These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30790415)

  • 1. Temporal trends of survival and utilization of mechanical circulatory support devices in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest secondary to ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation.
    Patel NJ; Atti V; Kumar V; Panakos A; Anantha Narayanan M; Bhardwaj B; Arora S; Deshmukh AJ; Patel N; Basir MB; Cohen MG; Kini AS; Sharma SK; Dangas G; O'Neill WW; Alfonso CE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 94(4):578-587. PubMed ID: 30790415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
    Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trends in utilization of mechanical circulatory support in patients hospitalized after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Patel NJ; Patel N; Bhardwaj B; Golwala H; Kumar V; Atti V; Arora S; Patel S; Patel N; Hernandez GA; Badheka A; Alfonso CE; Cohen MG; Bhatt DL; Kapur NK
    Resuscitation; 2018 Jun; 127():105-113. PubMed ID: 29674141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. National trends, predictors of use, and in-hospital outcomes in mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock.
    Strom JB; Zhao Y; Shen C; Chung M; Pinto DS; Popma JJ; Yeh RW
    EuroIntervention; 2018 Apr; 13(18):e2152-e2159. PubMed ID: 29400657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hospital Variation in the Utilization of Short-Term Nondurable Mechanical Circulatory Support in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Strom JB; Zhao Y; Shen C; Chung M; Pinto DS; Popma JJ; Cohen DJ; Yeh RW
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jan; 12(1):e007270. PubMed ID: 30608880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2000 to 2014.
    Vallabhajosyula S; Prasad A; Bell MR; Sandhu GS; Eleid MF; Dunlay SM; Schears GJ; Stulak JM; Singh M; Gersh BJ; Jaffe AS; Holmes DR; Rihal CS; Barsness GW
    Circ Heart Fail; 2019 Dec; 12(12):e005929. PubMed ID: 31826642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trends in the Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Patients Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
    Agarwal S; Sud K; Martin JM; Menon V
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1772-4. PubMed ID: 26585627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry.
    Berg DD; Barnett CF; Kenigsberg BB; Papolos A; Alviar CL; Baird-Zars VM; Barsness GW; Bohula EA; Brennan J; Burke JA; Carnicelli AP; Chaudhry SP; Cremer PC; Daniels LB; DeFilippis AP; Gerber DA; Granger CB; Hollenberg S; Horowitz JM; Gladden JD; Katz JN; Keeley EC; Keller N; Kontos MC; Lawler PR; Menon V; Metkus TS; Miller PE; Nativi-Nicolau J; Newby LK; Park JG; Phreaner N; Roswell RO; Schulman SP; Sinha SS; Snell RJ; Solomon MA; Teuteberg JJ; Tymchak W; van Diepen S; Morrow DA
    Circ Heart Fail; 2019 Nov; 12(11):e006635. PubMed ID: 31707801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz AP; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor CG; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e2037748. PubMed ID: 33616664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.
    Helgestad OKL; Josiassen J; Hassager C; Jensen LO; Holmvang L; Udesen NLJ; Schmidt H; Berg Ravn H; Moller JE
    Open Heart; 2020; 7(1):e001214. PubMed ID: 32201591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcome of rescue ablation in patients with refractory ventricular electrical storm requiring mechanical circulation support.
    Chung FP; Liao YC; Lin YJ; Chang SL; Lo LW; Hu YF; Tuan TC; Chao TF; Liao JN; Lin CY; Chang TY; Vicera JJB; Chin CG; Wu CI; Liu CM; Lee PT; Huang TC; Lugtu IC; Chen SA
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 31808239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
    Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Body mass index and outcomes of in-hospital ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation arrest.
    Ogunnaike BO; Whitten CW; Minhajuddin A; Melikman E; Joshi GP; Moon TS; Schneider PM; Bradley SM;
    Resuscitation; 2016 Aug; 105():156-60. PubMed ID: 27290990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical Circulatory Support During Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia: Indications and Options.
    Virk SA; Keren A; John RM; Santageli P; Eslick A; Kumar S
    Heart Lung Circ; 2019 Jan; 28(1):134-145. PubMed ID: 30355468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cardiogenic shock: incidence, survival and mechanical circulatory support usage 2007-2017-insights from a national registry.
    Lang CN; Kaier K; Zotzmann V; Stachon P; Pottgiesser T; von Zur Muehlen C; Zehender M; Duerschmied D; Schmid B; Bode C; Wengenmayer T; Staudacher DL
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2021 Sep; 110(9):1421-1430. PubMed ID: 33258007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock.
    Telukuntla KS; Estep JD
    Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2020; 16(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 32280415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical circulatory support for patients with cardiogenic shock.
    Rab T; O'Neill W
    Trends Cardiovasc Med; 2019 Oct; 29(7):410-417. PubMed ID: 30573276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia with mechanical hemodynamic support: An analysis of the Medicare database.
    Aryana A; d'Avila A; Cool CL; Miller MA; Garcia FC; Supple GE; Dukkipati SR; Lakkireddy D; Bunch TJ; Bowers MR; O'Neill PG; Reddy VY; Marchlinski FE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1295-1302. PubMed ID: 28800178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. US trends of in-hospital morbidity and mortality for acute myocardial infarctions complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Koester M; Dangl M; Albosta M; Grant J; Maning J; Colombo R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2024 Jul; 64():44-51. PubMed ID: 38378376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention requiring mechanical circulatory support in patients without cardiogenic shock.
    Al-Khadra Y; Alraies MC; Darmoch F; Pacha HM; Soud M; Kaki A; Rab T; Grines CL; Meraj P; Alaswad K; Kwok CS; Mamas M; Kapadia S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Feb; 95(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 31254325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.