210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30788144)
21. EVOLUTION OF THE MAGNITUDE AND TIMING OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PLANTS.
Husband BC; Schemske DW
Evolution; 1996 Feb; 50(1):54-70. PubMed ID: 28568860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Analysis of inbreeding depression in mixed-mating plants provides evidence for selective interference and stable mixed mating.
Winn AA; Elle E; Kalisz S; Cheptou PO; Eckert CG; Goodwillie C; Johnston MO; Moeller DA; Ree RH; Sargent RD; Vallejo-Marín M
Evolution; 2011 Dec; 65(12):3339-59. PubMed ID: 22133210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. THE EFFECTS OF FIVE GENERATIONS OF ENFORCED SELFING ON POTENTIAL MALE AND FEMALE FUNCTION IN MIMULUS GUTTATUS.
Carr DE; Dudash MR
Evolution; 1997 Dec; 51(6):1797-1807. PubMed ID: 28565122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of Interference Between Selected Loci on the Mutation Load, Inbreeding Depression, and Heterosis.
Roze D
Genetics; 2015 Oct; 201(2):745-57. PubMed ID: 26269503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Inbreeding depression maintained by recessive lethal mutations interacting with stabilizing selection on quantitative characters in a partially self-fertilizing population.
Lande R; Porcher E
Evolution; 2017 May; 71(5):1191-1204. PubMed ID: 28321843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Selection in males purges the mutation load on female fitness.
Grieshop K; Maurizio PL; Arnqvist G; Berger D
Evol Lett; 2021 Aug; 5(4):328-343. PubMed ID: 34367659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Levels of inbreeding depression over seven generations of selfing in the androdioecious clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana.
Weeks SC
J Evol Biol; 2004 May; 17(3):475-84. PubMed ID: 15149390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Inbreeding rate modifies the dynamics of genetic load in small populations.
Pekkala N; Emily Knott K; Kotiaho JS; Puurtinen M
Ecol Evol; 2012 Aug; 2(8):1791-804. PubMed ID: 22957182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Genomic evidence for inbreeding depression and purging of deleterious genetic variation in Indian tigers.
Khan A; Patel K; Shukla H; Viswanathan A; van der Valk T; Borthakur U; Nigam P; Zachariah A; Jhala YV; Kardos M; Ramakrishnan U
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Dec; 118(49):. PubMed ID: 34848534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Detecting purging of inbreeding depression by a slow rate of inbreeding for various traits: the impact of environmental and experimental conditions.
Bundgaard J; Loeschcke V; Schou MF; Bijlsma KR
Heredity (Edinb); 2021 Jul; 127(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 33903740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. On the Consequences of Purging and Linkage on Fitness and Genetic Diversity.
Bersabé D; Caballero A; Pérez-Figueroa A; García-Dorado A
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Nov; 6(1):171-81. PubMed ID: 26564947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Has the inbreeding load for a condition-dependent sexual signalling trait been purged in insular lizard populations?
Runemark A; Hansson B; Ljungqvist M; Brydegaard M; Svensson EI
Mol Ecol; 2013 Mar; 22(5):1310-21. PubMed ID: 23294127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The genetic consequences of fluctuating inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant selfing rates.
Porcher E; Kelly JK; Cheptou PO; Eckert CG; Johnston MO; Kalisz S
J Evol Biol; 2009 Apr; 22(4):708-17. PubMed ID: 19228271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Estimation of genetic purging under competitive conditions.
López-Cortegano E; Vilas A; Caballero A; García-Dorado A
Evolution; 2016 Aug; 70(8):1856-70. PubMed ID: 27302839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Inbreeding load, average dominance and the mutation rate for mildly deleterious alleles in Mimulus guttatus.
Willis JH
Genetics; 1999 Dec; 153(4):1885-98. PubMed ID: 10581293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sexual selection and maintenance of sex: evidence from comparisons of rates of genomic accumulation of mutations and divergence of sex-related genes in sexual and hermaphroditic species of Caenorhabditis.
Artieri CG; Haerty W; Gupta BP; Singh RS
Mol Biol Evol; 2008 May; 25(5):972-9. PubMed ID: 18281268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sexual selection protects against extinction.
Lumley AJ; Michalczyk Ł; Kitson JJ; Spurgin LG; Morrison CA; Godwin JL; Dickinson ME; Martin OY; Emerson BC; Chapman T; Gage MJ
Nature; 2015 Jun; 522(7557):470-3. PubMed ID: 25985178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evolution of Inbreeding Avoidance and Inbreeding Preference through Mate Choice among Interacting Relatives.
Duthie AB; Reid JM
Am Nat; 2016 Dec; 188(6):651-667. PubMed ID: 27860505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Sexual selection is ineffectual or inhibits the purging of deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
Arbuthnott D; Rundle HD
Evolution; 2012 Jul; 66(7):2127-37. PubMed ID: 22759290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Long-term exhaustion of the inbreeding load in Drosophila melanogaster.
Pérez-Pereira N; Pouso R; Rus A; Vilas A; López-Cortegano E; García-Dorado A; Quesada H; Caballero A
Heredity (Edinb); 2021 Oct; 127(4):373-383. PubMed ID: 34400819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
