30787558)

  • 1. Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Resin-based Pit and Fissure Sealant and Self-adhering Flowable Composite: An
    Wadhwa S; A Nayak U; Kappadi D; Prajapati D; Sharma R; Pawar A
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2018; 11(5):430-434. PubMed ID: 30787558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical Evaluation of the Retention of Self-adhering Flowable Composite as Fissure Sealant in 6-9-year-old Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Bhuvaneswari P; Vinay C; Uloopi KS; RojaRamya KS; Chandrasekhar R; Chaitanya P
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(3):322-326. PubMed ID: 35991800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention of pit and fissure sealant versus flowable composite: An
    Singh C; Kaur K; Kapoor K
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2019; 37(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 31710012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.
    Erdemir U; Sancakli HS; Yaman BC; Ozel S; Yucel T; Yıldız E
    J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 24296163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal Microleakage of Conventional Fissure Sealants and Self-Adhering Flowable Composite as Fissure Sealant in Permanent Teeth.
    Rahimian-Imam S; Ramazani N; Fayazi MR
    J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Jun; 12(6):430-5. PubMed ID: 26884777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. One-year Clinical Evaluation of Retention Ability and Anticaries Effect of a Glass Ionomer-based and a Resin-based Fissure Sealant on Permanent First Molars: An
    Mathew SR; Narayanan RK; Vadekkepurayil K; Puthiyapurayil J
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 12(6):553-559. PubMed ID: 32440074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Application of fluoride releasing flowable resin in pit and fissure sealant of children with early enamel caries].
    Yan WJ; Zheng JJ; Chen XX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Oct; 50(5):911-914. PubMed ID: 30337757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Different Fissure Sealant Materials and Flowable Composites Used as Pit-and-fissure Sealants: A 24-Month Clinical Trial.
    Kucukyilmaz E; Savas S
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(5):468-73. PubMed ID: 26531092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retention of a Flowable Composite Resin in Comparison to a Conventional Resin-Based Sealant: One-year Follow-up.
    Jafarzadeh M; Malekafzali B; Tadayon N; Fallahi S
    J Dent (Tehran); 2010; 7(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 21998768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of a fissure sealant and a flowable composite: A 36-month split-mouth, randomized clinical study.
    Ozan G; Sancakli HS; Erdemir U; Yaman BC; Yildiz SO; Yildiz E
    J Dent; 2022 Aug; 123():104205. PubMed ID: 35724939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retention of resin-based filled and unfilled pit and fissure sealants: A comparative clinical study.
    Reddy VR; Chowdhary N; Mukunda KS; Kiran NK; Kavyarani BS; Pradeep MC
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2015 Mar; 6(Suppl 1):S18-23. PubMed ID: 25821368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In Vitro Microleakage Comparison of Flowable Nanocomposites and Conventional Materials Used in Pit and Fissure Sealant Therapy.
    Arastoo S; Behbudi A; Rakhshan V
    Front Dent; 2019; 16(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 31608333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the marginal integrity of various pit and fissure sealants.
    Yaşa B; Erçin Ö; Hatırlı H
    J Oral Sci; 2023 Oct; 65(4):209-213. PubMed ID: 37518766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative Evaluation of Wear Strength and Compressive Strength of Two Pit and Fissure Sealants with a Nanofilled Resin Coating: An
    Gunasekaran R; Sharmin D; Baghkomeh PN; Jaganathan G; Ravindran V
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 Jan; 17(1):31-35. PubMed ID: 38559869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison and Clinical Evaluation of Two Pit and Fissure Sealants on Permanent Mandibular First Molars: An
    Smitha M; Paul ST; Nagaraj T; Khan AR; Rinu K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Oct; 20(10):1151-1158. PubMed ID: 31883249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Clinical evaluation of pit and fissure sealant with light-cured flowable resin and light-cured pit and fissure sealants].
    Cao HZ; Shu CB; Wang S; Huang W
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Oct; 20(5):545-7. PubMed ID: 22109377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of Penetration Depth and Microleakage of Different Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Dye Penetration Method: An
    Dixit A; Awasthi N; Jha S; Suprakasam S; Penumatsa NV; Vijayan AA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Aug; 22(8):890-893. PubMed ID: 34753840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An
    Singh R; Lakhanam M
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(3):304-310. PubMed ID: 35991789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the effect of three fissure preparation techniques on microleakage of a colored flowable composite used as a fissure sealant.
    Eliacik BK; Karahan M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Nov; 47(6):119-129. PubMed ID: 37997243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Evaluation of Retention of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Pit and Fissure Sealants in Permanent First Molars: An 18 Months Follow-up: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Gyati O; Jain M; Sogi S; Shahi P; Sharma P; Ramesh A
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023; 16(2):350-356. PubMed ID: 37519987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.