These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Comparison of rubidium-82 myocardial blood flow quantification with coronary calcium score for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis. Meintjes M; Sathekge M; Makanjee CR; Dickson JC; Endozo R; Rheeder P; Bomanji J Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Feb; 37(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 26485453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of motion correction in dynamic rubidium-82 cardiac PET with and without frame-by-frame adjustment of attenuation maps for calculation of myocardial blood flow. Armstrong IS; Memmott MJ; Saint KJ; Saillant A; Hayden C; Arumugam P J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Aug; 28(4):1334-1346. PubMed ID: 31388967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Myocardial perfusion in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: comparison between 320-MDCT and rubidium-82 PET. Dantas RN; Assuncao AN; Marques IA; Fahel MG; Nomura CH; Avila LFR; Giorgi MCP; Soares J; Meneghetti JC; Parga JR Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2665-2674. PubMed ID: 29352381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of the myocardial blood flow response to regadenoson and dipyridamole: a quantitative analysis in patients referred for clinical 82Rb myocardial perfusion PET. Goudarzi B; Fukushima K; Bravo P; Merrill J; Bengel FM Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2011 Oct; 38(10):1908-16. PubMed ID: 21656246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Value of SiPM PET in myocardial perfusion imaging using Rubidium-82. Koenders SS; van Dalen JA; Jager PL; Knollema S; Timmer JR; Mouden M; Slump CH; van Dijk JD J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 29(1):204-212. PubMed ID: 32410059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intersoftware variability impacts classification of cardiac PET exams. Oliveira JB; Sen YM; Wechalekar K J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):2007-2012. PubMed ID: 30238299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantification of myocardial blood flow in absolute terms using (82)Rb PET imaging: the RUBY-10 Study. Nesterov SV; Deshayes E; Sciagrà R; Settimo L; Declerck JM; Pan XB; Yoshinaga K; Katoh C; Slomka PJ; Germano G; Han C; Aalto V; Alessio AM; Ficaro EP; Lee BC; Nekolla SG; Gwet KL; deKemp RA; Klein R; Dickson J; Case JA; Bateman T; Prior JO; Knuuti JM JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Nov; 7(11):1119-1127. PubMed ID: 25306543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging correlates significantly to rubidium-82 positron emission tomography in patients with severe coronary artery disease: a preliminary study. Qayyum AA; Hasbak P; Larsson HBW; Christensen TE; Ghotbi AA; Mathiasen AB; Vejlstrup NG; Kjaer A; Kastrup J Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1120-1128. PubMed ID: 24815746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Activity regimes for 82Rb cardiac PET: Effects on absolute MBF and MPI. Hoff CM; Sørensen J; Christensen NL; Bouchelouche K; Tolbod L J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Apr; 29(2):449-460. PubMed ID: 32676911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. PET and SPECT Tracers for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. Klein R; Celiker-Guler E; Rotstein BH; deKemp RA Semin Nucl Med; 2020 May; 50(3):208-218. PubMed ID: 32284107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Selection of PET Camera and Implications on the Reliability and Accuracy of Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification. Klein R; deKemp RA Curr Cardiol Rep; 2020 Aug; 22(10):109. PubMed ID: 32770426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of the prognostic value of impaired stress myocardial blood flow, myocardial flow reserve, and myocardial flow capacity on low-dose Rubidium-82 SiPM PET/CT. Dietz M; Kamani CH; Allenbach G; Rubimbura V; Fournier S; Dunet V; Treglia G; Nicod Lalonde M; Schaefer N; Eeckhout E; Muller O; Prior JO J Nucl Cardiol; 2023 Aug; 30(4):1385-1395. PubMed ID: 36574175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]