These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3078791)

  • 1. [The identification and comparison of gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermentative bacteria by the conventional manual method and the Quantum II microbiology system].
    Akyön Y; Baykal M
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 1988 Jan; 22(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 3078791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram-negative bacilli.
    O'Hara CM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):928-33. PubMed ID: 16517878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cost-effective method for the presumptive identification of Enterobacteriaceae for diagnostic microbiology laboratories.
    Ng LS; Tan TY; Yeow SC
    Pathology; 2010 Apr; 42(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 20350223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Identification of gram-negative aerobic and non-fastidious aero-anaerobic bacilli using the ATB 32 GN system].
    Croize J; Rouhan D; Le Noc P
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1987; 45(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 3555180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Micro-ID, a modified Minitek system, and conventional methods for four-hour identification of Enterobacteriacae directly from blood cultures.
    Wellstood S
    Am J Med Technol; 1982 Sep; 48(9):769-73. PubMed ID: 6753582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Same day identification of gram-negative rods with the Quantum II Microbiology System.
    Von Graevenitz A; Kappeler-Stefanow P; Zollinger-Iten J
    Microbiologica; 1986 Jan; 9(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 3512962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A comparison of manual methods and enterotube II (Roche) for the identification of gram-negative enteric bacteria isolated from feces].
    Hasçelik G
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 1987 Oct; 21(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 3332703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of Micro-ID, API 20 E and a conventional technique for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae].
    Gregersen T; Persson B; Jensen MM
    Nord Vet Med; 1980 May; 32(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 6992099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [TTE-RAS (Titertek-Enterobac-Ras), a new micromethod for the semi-automatic identification of Enterobacteriaceae within 5 hours].
    Barth JG; Lett MC; Poindron P
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1987; 45(4):419-22. PubMed ID: 3314607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using SIB and API kits to identify and biotype enterobacteria of different origin.
    Kulinich LI; Fish NG; Mazitova OP; Dratvin SA; Birger MO
    J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1987; 31(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 3316379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a new commercial system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermentative bacteria.
    Geiss HK; Geiss M
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Jul; 11(7):610-6. PubMed ID: 1396768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Less frequently reported gram-negative fermentative rods.
    Nygaard GS
    Am J Med Technol; 1976 Mar; 42(3):79-91. PubMed ID: 769548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a test kit (Oxi/Ferm system) for identification of oxidase positive gram negative neoenteropathogenic bacteria.
    Sanyal SC; Ljungh A; Wadström T
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980; 248(3):384-91. PubMed ID: 7223128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Minitek test system with a conventional screening procedure for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Hanson CW; Marso E; Martin WJ
    Health Lab Sci; 1978 Jan; 15(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 346535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of six systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mastroeni P; Carbone M; Fera MT; Teti G
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1983; 76(1-6):3-19. PubMed ID: 6383930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of family Enterobacteriaceae using a three tube method.
    Kumar R; Saigal RK; Kanta S
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 35(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 1452243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Micro-ID, for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Izard D; Gavini F; Ochin D; Enayeh E; Leclerc H
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1980 Dec; 28(10):681-4. PubMed ID: 7008005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of results in the identification of various aerobic gram-negative bacteria in selected bacteriological laboratories in Poland].
    Kałuzewski S; Tyc Z; Szych J
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 1984; 36(3):153-77. PubMed ID: 6392790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enterobacteriaceae and other gram negative bacteria in the water of lakes used as open air baths around the city of Bratislava.
    Krcméry V
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B; 1983 Apr; 177(3-4):334-41. PubMed ID: 6367303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [API set used for the identification of Gram-negative bacteria from the Enterobacteriaceae family].
    Dzierzanowska D; Borowski J
    Pol Tyg Lek; 1975 May; 30(18):745-7. PubMed ID: 1094434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.