These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30788619)

  • 1. A hydrodynamic-stochastic model of chemotactic ciliated microorganisms.
    Maity R; Burada PS
    Eur Phys J E Soft Matter; 2019 Feb; 42(2):20. PubMed ID: 30788619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stochastic signal processing and transduction in chemotactic response of eukaryotic cells.
    Ueda M; Shibata T
    Biophys J; 2007 Jul; 93(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 17416630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Steering chiral swimmers along noisy helical paths.
    Friedrich BM; Jülicher F
    Phys Rev Lett; 2009 Aug; 103(6):068102. PubMed ID: 19792615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collective dynamics of model microorganisms with chemotactic signaling.
    Taktikos J; Zaburdaev V; Stark H
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 May; 85(5 Pt 1):051901. PubMed ID: 23004782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stochastic model of chemoattractant receptor dynamics in leukocyte chemosensory movement.
    Moghe PV; Tranquillo RT
    Bull Math Biol; 1994 Nov; 56(6):1041-93. PubMed ID: 7833844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stochastic control of spontaneous signal generation for gradient sensing in chemotaxis.
    Naoki H; Sakumura Y; Ishii S
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Nov; 255(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 18789338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biased random walk by stochastic fluctuations of chemoattractant-receptor interactions at the lower limit of detection.
    van Haastert PJ; Postma M
    Biophys J; 2007 Sep; 93(5):1787-96. PubMed ID: 17513372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stochastic signal inputs for chemotactic response in Dictyostelium cells revealed by single molecule imaging techniques.
    Miyanaga Y; Matsuoka S; Yanagida T; Ueda M
    Biosystems; 2007 Apr; 88(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 17184903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combined influence of hydrodynamics and chemotaxis in the distribution of microorganisms around spherical nutrient sources.
    Desai N; Ardekani AM
    Phys Rev E; 2018 Jul; 98(1-1):012419. PubMed ID: 30110747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A theory of macromolecular chemotaxis.
    Schurr JM; Fujimoto BS; Huynh L; Chiu DT
    J Phys Chem B; 2013 Jun; 117(25):7626-52. PubMed ID: 23656252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling Excitable Dynamics of Chemotactic Networks.
    Bhattacharya S; Iglesias PA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1407():397-415. PubMed ID: 27271916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Active targeting in a random porous medium by chemical swarm robots with secondary chemical signaling.
    Grančič P; Štěpánek F
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 Aug; 84(2 Pt 1):021925. PubMed ID: 21929036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simulations of chemotaxis and random motility in 2D random porous domains.
    Jabbarzadeh E; Abrams CF
    Bull Math Biol; 2007 Feb; 69(2):747-64. PubMed ID: 17216402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kinetic models for chemotaxis: hydrodynamic limits and spatio-temporal mechanisms.
    Dolak Y; Schmeiser C
    J Math Biol; 2005 Dec; 51(6):595-615. PubMed ID: 15940538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Steady-state chemotaxis in Escherichia coli.
    Kafri Y; da Silveira RA
    Phys Rev Lett; 2008 Jun; 100(23):238101. PubMed ID: 18643546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emergent Collective Chemotaxis without Single-Cell Gradient Sensing.
    Camley BA; Zimmermann J; Levine H; Rappel WJ
    Phys Rev Lett; 2016 Mar; 116(9):098101. PubMed ID: 26991203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hydrodynamics of chiral squirmers.
    Burada PS; Maity R; Jülicher F
    Phys Rev E; 2022 Feb; 105(2-1):024603. PubMed ID: 35291102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The computational sperm cell.
    Alvarez L; Friedrich BM; Gompper G; Kaupp UB
    Trends Cell Biol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):198-207. PubMed ID: 24342435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neutrophil migration under spatially-varying chemoattractant gradient profiles.
    Halilovic I; Wu J; Alexander M; Lin F
    Biomed Microdevices; 2015; 17(3):9963. PubMed ID: 25998723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decision making improves sperm chemotaxis in the presence of noise.
    Kromer JA; Märcker S; Lange S; Baier C; Friedrich BM
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 14(4):e1006109. PubMed ID: 29672515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.