187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30790674)
1. Statistical binning leads to profound model violation due to gene tree error incurred by trying to avoid gene tree error.
Adams RH; Castoe TA
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2019 May; 134():164-171. PubMed ID: 30790674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Weighted Statistical Binning: Enabling Statistically Consistent Genome-Scale Phylogenetic Analyses.
Bayzid MS; Mirarab S; Boussau B; Warnow T
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129183. PubMed ID: 26086579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Supergene validation: A model-based protocol for assessing the accuracy of non-model-based supergene methods.
Adams RH; Castoe TA
MethodsX; 2019; 6():2181-2188. PubMed ID: 31667118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistical binning enables an accurate coalescent-based estimation of the avian tree.
Mirarab S; Bayzid MS; Boussau B; Warnow T
Science; 2014 Dec; 346(6215):1250463. PubMed ID: 25504728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accounting for Uncertainty in Gene Tree Estimation: Summary-Coalescent Species Tree Inference in a Challenging Radiation of Australian Lizards.
Blom MPK; Bragg JG; Potter S; Moritz C
Syst Biol; 2017 May; 66(3):352-366. PubMed ID: 28039387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The gene tree delusion.
Springer MS; Gatesy J
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A matter of phylogenetic scale: Distinguishing incomplete lineage sorting from lateral gene transfer as the cause of gene tree discord in recent versus deep diversification histories.
Knowles LL; Huang H; Sukumaran J; Smith SA
Am J Bot; 2018 Mar; 105(3):376-384. PubMed ID: 29710372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Filtration of Gene Trees From 9,000 Exons, Introns, and UCEs Disentangles Conflicting Phylogenomic Relationships in Tree Frogs (Hylidae).
Hutter CR; Duellman W
Genome Biol Evol; 2023 May; 15(5):. PubMed ID: 37129064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. To Include or Not to Include: The Impact of Gene Filtering on Species Tree Estimation Methods.
Molloy EK; Warnow T
Syst Biol; 2018 Mar; 67(2):285-303. PubMed ID: 29029338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the Robustness to Gene Tree Estimation Error (or lack thereof) of Coalescent-Based Species Tree Methods.
Roch S; Warnow T
Syst Biol; 2015 Jul; 64(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 25813358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phylogenomic analyses data of the avian phylogenomics project.
Jarvis ED; Mirarab S; Aberer AJ; Li B; Houde P; Li C; Ho SY; Faircloth BC; Nabholz B; Howard JT; Suh A; Weber CC; da Fonseca RR; Alfaro-Núñez A; Narula N; Liu L; Burt D; Ellegren H; Edwards SV; Stamatakis A; Mindell DP; Cracraft J; Braun EL; Warnow T; Jun W; Gilbert MT; Zhang G;
Gigascience; 2015; 4():4. PubMed ID: 25741440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dissecting Incongruence between Concatenation- and Quartet-Based Approaches in Phylogenomic Data.
Shen XX; Steenwyk JL; Rokas A
Syst Biol; 2021 Aug; 70(5):997-1014. PubMed ID: 33616672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Naive binning improves phylogenomic analyses.
Bayzid MS; Warnow T
Bioinformatics; 2013 Sep; 29(18):2277-84. PubMed ID: 23842808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Signal, Uncertainty, and Conflict in Phylogenomic Data for a Diverse Lineage of Microbial Eukaryotes (Diatoms, Bacillariophyta).
Parks MB; Wickett NJ; Alverson AJ
Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Jan; 35(1):80-93. PubMed ID: 29040712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating species phylogeny from gene-tree probabilities despite incomplete lineage sorting: an example from Melanoplus grasshoppers.
Carstens BC; Knowles LL
Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):400-11. PubMed ID: 17520504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of SVDquartets and other coalescent-based species tree estimation methods.
Chou J; Gupta A; Yaduvanshi S; Davidson R; Nute M; Mirarab S; Warnow T
BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):S2. PubMed ID: 26449249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modern Phylogenomics: Building Phylogenetic Trees Using the Multispecies Coalescent Model.
Liu L; Anderson C; Pearl D; Edwards SV
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1910():211-239. PubMed ID: 31278666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating phylogenetic trees from genome-scale data.
Liu L; Xi Z; Wu S; Davis CC; Edwards SV
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Dec; 1360():36-53. PubMed ID: 25873435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Collapsing dubiously resolved gene-tree branches in phylogenomic coalescent analyses.
Simmons MP; Gatesy J
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2021 May; 158():107092. PubMed ID: 33545272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Multispecies Coalescent Model Outperforms Concatenation Across Diverse Phylogenomic Data Sets.
Jiang X; Edwards SV; Liu L
Syst Biol; 2020 Jul; 69(4):795-812. PubMed ID: 32011711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
