These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30788461)

  • 1. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Using Fork-Tip Needle Improves Histological Yield, Reduces Needle Passes, Without On-Site Cytopathological Evaluation.
    Song Z; Trujillo CN; Song H; Tongson-Ignacio JE; Chan MY
    J Pancreat Cancer; 2018; 4(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 30788461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
    Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.
    Wong T; Pattarapuntakul T; Netinatsunton N; Ovartlarnporn B; Sottisuporn J; Chamroonkul N; Sripongpun P; Jandee S; Kaewdech A; Attasaranya S; Piratvisuth T
    World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 35751053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.
    El Chafic AH; Loren D; Siddiqui A; Mounzer R; Cosgrove N; Kowalski T
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 28131864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Chen YI; Chatterjee A; Berger R; Kanber Y; Wyse J; Lam E; Gan I; Auger M; Kenshil S; Telford J; Donnellan F; Quinlan J; Lutzak G; Alshamsi F; Parent J; Waschke K; Alghamdi A; Barkun J; Metrakos P; Chaudhury P; Martel M; Dorreen A; Candido K; Miller C; Adam V; Barkun A; Zogopoulos G; Wong C
    Endoscopy; 2022 Jan; 54(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 33506455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration compared to endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle biopsy: diagnostic yield and the value of onsite cytopathological assessment.
    Khan MA; Grimm IS; Ali B; Nollan R; Tombazzi C; Ismail MK; Baron TH
    Endosc Int Open; 2017 May; 5(5):E363-E375. PubMed ID: 28497108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
    Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fine-needle biopsy is superior to fine-needle aspiration of suspected gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a large multicenter study.
    Trindade AJ; Benias PC; Alshelleh M; Bazarbashi AN; Tharian B; Inamdar S; Sharma N; Zelt C; Korrapati P; Barakat M; Sejpal DV; Ryou M
    Endosc Int Open; 2019 Jul; 7(7):E931-E936. PubMed ID: 31304239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
    Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The diagnostic and cellularity yield of reverse bevel versus fork-tip fine needle biopsy.
    Abdelfatah MM; Hamed A; Koutlas NJ; Aly FZ
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2018 Aug; 46(8):649-655. PubMed ID: 29737018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses.
    Gonzalez A; Wadhwa V; Singh H; Khan S; Gupta K; Liang H; Hussain I; Vargo J; Jang S; Chahal P; Bhatt A; Siddiki H; Erim T; Sanaka MR
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 May; 57(5):610-617. PubMed ID: 34991430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition by 22-Gauge Franseen and Standard Needles for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
    Ishigaki K; Nakai Y; Oyama H; Kanai S; Suzuki T; Nakamura T; Sato T; Hakuta R; Saito K; Saito T; Takahara N; Hamada T; Mizuno S; Kogure H; Tada M; Isayama H; Koike K
    Gut Liver; 2020 Nov; 14(6):817-825. PubMed ID: 32457276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between two types of needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine aspiration biopsy of pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal masses.
    Alkhateeb K; Lee BB; Alatassi H; Sanders MA; Omer EM; McClave SA; Fraig M
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Mar; 48(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 31850666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The difference in histological yield between 19G EUS-FNA and EUS-fine-needle biopsy needles.
    Ang TL; Li JW; Kwek ABE; Thurairajah PH; Wang LM
    Endosc Ultrasound; 2019; 8(4):255-260. PubMed ID: 31115385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy.
    Li Z; Liu W; Xu X; Li P
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2022 Sep; 56(8):668-678. PubMed ID: 35470294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Usefulness of a Fork-Tip Needle in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy for Gastric Subepithelial Lesions.
    Takasumi M; Hikichi T; Hashimoto M; Nakamura J; Kato T; Kobashi R; Yanagita T; Suzuki R; Sugimoto M; Sato Y; Irie H; Takagi T; Kobayakawa M; Hashimoto Y; Ohira H
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Oct; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34679581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novel fork-tip needles versus standard needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid masses of the upper GI tract: a matched cohort study.
    Jovani M; Abidi WM; Lee LS
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2017; 52(6-7):784-787. PubMed ID: 28355953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
    Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.