174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30788759)
1. How to detect and correct myocardial creep in myocardial perfusion imaging using Rubidium-82 PET?
Koenders SS; van Dijk JD; Jager PL; Ottervanger JP; Slump CH; van Dalen JA
J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 26(3):729-734. PubMed ID: 30788759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of regadenoson-induced myocardial creep on dynamic Rubidium-82 PET myocardial blood flow quantification.
Koenders SS; van Dijk JD; Jager PL; Ottervanger JP; Slump CH; van Dalen JA
J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 26(3):719-728. PubMed ID: 30788758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. No need for frame-wise attenuation correction in dynamic Rubidium-82 PET for myocardial blood flow quantification.
van Dijk JD; Jager PL; Ottervanger JP; Slump CH; van Dalen JA
J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 26(3):738-745. PubMed ID: 30790203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Downward myocardial creep during stress PET imaging is inversely associated with mortality.
Kuronuma K; Miller RJH; Wei CC; Singh A; Lemley MH; Van Kriekinge SD; Kavanagh PB; Gransar H; Han D; Hayes SW; Thomson L; Dey D; Friedman JD; Berman DS; Slomka PJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2024 May; 51(6):1622-1631. PubMed ID: 38253908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stomach interference in
Rasmussen T; Kjær A; Hasbak P
J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1934-1942. PubMed ID: 29968157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Myocardial creep and cardiorespiratory motion correction improves diagnostic accuracy of Rubidium-82 cardiac positron emission tomography.
Lassen ML; Rasmussen T; Byrne C; Holmvang L; Kjaer A; Hasbak P
J Nucl Cardiol; 2023 Dec; 30(6):2289-2300. PubMed ID: 37624562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Blood pool and tissue phase patient motion effects on
Lee BC; Moody JB; Poitrasson-Rivière A; Melvin AC; Weinberg RL; Corbett JR; Ficaro EP; Murthy VL
J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1918-1929. PubMed ID: 29572594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated dynamic motion correction using normalized gradient fields for
Lee BC; Moody JB; Poitrasson-Rivière A; Melvin AC; Weinberg RL; Corbett JR; Murthy VL; Ficaro EP
J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 27(6):1982-1998. PubMed ID: 30406609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dependency of cardiac rubidium-82 imaging quantitative measures on age, gender, vascular territory, and software in a cardiovascular normal population.
Sunderland JJ; Pan XB; Declerck J; Menda Y
J Nucl Cardiol; 2015 Feb; 22(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 25294436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic implications of myocardial perfusion imaging by 82-rubidium positron emission tomography in male and female patients with angina and no perfusion defects.
Rauf M; Hansen KW; Galatius S; Wiinberg N; Brinth LS; Højstrup S; Talleruphuus U; Prescott E
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Jan; 24(2):212-222. PubMed ID: 36394344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of a protocol for routine simultaneous myocardial blood flow measurement and standard myocardial perfusion imaging with rubidium-82 on a high count rate positron emission tomography system.
Tout D; Tonge CM; Muthu S; Arumugam P
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Nov; 33(11):1202-11. PubMed ID: 22760302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Test-retest repeatability and software reproducibility of myocardial flow measurements using rest/adenosine stress Rubidium-82 PET/CT with and without motion correction in healthy young volunteers.
Byrne C; Kjaer A; Olsen NE; Forman JL; Hasbak P
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 28(6):2860-2871. PubMed ID: 32390111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimization of temporal sampling for
Lee BC; Moody JB; Weinberg RL; Corbett JR; Ficaro EP; Murthy VL
J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 24(5):1517-1529. PubMed ID: 28508271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Consistent tracer administration profile improves test-retest repeatability of myocardial blood flow quantification with
Klein R; Ocneanu A; Renaud JM; Ziadi MC; Beanlands RSB; deKemp RA
J Nucl Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 25(3):929-941. PubMed ID: 27804067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of prompt gamma compensation on myocardial blood flow measurements with rubidium-82 dynamic PET.
Armstrong IS; Memmott MJ; Tonge CM; Arumugam P
J Nucl Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 25(2):596-605. PubMed ID: 27624818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Myocardial blood flow quantification by Rb-82 cardiac PET/CT: A detailed reproducibility study between two semi-automatic analysis programs.
Dunet V; Klein R; Allenbach G; Renaud J; deKemp RA; Prior JO
J Nucl Cardiol; 2016 Jun; 23(3):499-510. PubMed ID: 25995182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison and prognostic validation of multiple methods of quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb PET.
Murthy VL; Lee BC; Sitek A; Naya M; Moody J; Polavarapu V; Ficaro EP; Di Carli MF
J Nucl Med; 2014 Dec; 55(12):1952-8. PubMed ID: 25429160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Outflow Tract Contributions to 82Rb-PET Global Myocardial Blood Flow Computations.
Van Tosh A; Reichek N; Palestro CJ; Nichols KJ
J Nucl Med Technol; 2016 Jun; 44(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 26966126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Myocardial perfusion quantification with Rb-82 PET: good interobserver agreement of Carimas software on global, regional, and segmental levels.
Nesterov SV; Deshayes E; Juarez-Orozco LE; deKemp RA; Sciagrà R; Malaspina S; Settimo L; Han C; Ryzhkova DV; Kostina IS; Gwet KL; Prior JO; Knuuti JM
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Jun; 36(6):507-514. PubMed ID: 35192160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of temporal sampling protocols on myocardial blood flow measurements using Rubidium-82 PET.
Koenders SS; van Dijk JD; Jager PL; Mouden M; Tegelaar AG; Slump CH; van Dalen JA
J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1729-1741. PubMed ID: 33655444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
