These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30787558)

  • 21. Retention of flowable composite resins in comparison to pit and fissure sealants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Taneja S; Singh A
    Gen Dent; 2020; 68(4):50-55. PubMed ID: 32597778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fluoride: Is It Worth to be added in Pit and Fissure Sealants?
    Prabhakar A; Dahake PT; Raju O; Basappa N
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012 Jan; 5(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 25206126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of Marginal Microleakage and Depth of Penetration of Different Materials Used as Pit and Fissure Sealants: An
    Butail A; Dua P; Mangla R; Saini S; Chauhan A; Rana S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 32581477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical evaluation of the retention of different pit and fissure sealants: a 1-year study.
    Kumaran P
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 6(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 25206219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Randomized, controlled trial comparing the retention of a flowable restorative system with a conventional resin sealant: one-year follow up.
    Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Garcia L; Ramos RP; Palma-Dibb RG
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Jan; 15(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 15663444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Microleakage of a Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite, a Self-Adhesive Fissure Sealant and a Conventional Fissure Sealant in Permanent Teeth with/without Saliva Contamination.
    Hosseinipour ZS; Heidari A; Shahrabi M; Poorzandpoush K
    Front Dent; 2019; 16(4):239-247. PubMed ID: 32342052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations.
    Qin M; Liu H
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):580-7. PubMed ID: 16268391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Glass Ionomer-based Sealant using ART Protocol and Resin-based Sealant on Primary Molars in Children.
    Kaverikana K; Vojjala B; Subramaniam P
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(6):724-728. PubMed ID: 36866139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Glass ionomer ART sealant and fluoride-releasing resin sealant in fissure caries prevention--results from a randomized clinical trial.
    Liu BY; Xiao Y; Chu CH; Lo EC
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 May; 14():54. PubMed ID: 24886444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative Evaluation of Different Varnishes and Pit and Fissure Sealants on
    Sharma R; Ghambir N; Gupta N; Singh R
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(3):362-365. PubMed ID: 35991797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant.
    Beresescu L; Kovacs M; Vlasa A; Stoica AM; Benedek C; Pop M; Bungardean D; Eșian D
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35206153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage Assessment of Two Different Pit and Fissure Sealants: A Comparative Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study.
    Prabakar J; Indiran MA; Kumar P; Dooraikannan S; Jeevanandan G
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(Suppl 1):S29-S33. PubMed ID: 34434011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparative evaluation of retention of pit and fissure sealant bonded using sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-generation adhesives: An
    Nirwan M; Nigam AG; Marwah N; Nayak UA; Bansal A; Gahlot MS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(4):359-366. PubMed ID: 28914250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparative study of two fissure sealants: a 2-year clinical follow-up.
    Yildiz E; Dörter C; Efes B; Koray F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 31(10):979-84. PubMed ID: 15387838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro comparison of microleakage of two materials used as pit and fissure sealants.
    Bahrololoomi Z; Soleymani A; Heydari Z
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2011; 5(3):83-6. PubMed ID: 22991611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of Shear Bond Strength and Marginal Sealing Ability of Pit and Fissure Sealants: An in vitro Study.
    Rani BSK; Viswambharapanicker S; Mattumathody S; Muralidharan A; Dinsha ARN; Saluja P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):642-646. PubMed ID: 29959289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative Assessment of Retention and Caries Protective Effectiveness of a Hydrophilic and a Conventional Sealant-A Clinical Trial.
    Beresescu L; Pacurar M; Vlasa A; Stoica AM; Dako T; Petcu B; Eșian D
    Children (Basel); 2022 Apr; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 35626822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Moisture Tolerant Pit and Fissure Sealant: A Literature Review.
    Priscilla S; Gs P; Mohandoss S; Kavitha M
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 37457211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of Sealing Marginal Occlusal Defects of Composite Restorations with a Nanofiller-Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite: A Double-Blind, Randomised Clinical Trial with One-Year Follow-Up.
    Estay J; Bersezio C; Faune J; Correa MP; Angel P; Martín J; Fernández E
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2018; 16(6):491-497. PubMed ID: 30574603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microleakage, adaptation ability and clinical efficacy of two fluoride releasing fissure sealants.
    Marković D; Petrović B; Perić T; Blagojević D
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2012 Apr; 69(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 22624423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.